Views
2533
Comments
411
  • 12/04/2011, 12:52AM ET

Put down the SEC flavored Kool-Aid, folks!!!

Marlins Fan (151-66-33) vs And the Prophecy Read (43-15-5)
51
Votes
15
Votes
51
Votes
15
Votes


Oklahoma State should get the chance to battle LSU in the National Championship game. Alabama should not be given the chance for a do-over.

Disagree? Well, you're wrong.

But feel free to accept this TD and argue your point.

Here's some of my points:

I'll break it down more later, but Oklahoma State played a tougher schedule than Alabama, and both teams finished with the same record at 11-1 each. Forget what you heard about the SEC being so much tougher than the other conferences. OSU played a tougher schedule. Period.

Not only that, but Alabama already lost to LSU. Why give them a do-over? **** that.

Now some might say that Alabama deserves the edge because their loss came to LSU, while Ok St's loss came at the hands of Iowa State. But Ok St lost that game in double overtime. And it was two days after a couple of Ok St lady's basketball coaches were killed in a tragic plance accident.

After Ok St pounded Oklahoma tonight to win the Big 12 Championship while Alabama sat at home and watched because they didn't even qualify for their conference championship, it became clear that Ok St, and not Alabama, should play LSU for the national title.


I mean this in the nicest way possible, Oklahoma States womens basketball coches death affected the football team about as much as it would Alabama's womens bball coaches dying. Those kids are there to play football. People die every day, if you want to say death is tragedy then let Arkansas who had to bury a teammate play in the game since the LSU game was shortly there after. My sympathy goes out to the deceased but it in no way shape or form affected the football team.

And why give 'Bama a do over? Well one could say they outplayed LSU. One could say they were clearly the better team. The score might say otherwise but I doubt Bama misses that many field goas again. And I highly doubt both teams don't score again. Its a different type of game. Its a game where you have nothing to lose instead of having everything to lose. The playbook opens up a little more and more chances are taken at that point.

Last time I checked LSU > Okla State. If Bama wins that game they play today. You can't fault them for playing in LSU conference if no other team was undefeated and since Bama played such a strong game in a losing effort. Bama is the 2nd best team in the nation.


I completely disagree about the OSU coaches deaths not impacting the football team.

Here's a personal anecdote that might explain why I feel the way I do.

Growing up, I lived in San Antonio, TX. I played high school football for a 5A school. (Go Holmes Huskies!!)

During my junior year, two students from my HS were murdered in a field across the freeway from my HS campus.

Their deaths weighed heavily on my mind, and on the minds of a lot of my fellow students and student athletes.

I can't explain it, but something is off when someone from your world is killed, and it's a really hard feeling to shake off. You start reevaluating life, and your perspective on many topics becomes completely changed.

There's no doubt in my mind that at least some of the OSU players were impacted by the tragic accident. I have no doubt that at least some of those players' preparation suffered as a result of the accident.

Keep in mind this was a day before the Iowa St game, a game they lost in double overtime.

Penalizing the OSU football team for being off their game after a tragic accident is not only the wrong move, it's callous.

OSU>Alabama

December 4, 2011  12:55 AM ET

Agree <----------------

Also pretty sure the Iowa State loss came on the same day that the school/public found out the coaches died. Believe the crash happened the day before but it took time to figure out who was in it

December 4, 2011  12:57 AM ET

Completely agree

December 4, 2011  12:57 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Agree <----------------Also pretty sure the Iowa State loss came on the same day that the school/public found out the coaches died. Believe the crash happened the day before but it took time to figure out who was in it

I think it was a couple days later, but the point is still the same

Comment #4 has been removed
December 4, 2011  01:19 AM ET

They were basketball coaches right? I don't think that is what caused the Oklahoma St. football team to lose. They just underestimated their opponent and Iowa St. got a couple of good breaks. But either way, I would like to see OK St. and LSU go at it. O vs. D instead of D vs. D.

December 4, 2011  01:24 AM ET

"Disagree? Well, you're wrong."

Haha, reminds me of the saying "everyone's entitled to my opinion."

That said, I agree with you.

December 4, 2011  01:28 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

They were basketball coaches right? I don't think that is what caused the Oklahoma St. football team to lose. They just underestimated their opponent and Iowa St. got a couple of good breaks. But either way, I would like to see OK St. and LSU go at it. O vs. D instead of D vs. D.

You can't blame the loss on that. But theirs a connection between athletes at the school and especially coaches. For something like that to happen (let alone for a second time in recent school history) it weighs on you. Even if its just a small thought occupying your head on game-day it can still have effect.

Comment #8 has been removed
Comment #9 has been removed
December 4, 2011  01:47 AM ET

Honey badger doesn't give a **** who he plays.

