Views
23
Comments
67
  • October 18, 2007 12:03 PM ET

Can baseball survive longterm without a salary cap?

Plato's Apprentice (8-11-0) vs Gruden Honors Stu Ungar (202-126-17)
20
Votes
33
Votes
20
Votes
33
Votes


It's a classic case of the have's and the have nots. I realize that money will not necessarily buy championships, but a $250 million US payroll will certainly better the chances. I say baseball needs a salary cap to inject competition and longterm viability. Sorry Yankee and Bosox fans, but I don't believe perennial contention with increased payroll is good for baseball.


Sounds good in theory, but without a salary cap, low budget/small market teams continue to make the playoffs and win the world series. From what we can see right now, two of the small market teams with very low salaries are about to battle it out for the world series. And the Yankees continue to spend 200 million bucks, and not win it. So while we all may think a cap is the answer, reality says its not making a difference.


But how long will that last? That is an anomaly and not the norm. Statistically, it cannot last. Eventually you will have more and more big market clubs coming out ahead and winning. Baseball doesn't have a playoff system, so the small market teams cannot compete in the long run. Torii HUnter is about to leave Minnesota and I suspect Morneau as well. Can MN ever compete again? Maybe, but not probably.
I think to have long term sustainability, one must level the playing field every year.


Anomaly? 2005, Chicago over Houston. 2006, St Louis over Detroit. 2007, Colorado vs Cleveland (probably). Seems to me that the anamoly would be if a big budget/large market teams gets there. The trend is actually that the small market teams are winning more and more, not the opposite that you predict.

How many world series titles did Minnesota win WITH Torii Hunter? He's 32, and the last few years have been kinda eh anyway. Baseball has proven time and time again that money doesn't always buy talent


You know there isn't necessarily a direct correlation between a viable franchise and winning. A team can win but still not be profitable. Sports is a very unique enterprise where one needs the competition to survive (other teams to play each other) and having teams that are losing money or barely surviving is not god for the sport. And my time frame is 50 years +, when i said long term, i meant long term. For baseball as a business to compete against other sports, they need a cap.


The argument isn't about the profitability of a team. Its up to the owner if he wants to go for profit. You can turn a profit and still be a bad team. How long has it been since the Yankees BOUGHT Babe Ruth. The time frame I'm talking about is far longer than 50 years. And baseball has been around longer than any other sport we have. I use baseball as an example as why you DO NOT need a salary cap. Not why you do. And remember, Terence Mann said it best:

The one constant through all the years, Ray, has been baseball. America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It has been erased like a blackboard, rebuilt and erased again. But baseball has marked the time. This field, this game: it's a part of our past, Ray. It reminds of us of all that once was good and it could be again.

October 18, 2007  12:05 PM ET

damn you Gruden!!!!

October 18, 2007  12:10 PM ET

welcome chucky...let's throw it down

October 18, 2007  12:17 PM ET

"How long will it last?" - Its been going on for years. Small market low budget teams have been doing extremely well since they learned the ways to do it. Baseball does not need salary cap. Only needs revenue sharing which they already have. Just need to improve the revenue sharing plan a little.

October 18, 2007  12:23 PM ET

interesting, i go with plato for different reasons, you cant buy series wins weve seen that and its not going to change

the problem is everytime a small market team makes it their players promptly leave for the large market teams, preventing the teams from growing in both value and fan base

noone cares anymore about baseball, ratings are in the dirt, its rediculous that A-rod thinks hes worth that much but if someone will pay it hell go, and that blatent disregard for fans/winning/ or a sense of home team is what has cost baseball its respect

hence the marlin fans dont give a rats balls and theyve won 2 in what the last 10 yrs?

October 18, 2007  12:23 PM ET

Baseball doesn't have a playoff system???

Geez, I wonder what I've been watching for the last few weeks.

October 18, 2007  12:24 PM ET

gruden cheats he has over 8 different profiles

Comment has been removed
October 18, 2007  12:28 PM ET

LO is an idiot, he has only 1/2 a brain. This is my only throwdown profile.

Comment has been removed
October 18, 2007  12:29 PM ET

I think the salary cap ship has already set sail. 6 or 7 years ago, I was an emphatic supporter of the cap. Now, small market teams have gotten stronger in ways that do not require mega-contracts: through the draft, scouting and player development.

