Views
515
Comments
30
  • 02/20/2013, 10:06AM ET

Which MLB team will be the biggest disappointment, and which will be biggest surprise?

Outlaw... (330-270-74) vs Marlins Fan (146-66-32)
2
Votes
2
Votes
2
Votes
2
Votes


By biggest surprise, I mean which team will most surpass preseason expectations.


For the biggest disappointment, I have the Los Angeles Dodgers(Tough choice between them and the Blue Jays).

Really, I don't see where all this hype is coming from. They traded for a bunch of guys that were overpaid and either couldn't hit, couldn't pitch or couldn't stay healthy in Boston, and they're expecting these players to hit, pitch or stay healthy in LA? Doesn't make a lot of sense to me. If this roster had been put together 3 years ago, I'd be scared, but as of now, they're just an overpriced team full of players ran out of Boston, and Hanley, who is a big time head case and not as good as he once was.



For the biggest surprise team, I'll stick with the NL West and pick the San Diego Padres.

They were one of the best teams in the majors during the second half last season, and they kept basically all of the players. They have some solid young pitching and an offense that has the potential to put runs on the board. Keeping Chase Headley was huge for San Diego, I can see them contending for the division or wild card.


I'm writing this on a tablet so I need to apologize in advance for the typos/auto-correct mistakes that are sure to follow.

I'm not going to counter your selections just yet in order to be fair, so let's get to the teams I've chosen for this debate.

For biggest disappointment I'm going with the Texas Rangers. The Rangers appeared in two of the last three World Series and they're generally viewed as a perennial WS contender.

However, this isn't the same old Rangers team. They lost their cleanup hitter and one of their better outfielders in Josh Hamilton, a player not so far removed from an MVP season. They also lost Mike Napoli who was critical to their postseaskn run in 2011 and at times looked like one of the most dominating players in the game. Also Nelson Cruz is battling PED stories and Adrian Beltre certainly isn't getting any younger. I just don't see who's going to replace Hamilton's run production, among other things.

For biggest surprise I'll take the Seattle Mariners. Their offense still leaves a bit to be desired but Kendrys Morales will provide some desperately needed power and their pitching... oh, their pitching. More on that soon.


Nobody is really expecting the Rangers to win the AL West this season, so I don't think they'll be a disappointment. They lost their best and most popular player in Hamilton and let Napoli walk to the Red Sox, and their rotation has some serious questions.

MLB Network says the Rangers look like a third place team behind the Angels and A's, so if anything Texas has the opportunity to surprise people this season, because on paper, they're way behind the Angels.

I just don't think enough people are expecting the Rangers to perform well for them to be a disappointment.

As for the Mariners, yeah, they added Morse and Morales, but they also lost their number 2 and number 3 starters. I think they're a decent team, and maybe the added wins of playing the Astros puts them around .500, but their division is just too stacked ahead of them.

If the Mariners finish ahead of the Angels, Mike Sciosia should be fired, and despite the Rangers' losses, they still have a lineup capable of putting up a lot of crooked numbers, and we all saw last season how scrappy this A's bunch is.


Not sure why you think "nobody" is expecting the Rangers to make a WS appearance but according to Las Vegas' betting lines the team from Texas has the 6th best chances of any MLB team, so I feel pretty safe and secure saying they're viewed as a likely 2013 WS contender.

And I stand by my statement that they are destined to be a disappointment this year, something I notice you didn't really argue against at all.

Seattle I have a lot to say about but I want to focus on your argument so I'll save the Mariners talk for my third argument.

Moving on, you say the Dodgers are doomed to disappoint this year but I disagree.

LA easily has the best lineup in the NL. Seriously, Matt Kemp, Andre Ethier, Hanley Ramirez, Adrian Gonzalez, Carl Crawford, Dee Gordon, the surprisingly effective AJ Ellis behind the plate (shout out to the former Albuquerque Isotopes mentioned there), nobody has an offense as loaded as the DOdgers in the NL.

And their pitching is better than you think.

Fisrt off, Clayton Kershaw is the best LHP in the game, and one of the best overall. Beckett always owns during odd-numbered years. Lilly, Grienke and Billingsley give LA a nasty rotation.


The general fan base thinks Texas will have a bit of a down year, and thus it really wouldn't be a big surprise if they had a down year.