Comment #11 has been removed
December 4, 2011  03:52 AM ET

Well, after thinking about it, I agree that it should be LSU-Ok. St. The only other team that comes close is Stanford, but they didn't play in their conference title game as well. We have to wait and see how the coaches vote and what the whacky BCS computers compute.

BCS Title Game
LSU vs. OK St.

Rose Bowl
Oregon vs. Wisconsin

Fiesta Bowl
Stanford vs. Kansas State or TCU

Sugar Bowl
Alabama vs. Michigan

Orange Bowl
Clemson vs. West Virginia

December 4, 2011  08:17 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

Well, after thinking about it, I agree that it should be LSU-Ok. St. The only other team that comes close is Stanford, but they didn't play in their conference title game as well. We have to wait and see how the coaches vote and what the whacky BCS computers compute. BCS Title GameLSU vs. OK St. Rose BowlOregon vs. Wisconsin Fiesta BowlStanford vs. Kansas State or TCUSugar BowlAlabama vs. Michigan Orange BowlClemson vs. West Virginia

Stanford gets another easy W.

December 4, 2011  08:54 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Yeah, it was two days later but you're right, the point is still the same.

It wasn't two days later. It was one day later, and Budke and Serna were found the same day as the game: November 18th.

December 4, 2011  08:56 AM ET
QUOTE(#13):

Stanford gets another easy W.

I'd rather see Boise than KSU or TCU as a true at large.

December 4, 2011  09:19 AM ET

I expect Oklahoma State to lose out in the subjective votes in large part because their name is Oklahoma State.

December 4, 2011  09:27 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

Well, after thinking about it, I agree that it should be LSU-Ok. St. The only other team that comes close is Stanford, but they didn't play in their conference title game as well. We have to wait and see how the coaches vote and what the whacky BCS computers compute. BCS Title GameLSU vs. OK St. Rose BowlOregon vs. Wisconsin Fiesta BowlStanford vs. Kansas State or TCUSugar BowlAlabama vs. Michigan Orange BowlClemson vs. West Virginia

Your Sugar Bowl pick...Really? Even though MSU made it to the conference title game and finished the season ranked higer in conference than UM? Interesting, how do you figure?

December 4, 2011  09:37 AM ET
QUOTE(#17):

Your Sugar Bowl pick...Really? Even though MSU made it to the conference title game and finished the season ranked higer in conference than UM? Interesting, how do you figure?

Thought the same thing, I have to assume he meant Michigan St.

December 4, 2011  09:38 AM ET

Basically it comes down to quality of wins vs the quality of loss. Obviously Bama lost to a tougher opponent then Ok St but OkSt played the tougher schedule, played 5 current top25 teams and 7 teams that are going to bowls compared to 2 and 3 respectively for Bama.

 
December 4, 2011  09:43 AM ET
QUOTE(#19):

Basically it comes down to quality of wins vs the quality of loss. Obviously Bama lost to a tougher opponent then Ok St but OkSt played the tougher schedule, played 5 current top25 teams and 7 teams that are going to bowls compared to 2 and 3 respectively for Bama.

If LSU and Bama play for it all I'm gonna be sick. I don't care how good Bama is this year. The bottom line is they did not win their division of the SEC or the conference crown. And even the most die-hard Bama or SEC fan can't deny that.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 (Un) 101 18 8 82.7%
2 Darth Maim 80 20 6 78.3%
3 DO_WORK... 76 31 13 68.8%
4 :CubanM... 63 27 7 68.6%
5 Olderth... 86 35 17 68.5%
6 JimJ77 Can't make it up 130 53 26 68.4%
7 Marlins Fan 151 66 33 67.0%
8 HOOTZ 31 14 11 65.2%
9 Argos. 177 103 27 62.1%
10 Schad - Notorious Deadbeat 71 43 9 61.4%

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    LeBron lacking key champion component
    Views
    3836
    Comments
    1382
  2. 2
    Cavs coming up empty for top-pick deal
    Views
    6308
    Comments
    695
  3. 3
    Yankees suddenly need ... A-Rod
    Views
    14533
    Comments
    217
  4. 4
    Youkilis headed in reverse
    Views
    9419
    Comments
    216
  5. 5
    Marchand accuses Shaw of eye-gouging
    Views
    7403
    Comments
    126

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Just DJ
  2. 2
    UnBiasedPerspective-ChaosRules
  3. 3
    Mil Town Proud
  4. 4
    Manny Rottstorm
  5. 5
    Wamu

Message Boards

  1. NBA > General NBA

    NBA: Lots of rumors about the…
    Views
    378
    Replies
    5

Blogs