• 07/15/2012, 08:15PM ET

Johan Santana to HOF?

CuntryBlumpkin (305-247-64) vs Mitch_Woulf (1-1-0)

When Johan Santana retires, SHOULD he be inducted into the HOF?

I say yes.

It's true that Santana doesn't have, and with his injury problems of recent years, probably won't have the compiled stats most think of when they think HOF. He'll be lucky to get 200 wins, 3000 strikeouts is out of reach unless he can stay healthy the rest of his career, but the numbers he has put up when healthy and during his peak should warrant an induction into the HOF.

There was a 5 year stretch in Santana's career where he was arguably, and in my opinion was the best pitcher in baseball, and that's something that can't be overlooked.

During Santana's best years he lead his league in ERA 3x, WHIP 4x, strikeouts 3x and won 2 Cy Young Awards and was robbed of another.

He's been very successful in both leagues, and the argument is between he and Halladay as to who the best starting pitcher of the 2000s was. It's rare to see a p[itcher that gets so many strikeouts have the control of Santana. A career K/BB of 3.52 is great, and during his peak years he saw a ration of better than 5 a couple times.

He is HOF material

Is Johan Santana a good pitcher? the answer is yes. Was there a time when he was outright nasty? The answer is is still yes. Santana sadly has had a big injury that may keep him out. Santana only has 139 wins right now which isnt near as many as you need to make the Hall of Fame. There have been several really good pitchers that have not made the Hall of Fame, including Bret Saberhagen and Denny McClain both won 2 Cy Young's and did not end up making the HOF.

The Hall of Fame is not chosen from a 5 year stretch of dominance, it is judged over a whole career. Should Doc Gooden be in the Hall of Fame? He had a great 5 year stretch were he was a Cy Young winner, 4 time All Star led the league in Strikeouts twice, and had a great ERA. But he didnt have the numbers a Hall of famer should have when he was done with his career.

Santana isnt near as dominant this year coming back from Tommy John Sugary as he was in years past, which is a shame, it is likely he will never be the same. The Hall of Fame committee, doesnt give free passes if you were good at a time in your career, you need a good long career to make it, especially in baseball.

The issue with comparing Santana to Saberhagen and McLain is for McLain, he had a sharp decline in productivity immediately after MLB lowered the mound, and his best season is known as the year of the pitcher, and really he only had around 3 good seasons, and he didn't meet the HOF requirement of at least 10 full seasons to qualify and as for Saberhagen, though he has 2 Cy Youngs, was never near as dominant as Santana was during his peak seasons.

Santana's situation is more in line with Sandy Koufax's. I know Koufax's peak was more dominant, but Koufax lacked the compiled stats, much like Santana and got in because of his great 5 season peak where he was the best pitcher in the Majors.

Being the best in the majors at your position for an extended period of time, and 5 years is an extended period of time says something about the skill level of the player.

Also keep in mind that Santana is 33 years old, he has some time to get closer to 200 wins and 2500 strikeouts.

You seem to be arguing that Santana won't get voted in. That's not what this TD is about. It's about whether or not he SHOULD be voted in, and I still say he SHOULD.

Santana was very good in that five year stretch, but he is not even in the same ball park as Sandy Koufax. Koufax led the league in ERA his last 5 Seasons, winning 3 Cy Young's leading the league in WHIP 4 and Strikeouts 3 of his last 5 years. The kind of dominance Koufax had was arguably better then any 5 year stretch by a pitcher in baseball History. Something Koufax and Santana had in common was their big success really didnt start till they were 25. Koufax retired very early unlike Santana. Koufax also had 40 shutouts.

Saying that Santana was the best maybe 2nd best ( Halladay ) is true, and yes 5 years is a long time. 5 years is not a career though. Santana's stats are still good and above average, but especially in MLB 11-9 and 13-9 ( His last 2 seasons ) Consistently are not going to make the cut for the Hall of Fame .

It is true that Santana will be in the Majors for at least a few more years, barring any injury's, even 175 wins may be a stretch at this time though.

The Baseball Hall of Fame is very hard to get into, and with his stats he just shouldn't be a Hall of Famer with just 5 great seasons.

You can say Santana wasn't near as dominant as Koufax, and while I do agree, he lead the league in WHIP and strikeouts in the same amount of seasons as Koufax, and Koufax was pitching with a higher mound and never had to face a DH. And while Koufax's era was better, their era's compared to the rest of the league are essentially the same during their peak.

