Views
1534
Comments
113
  • 07/21/2012, 10:48PM ET

NFL Dynasties.

BFB (3-1-0) vs Marlins Fan (156-78-31)
5
Votes
16
Votes
5
Votes
16
Votes


Who had the best dynasty? The 70's Steelers, 80's 49ers, 90's Cowboy's or the 00's Patriots.

Whoever accepts can pick first but start reasons why in the second argument.

I will then pick and begin.

Good luck to whoever accepts.


I really hate myself for what I'm about to say. But the obvious answer is...





















... the 70''s-era Steelers. I'll wait to argue this until I know who you're picking. Good luck.


I have chosen the San Francisco 49er's.

The winners of Super Bowls 16,19,23 and 24.

The 49er's went from a rebuilding project that had back to back 2 game winning seasons to a dominating team in the 80's winning 4 Super Bowls and continuing dominance into the early 90's

The 49er's had Joe Montana the only QB to be Super Bowl MVP 3 times. The first team to win back to back Super Bowls with 2 different coaches.

Although the Steelers were a dominant team in the 70's the 49er's dominated in Super Bowls outscoring their opponents 139 points to 63 for a margin of 76 points. The Steelers out scored their opponents 103 to 73 for a margin of 30 points.

The 49er's also hold the record for largest point difference with their 55-10 win over the Denver Bronco's in SB 24.

It can be said that like the Steelers in the 70's, no one wanted to face the 49er's in the Super Bowl in the 80's.


Great choice with the 49ers. I know I said the Steelers were the obvious choice, but that was a poor choice of words on my part. The Steelers were one of TWO obvious choices, since both they and the 49ers won four Super Bowls during their respective eras.

So what separates the San Fran and Pittsburgh dynasties? Well, it has been said that dominant teams aren't true dynasties until they've won Championships in back to back years. The Steelers of the 70's can certainly lay claim to dynasty status, then, because they went back to back TWICE in the 70's. Pitt won SB's 9 and 10, and then repeated as champions again in SB's 13 and 14.

San Fran did go back to back in SB's 23 and 24, but the other two SB's they won were not in succession.

Another factor we have to consider is the quality of the competition. In the 70's Pitt faced Dallas (twice), Minnesota and the LA Rams. Minnesota played in four SB's during the 70's, and the Purple People Eaters were known as one of the most ferocious, talented and intimidating teams of the decade. The Cowboys of the 70's appeared in five SB's, winning two. Pitt played the best of the best and still won four SB's.

GL.


As you stated in your argument about the quality of competition, the 49er's faced the likes of the Vikings, the Bears the Skins, the Rams, the Cowboy's, the Eagles and the Giants just to get to the Super Bowl. All had either won or where in a Super Bowl. Thats some pretty stiff competition.

Who did the Steelers have to get past? the only teams that represented the AFC in the same era in the Super Bowl were the Raiders,Dolphins.Colts and Bronco's. there was stiff competition from the Oilers ,Browns, Bengals, Bills and Chargers.

So in the 80's winning the NFC championship was equal to winning the Super Bowl.

So in conclusion although the 49er's won 2 Super Bowls back to back and 2 spaced apart they dominated their opponents like no other team.

It's been a pleasure TDing with you MF and from reading some comments I have some topics we might want to TD in the future. Good luck in your argument and the Voting.


I cant argue that San Fran faced tough competition leading up to the SB, but as the 2007 Patriots made so abundantly clear, anything and everything you do before the Super Bowl pales in comparison to what happens once you reach the big dance.

I spoke earlier about the gauntlet that Pitt had to overcome to win those four Super Bowls; now I'd like to take a moment to talk about the teams the 49ers faced in their SB's, Cincinnati (twice), Miami and Denver. Cincinnati has never won a single SB and despite the fact they appeared there twice in the 80's, truth is they really weren't that great of teams. The Miami team San Fran faced was decent but far from spectacular. Marino was their only real weapon, and even he was only a second year player, albeit a great one. That Denver team was good but nothing to write home about.

All in all there is no doubt that Pitt faced much stiffer SB competition than the 49ers did.

The 70's Steelers featured the only team ever to have drafted 4 HoFers in one year (
1974, Swann, Lambert, Stallworth and Webster), and were loaded with talent. Besides the four from '74 there's Joe Greene, Bradshaw, Blount, Ham and Harris.

GL

Comment #1 has been removed
Comment #2 has been removed
July 21, 2012  10:59 PM ET
QUOTE(#2):

Vick said so.

Maybe he got bit in the neck by a dog and the blood loss caused his irrational thinking.

Comment #4 has been removed
Comment #5 has been removed
July 21, 2012  11:07 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Too many apostrophes. Oh well.

I'm going with the 49er's . Have to some research but should have an argument up by morning.


Good luck MF. Got my work cut out for me.

Comment #7 has been removed
July 21, 2012  11:18 PM ET

As much as I hate to put it that way, I would list them in reverse order as you listed them. The pats, then cowboys then niners and steelers.

Comment #9 has been removed
Comment #10 has been removed
Comment #11 has been removed
July 21, 2012  11:32 PM ET
QUOTE(#8):

As much as I hate to put it that way, I would list them in reverse order as you listed them. The pats, then cowboys then niners and steelers.

Does it really matter?!

July 22, 2012  12:32 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

Does it really matter?!

July 22, 2012  01:10 AM ET

Niners.

End debate.

July 22, 2012  01:11 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

I'm going with the 49er's . Have to some research but should have an argument up by morning.Good luck MF. Got my work cut out for me.

Well...you're starting with the right answer. The Niners are far better than those cocaine and steroid-fueled Steeler teams of the 70's.

July 22, 2012  01:12 AM ET

LOL- MF

As much as you hate to say it... I hate to agree with you.

Comment #17 has been removed
Comment #18 has been removed
Comment #19 has been removed
 
Comment #20 has been removed

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 Darth Maim 76 21 7 76.4%
2 fvkasm2x 193 58 12 75.7%
3 7#bag _ Com 996 338 73 73.4%
4 HOOTZ 33 14 9 67.0%
5 Marlins Fan 156 78 31 64.7%
6 Argos. 183 101 29 63.1%
7 Goodell 2.0 643 429 71 59.4%
8 J-Business 78 66 18 53.7%
9 Highway... 175 847 63 19.0%

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Irving: Fans don't deserve the Cavs
    Views
    6204
    Comments
    680
  2. 2
    Red Sox dodged two injury scares
    Views
    2894
    Comments
    495
  3. 3
    Trump taking a legit run at the Bills
    Views
    2156
    Comments
    106
  4. 4
    Why the Raiders have lost 111 of 160 games
    Views
    5007
    Comments
    66
  5. 5
    Bruins can't count on shut-down D
    Views
    1379
    Comments
    59

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Robataille
  2. 2
    ~Mother-Marge~
  3. 3
    TxHeat
  4. 4
    buddhaa.luck
  5. 5
    Deep Creek

Message Boards

  1. NFL > General NFL

    What Next?
    Views
    139
    Replies
    26

Blogs