They lost two huge pieces of their lineup, two starters(Feldman and Dempster) and their setup man in Mike Adams, and while they did replace Napol and Adams, the other spots remain vacant. You can only lose so much talent to a division rival before you have to pick the division rival to beat you. Much more is expected of the Dodgers than the Rangers, and the Rangers are a better team.

If this were 3 years ago, you' be right about LA's lineup, but since we're in the present it's a lineup full of hasbeens and Boston's trash. Kemp and Ethier are very solid, A-Gon and Crawford, there's a reason Boston didn't want them anymore. Hanley- He needs to prove he still has it.

Kersaw is a great pitcher, and Greinke is solid, but after that, LA's rotation is scaring nobody. Beckett, Ryu, Billingsley(coming off an injury) isn't scaring a soul.

Seattle has potential to be a solid team, but San Diego ended last season one of the hottest teams in baseball, and they're more talented and play in an easier division than the Mariners.


Crawford may or may not be finished as a (very) borderline MVP candidate but I don't see any reason Adrian Gonzalez shouldn't have a huge year. He's back in the NL West, a division he seemed very comfortable in, and there's plenty of protection in the lineup to where he should post numbers more similar to his MVP candidate years.

And again, LA's wealth of pitching makes it hard to see them collapsing barring injuries or some other strange and unpredictable set of circumstances.

Remember, Beckett dominatesthe odd years. Doesn't matter that he sucked last year; he always sucks on even years. He'll give one of those seasons where you start believing maybe he could be an ace again, as hes prone to do. During odd years. Remember that.

Also I disagree with your premises that A)the Padres are more talented than Seattle, and B)the AL West is stronger than the NL West this year. Might sound crazy but as I already stated, Texas will fall off, the fluky A's will regress to the mean, and Lord knows what to expect from the Angels. (See what I did there?)

The NL West, conversely, features the reigning World Champion Giants and the LOADED Dodgers.

Good TD, GL.

February 20, 2013  10:13 AM ET

The Pirates will be both. They will dominate at the beginning of the year, then lose their last 40 games.

February 20, 2013  11:18 AM ET

Both those would be my two picks. Though Angels I would pick as #2 instead of Toronto.

Comment #3 has been removed
February 20, 2013  01:18 PM ET

Blue Jays win the East!

February 20, 2013  01:27 PM ET
QUOTE(#3):

The Dodgers also added Greinke. Granted, he's a headcase as well, but he was the biggest FA on the market this year.

Hamilton was the top free agent, and you're right, Greinke is a head case.

February 20, 2013  03:57 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Blue Jays win the East!

I've got Tampa.

February 20, 2013  10:04 PM ET

The Dodgers, I think, are overrated, but Kershaw-Greinke-Beckett-Lilly-Capuano-Harang-Billingsley-Ryu is pretty nice. Holes, but lots of pitching.

My picks for biggest disappointment? Atlanta Braves and Toronto Blue Jays.

Biggest surprise? Boston Red Sox and Philadelphia Phillies.

February 20, 2013  10:19 PM ET

The biggest surprise? The Houston Astros. I guarantee they won't be the worst team in the NL this season.

February 20, 2013  10:59 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Blue Jays win the East!

It's not going to work the way people are expecting it to. I see them fighting both Boston and Baltimore for 3rd place.

February 20, 2013  11:06 PM ET
QUOTE(#6):

I've got Tampa.

I think it's the Yankees to lose one more time before the over-paid old guys combine with managements demands to slash payroll before next year turns them into a 4th or 5th place team for a few years.

February 21, 2013  12:23 AM ET

I agree with comments 9 and 10, though not the part about them being content being 4th or 5th for a few years. I won't be shocked if Tampa wins the East this year, but I'm not sold on the Blue Jays, the Red Sox should improve a bit but won't compete for the division title I don't think, and the Orioles were the luckiest team in MLB history last year.

There was a good article on SI this past week about how the Orioles would be defying major history if they don't suffer a major setback this year, and while history has been defied before and I don't think it will be "major," I don't see the Orioles winning 90+ games again.