Dizzy Dean is another good comparison to Santana. Was great for a 5-6 year period, but injuries sidetracked his career, but he still made it into the HOF.

IMO, when discussing whether or not a player should be voted into the HOF, the prime seasons should be the main seasons looked at. Injuries and old age might skew stats towards the end of a career and inexperience and nerves can skew them early in a career. Santana's prime years were arguably the best of the last decade.

If it were only a 2-3 year stretch, I could see not voting him in, but 5 years is a long enough span to induct him. Being the best at your position for an extended period of time should get you in the HOF.

Santana's stats are great, he just doesn't have the compiled stats.

Unlike Santana though, after the age of 25 Koufax was dominant every year until his early retirement, Koufax had 4 No hitters and 23 one hitters, that is the definition of dominance which shows why Sandy is deserving.

It is unfair to compare Dizzy Dean to Johan Santana. First off, Dean played in the 1930's. Everyone knew who Dizzy Dean was,perhaps the most popular pitcher in ML History. Dean played in a different time. If you want to make a comparison, Dean had 30 wins in 1934, along with 29CG in 35, and led the league in strikeouts his first 4 years. Dean was probably voted in because of what he did for baseball and how he was a household name, he drew fans and made more people interested in the game of baseball.

It is true that the prime of your career is looked at when being looked at for the Hall of Fame they still do look long term, where Santana's stats have not been completly lights out the past few years. Ryan Braun has been amazing his last 5 and a half years,up there with the best,if he gets injured and comes back and is average the rest of his career, ends up with lets say 1750 hits and 300 Home Runs, he would not make the Hall,why would Johan be any different?

July 15, 2012  08:17 PM ET

Do not accept this TD if you don't plan on finishing. If I'm losing by 20 votes, I will either finish the TD or forfeit, I expect the same from whoever takes this. There's no need to clog up the TD sections with never ending TDs.

July 15, 2012  08:57 PM ET

Interesting topic.

July 15, 2012  09:47 PM ET

first throwdown hopefully I dont embarrass my self, good luck!

July 15, 2012  09:59 PM ET

first throwdown hopefully I dont embarrass my self, good luck!

Be sure to stay to finish it.

July 15, 2012  10:06 PM ET

Be sure to stay to finish it.

There's a 99% chance he won't.

I'd bet at least five shiny nickels on it.

Comment #6 has been removed
July 15, 2012  10:14 PM ET

ill take you guys up on that bet

July 15, 2012  10:17 PM ET

ill take you guys up on that bet

I hope you prove us all wrong; most noobs don't.

Good first argument, aside from the whole "sugary" thing...

July 15, 2012  10:17 PM ET

ill take you guys up on that bet

You talking the five dirty or the five shiny nickel bet? Cause I ain't interested in any dirty nickels.

Comment #10 has been removed
July 15, 2012  10:19 PM ET

I'd bet five dirty nickels.

I don't want to know where that roll of nickels has been.

Comment #12 has been removed
July 15, 2012  10:20 PM ET

I hope you prove us all wrong; most noobs don't.Good first argument, aside from the whole "sugary" thing...

oops probably should read my posts over and check for spelling errors, that's embarrassing

Comment #14 has been removed
Comment #15 has been removed
July 15, 2012  10:21 PM ET

In my coin purse.


July 15, 2012  10:21 PM ET

In my coin jar.

Is that what you call it?

Comment #18 has been removed
Comment #19 has been removed
July 15, 2012  10:23 PM ET

My son and I were laughing all the way through it. Better than the 1st.

It's far and away the best animated movie featuring animals in rainbow wigs out this year.


Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


  Fan W L T Win %
1 fvkasm2x 193 58 12 75.7%
2 7#bag _ Com 997 338 74 73.4%
3 HOOTZ 33 14 9 67.0%
4 Marlins Fan 156 78 31 64.7%
5 Argos. 184 101 29 63.2%
6 Goodell: Fannation Savior 644 430 71 59.3%
7 J-Business 78 66 19 53.7%
8 Highway... 175 852 64 19.0%

The Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Truth & Rumors


  1. 1
    Clippers, Warriors exchange barbs
  2. 2
    Time to penalize NHL's perennial losers?
  3. 3
    Tuukka Rask takes blame for Bruins' Game 1 loss
  4. 4
    Smush Parker allegedly punches high schooler
  5. 5
    Quarterback freefalling down draft boards

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
    Deep Creek

Message Boards

  1. NFL > General NFL

    What The Texans Should do with…
  2. NBA > General NBA

    Toronto Raptors: No time to…
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Paying NCAA athletes