FanNation - The Republic of Sport

This is hard for me...defend Favre and bash the rest of the Packers, or defend the Packers as a team and concede that Romo (a Cowboy! Yuck!) is marginally better than the best QB ever. This is a conundrum.

This is an interesting TD. I don't think I could honestly decide. There are many factors.

For Romo, I think it's been Witten that has kept that team going. I know he does not have the most TD's or recieving yards but he has been Romo's workhorse!

I love Jennings, Driver and of course Favre. I would have to say that Dave is getting it done with experience. Experience does matter.

If I really had to pick one of them, I might pick Favre because I did not expect a performance like this out of him based upon the last couple of years, specifically last year.

I think Romo is great and will only get better but I'm going to go with Favre. They do have less weapons. Just look at the running games between the two.

Favre it is...but really for my own reasons.

CCC just confirmed my Favre vote because he said running game doesn't matter when discussing QBs.

Man, I'm tired. I wrote Dave instead of Brett.

CCC: Every aspect of the offensive game matters for a QB. Imagine Romo having no running game. He'd be down and out....

"CCC just confirmed my Favre vote"

I confirmed your Favre vote by being a Cowboys fan, don't lie. ;-)

"CCC: Every aspect of the offensive game matters for a QB."

Yeah. So does a defense, turnovers, time of possession, offensive line, play calling etc. etc. etc.

THIS TD is about QB production.

"because he said running game doesn't matter when discussing QBs."

That's NOT what I said.

statistically romo is better...CCC rakes mine

CCC: This is what you said, "Who cares how crappy the Packers running game is? This is about QB's."

Does that not contradict your other statements???

No, cat, it doesn't. The Cowboys running game has absolutely sucked in the first half of games, too. So what? That has nothing to do with the performance of the QB.

I'll get back to this tommorow

Terry Glenn is hurt, hasn't played a down all year. TO has 12 TD catches, Romo has thrown 27 TDs, I'll let you all do the math on that one.

Its a team game and that reflects greatly on the QB position. The Cowboys have the better supporting cast but Favre still has great numbers. If Favre was on the Cowboys your team would be even better. His long ball is better and he is a more savy player. Favre is doing almost as well with much much less. You have a TD that states TO is the best WR in the NFC. I totally agree and that is making Romo better. Favre has a bunch of scrappy guys but no one great but his team is doing just as well.

I agree with favrefan,
I'm torn in the actually facts of the case but CCC just makes such piss poor points.

Favre doesnt have a running game or a TE, he has 3 capable WR's while Romo has

WR-TO
WR-Crayton has developed into a good No.2
TE-Witten
RB-Jones
RB-Barber

The running game does affect the passing game, open your eyes CCC......And Romo's stats are only slightly better in yards and TD's......Favre has to throw since they have no running game so he will have more completions and attempts......

FYI: Like Packers and Boys equally so no favoritism here, this is the 1st vote against CCC in a while.......

Dallas 117 rushing yards
GB 80

"Favre doesnt have a running game or a TE"

djroxalot: Back from LA | 11/21/07

Sorry but Donald Lee is headed to the pro bowl this year along with Witten.

Vote to CCC--better arguments. Saying the running game doesn't matter is less dumb than claiming Favre beats Romo in almost every passing category.

CCC I will have to go against you in this one, just for the fact that in your other TD (that you are winning, with a good argument) that T.O. is the best WR in the NFC. You can't tell me that Favre doing more with less is not more impressive as Romo doing exactly what he should be doing with all that talent around him (especially once they get Terry Glenn back).

fact is: quit saying "fact is"

How the Hell is C3 losing? He has shown statistically that Romo is better than Favre in almost every way, shape, or form. The numbers don't lie.

Also, don't give me this garbage that the Packers have no weapons, and that the Cowboys have more in a bunch of inexperienced guys. Truth is, those guys are putting up great numbers. But due to their lack of experience, things could have gone either way. Tell the truth: If they would have been dropping passes that most would have caught (such as those some certain Bears players have been doing,) then you would be bashing the Cowboys, saying they have next to nothing. You would say they would be one and done in the playoffs, if they even made the playoffs.

Also, as C3 has already stated, Glenn has been out all year. For Romo to be such a feared QB with a bunch of young ones on the team is simply remarkable. This isn't even a contest- C3 gets my vote.