February 21, 2013  12:27 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

I agree with comments 9 and 10, though not the part about them being content being 4th or 5th for a few years. I won't be shocked if Tampa wins the East this year, but I'm not sold on the Blue Jays, the Red Sox should improve a bit but won't compete for the division title I don't think, and the Orioles were the luckiest team in MLB history last year.There was a good article on SI this past week about how the Orioles would be defying major history if they don't suffer a major setback this year, and while history has been defied before and I don't think it will be "major," I don't see the Orioles winning 90+ games again.

As for everyone saying the Yankees are going to fall back this year, the only real position they lost that wasn't filled by a quality starter was catcher, which admittedly could be an issue, but Martin, despite his good power and defense, was still a .220 hitter. They had the 2nd best offense last year in the MLB, and the 4th best pitching staff in the AL, and besides getting older (though they've been getting older for a while, and shown no signs of it), they didn't lose as much as people say.

Swisher was replaced by Gardner and a full year of Ichiro, Ibanez by Hafner who should benefit a lot from the short porch, Soriano with Mariano who was still pitching as good as he always has 2 years ago as a 41 year old, and Youk for A-Rod for half a year at this stage in both of their careers is more of an even trade off than it sounds.

February 21, 2013  12:28 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

I agree with comments 9 and 10, though not the part about them being content being 4th or 5th for a few years.

That said, I'm not saying they won't regress at some point, and with the competitiveness of the AL East it is possible the Yankees fall into 4th in the near future, but I just don't think they'd ever fully rebuild to the point of being cellar dwellers for many seasons.

February 21, 2013  01:13 AM ET

I didn't realize my selections were going to be so "AL West-y", but such is life.

February 21, 2013  02:30 AM ET
QUOTE(#8):

The biggest surprise? The Houston Astros. I guarantee they won't be the worst team in the NL this season.

Worst in the AL?

February 21, 2013  06:13 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

The Pirates will be both. They will dominate at the beginning of the year, then lose their last 40 games.

You mean just like they already did the last two years? Maybe the third (or 21st but who's counting) year will be the charm and the Pirates will only be a big surprise this year!

I can always hope, can't I!!!

Go Bucs!

February 21, 2013  10:19 AM ET
QUOTE(#7):

The Dodgers, I think, are overrated, but Kershaw-Greinke-Beckett-Lilly-Capuano-Harang-Billingsley-Ryu is pretty nice. Holes, but lots of pitching.My picks for biggest disappointment? Atlanta Braves and Toronto Blue Jays.Biggest surprise? Boston Red Sox and Philadelphia Phillies.

The Braves have a better rotation than the Dodgers, and it's not even close if you wanna compare bull pens. Really, center field is the only position the Dodgers have that I wish the Braves had.

Braves>Dodgers.

February 21, 2013  11:04 AM ET

Pirates<a winning season :^D

February 22, 2013  11:25 AM ET

It will be interesting to see what moving the fences does to the offenses in Seattle and San Diego.

Kind of...

 
February 23, 2013  01:05 PM ET

In a close one, I gotta go right. It would be nice to see the Dodgers fall flat on their faces, but I think they will be right there with the Giants for the Division in the end.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Leaderboard

  Fan W L T Win %
1 OJ Simpson 48 11 4 79.4%
2 Bloggers Needed 1094 336 89 75.0%
3 JimJ77 Best in the World! 129 53 26 68.3%
4 :CubanM... 62 27 7 68.2%
5 Olderth... 84 35 17 68.0%
6 Marlins Fan 146 66 32 66.4%
7 Argos. 174 103 26 61.7%
8 J-Business 91 73 24 54.8%
9 PCH-R. Barber best BUC eva 925 1535 406 39.4%
10 Highway... 170 813 53 19.0%

The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Could Cavs trade entire draft for shot at Nerlens Noel?
    Views
    3138
    Comments
    552
  2. 2
    Redskin fans buy RGIII's entire wedding registry
    Views
    11005
    Comments
    86
  3. 3
    Report: Ex-Miami coach says unreported SEC violations far worse
    Views
    11717
    Comments
    47
  4. 4
    Rangers eyeing Caps free agent?
    Views
    3524
    Comments
    27
  5. 5
    Donte Stallworth claims CIA questioned him
    Views
    1271
    Comments
    26

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    BigSlick74
  2. 2
    JimJ77 Best in the World!
  3. 3
    Swamp Dragon
  4. 4
    williewilliejuan
  5. 5
    WILD FAN

Blogs