October 18, 2007  12:30 PM ET

Thanks Krobe. I've challenged him several times to show me the other profiles.

October 18, 2007  12:32 PM ET

How do you explain the Yankees in the eighties? or many of the teams with highish payrolls not performing up to their salary seeding. Let us also recognize that it takes a particular disregard for value to have a payroll that high, Giambi at 23 mil Mussina at 18 or so, the list goes on but you get the idea. When bringing a guy in, if years and money are not as important you can pay him the one or two extra to ride the bench at a highly inflated salary.
salary caps are communism.

October 18, 2007  12:33 PM ET

Gruden, I usually agree with you, but a question here:

The Red Sox and the Yankees spend the most, and every year they are both in the playoffs (Yankees 12 years straight). Although not necessarily impacting the World Series, those two clubs have won 5 between them in the last 12 years. Is there another sport that has that consolidated base of champions in such a short period of time in modern sports history?

I just wonder although right now we have clubs with lower salaries winning, how long will it last when the Red Sox and Yankees steal their best players in a few years when their contracts are up? I think the problem is not necessarily this specific year, but overall, competition levels are down somewhat.

I have not voted yet - I just want to know your thoughts on this . Thanks!

October 18, 2007  12:33 PM ET

what the hell happened to bombers gruden?

Comment has been removed
October 18, 2007  12:37 PM ET

i'm gonna say it again: there is no need for a salary cap. at all. revenue sharing right now is perfectly fine and there is no such thing as a "small market team;" there are only owners who don't like to spend money. the owners of the Royals, Devil Rays, Pirates, Twins, etc. can afford ANY player they want at ANY price he demands, they just don't want to.

October 18, 2007  12:37 PM ET

Simple answer there Acura: They are in the same division with another monster salary team, Baltimore. And with all of that in one division beating on each other and outspending everyone, it really doesn't affect the other divisions.

October 18, 2007  12:38 PM ET

as for competition spreading around, there were 7 playoff teams this year that weren't in the playoffs last year; the Yankees were the only repeat team. there has been a different World Series winner every year since 2000 and no team has won it twice in that time.

October 18, 2007  12:39 PM ET

bam I was gonna say that jet.

 
October 18, 2007  12:40 PM ET

So, you agree that if more teams start this monster spending in other divisions, then the problem gets worse? Are you saying that since it is only out of control with two teams no salary cap is needed? I understand if that is your approach. I wonder what the people in Tampa, Toronto, and the rest of the AL think?

To be honest, I am of a mixed mind of this. I will rate this on the completed throwdown and then vote - based on your arguements. Thanks for your time.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 YODA 46 3 2 92.2%
2 Porkins: You're all my dupes 154 14 1 91.4%
3 Detroit... 132 9 8 91.3%
4 The Ram 148 17 4 88.8%
5 Baun-de... 61 7 2 88.6%
6 FoosBal... 82 12 2 86.5%
7 Hyped78 128 19 5 85.9%
8 PhillyE... 75 11 4 85.6%
9 [The] Coach 103 18 5 83.7%
10 Sooner in WA- beat Tex Tech 53 12 3 80.1%

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    T.O. frustrated with Cowboys offense
    Views
    12881
    Comments
    1587
  2. 2
    Would Red Sox dare to shop Big Papi?
    Views
    9544
    Comments
    1257
  3. 3
    Notre Dame nixes students' recruiting plot
    Views
    7114
    Comments
    76
  4. 4
    Agent: Ocho Cinco's future in owner's hands
    Views
    6774
    Comments
    76
  5. 5
    Michigan, Ohio State sparring for recruits
    Views
    6287
    Comments
    65

Throwdowns

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    PimpyLooka
  2. 2
    bcoltrinari
  3. 3
    Epoch1
  4. 4
    Dyhard is Jimmie Johnson
  5. 5
    Three Tracks In Dirt

Message Boards

  1. MMA > Fight Club

    A mockery, or publicity boost?
    Views
    810
    Replies
    8
  2. MMA > Fight Club

    Fitch Back
    Views
    382
    Replies
    5
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    The love for USC had died
    Views
    306
    Replies
    63

Blogs