Truth & Rumors > NCAAF

Alvarez in Wisconsin power struggle

Views
24696
Comments
67

here is no doubt the past 20 years have been the golden age of University of Wisconsin athletics. But at what cost? The battle brewing on campus regarding the level and method of control that should be exerted over the UW Athletic Department is a sign that the brainiacs who run the university have once again failed to strike a proper balance between handcuffing the department and giving its administrators the power to operate as they please. The latest debate began when the UW Athletic Board, which is charged with overseeing the athletic department, unanimously endorsed the recommendation of a self-study committee that significantly altered the relationship between the board and the department by reducing the board's role in personnel matters. Their reasoning was that the department, which has grown into an $85-million-a-year business, needs the flexibility to make timely decisions on hiring and firing coaches and that such matters should be left to the athletic director and chancellor. Opposing that viewpoint is a group of faculty members led by Bruce Jones and Jeremi Suri, former athletic board members who took issue with the self-study when it was presented to the UW Faculty Senate in April. They say the faculty policies and procedures document, which dates to the 1930s, stipulates that personnel decisions involving UW coaches must get athletic board approval. Some saw the whole thing as a power play by athletic director Barry Alvarez to gain even more authority. Alvarez has rarely heard the word "no" since he arrived in Madison as UW's football coach in 1990 and even ignored state laws -- with the approval of then-chancellor John Wiley -- in 2005 when he named Bret Bielema his successor in football without following proper hiring procedures. There are further indications Alvarez has been operating without adult supervision. Jones was chairman of the athletic board when Bielema was hired, yet he didn't learn about the hiring until about two hours before the press conference to announce the news. Some faculty were also concerned in 2007 about the board's lack of input regarding UW's contract with the Big Ten Network and again in 2008 when Alvarez announced that embattled women's basketball coach Lisa Stone would have her contract renewed without even discussing it with the board.

Wisconsin State Journal

Barry Alvarez, Doug Benc/Getty Images Barry Alvarez, Doug Benc/Getty Images
May 12, 2009  09:01 AM ET

Sounds like Alvarez is trying to get UW on the same page as every other DI university. When you have FACULTY members quoting procedures from the 30's, you realize that you are dealing with pissy professors who feel like they are losing power.

Depression era athletic procedures are so in vogue and relevant these days.

Go Barry!

May 12, 2009  09:22 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Sounds like Alvarez is trying to get UW on the same page as every other DI university. When you have FACULTY members quoting procedures from the 30's, you realize that you are dealing with pissy professors who feel like they are losing power. Depression era athletic procedures are so in vogue and relevant these days.Go Barry!

Absolutely true! I'll go with Alvarez over someone who knows very little about sports.

May 12, 2009  09:29 AM ET

Not really that interested in Sconsin Athletics except I sure do wish they'd bring back the retro helmets with the big W on the front of the shell. Those are some of the coolest helmets ever.

May 12, 2009  09:46 AM ET

Hiring/Firing by a board/committee? No wonder Bucky suffered until Barry came along. Why even have an athletic director if you are not going to let them make the personel decisions. There needs to be checks and balances to keep athletics from going overboard, but that is the chancellor's job to make a good hire for the AD. And the faculty/athletic board can still provide oversight in keeping the athletic department in good standing with all the NCAA rules. Even as adults, the faculty geeks still have an inferiority complex towards the jocks.

May 12, 2009  09:47 AM ET

Once again, the faculty of a University thinks just because they have a college degree and teach some classes, that they are qualified to make decisions on who should coach athletic teams. Unless Alvarez and the previous AD were running things on the shady side, let things go the way they have been.

May 12, 2009  09:50 AM ET

The biggest problem With UW sports is they hold the athletes to the same standards as the students unlike every other school in the Big 11 even Northwestern has easier admission standards for athletes. Its pretty amazing what they have done despite that. That is the thing they really need to change

May 12, 2009  10:13 AM ET

If Bielema can't turn things around soon enough, hiring him would be the first bad move on the part of Barry Alvarez. That guy has been a godsend to UW-Athletics. I do agree though the board should have some say in those matters.

May 12, 2009  10:23 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

The biggest problem With UW sports is they hold the athletes to the same standards as the students unlike every other school in the Big 11 even Northwestern has easier admission standards for athletes. Its pretty amazing what they have done despite that. That is the thing they really need to change

Be careful what you wish for. I am not so sure I want them to dumb down our athletic admissions. I would prefer to have our current overall athletic department then turning into a quasi pro team for football and basketball like some of the SEC schools (you bring a greater chance of adding the negatives that come with that approach). Look where we fare in the Sears Director Cup standings every year. Always near the top, often in the top five. Usually the best of the big ten schools. We may not win national championships in the big 2 of football and basketball, but we are usually a top 15 school in those 2 and compete for national championships in other sports.

May 12, 2009  10:26 AM ET

I taught in the system. Trusting faculty to do oversee athletics is way out. They can't even stop their own from dating their students.

May 12, 2009  10:36 AM ET

Why can't we return to the way things were at Wisconsin, when football games were drunken orgies and the faculty had a firm grasp of control and were apparently okay with that? Seriously though, this is probably more about Bielema than people think. He is not doing so well and some, out of reverence for Alvarez, won't cross the now-AD but others want to stop the slide before they give-back all the respectability that Alvarez built. . .and yeah. . .maybe Alvarez is too egotistical to admit that Bielema is failing.

May 12, 2009  10:42 AM ET

Doesn't sound like there is much of a power "struggle" going on here. A few faculty members are whining but Alvarez is pretty much doing as he pleases. Not much of a struggle...

May 12, 2009  10:42 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

The biggest problem With UW sports is they hold the athletes to the same standards as the students unlike every other school in the Big 11 even Northwestern has easier admission standards for athletes. Its pretty amazing what they have done despite that. That is the thing they really need to change

So let me get this straight, Wisconsin is so so so good, that they are able to accomplish what Stanford, Notre Dame, Rutgers, Northwestern, cannot? Wisconsin has been able to stay relevent while not comproising standards for athletes? Someone has sold you a load of crap and you're spreading it here. No thanks. I'm not buying it.

May 12, 2009  10:49 AM ET
QUOTE(#7):

If Bielema can't turn things around soon enough, hiring him would be the first bad move on the part of Barry Alvarez. That guy has been a godsend to UW-Athletics. I do agree though the board should have some say in those matters.

It seems there is a patern of bad decision by rouge ADs that have led to some shoddy HC hirings at a couple of higher profile Big Ten schools. RR was brought in under the radar at Michigan too and many internally were not happy. I'm sure some UM fans will chime in and give us the ****-ba-ya version though, spinned for the benfit of the stupid. . .but don't let them fool you.

May 12, 2009  11:00 AM ET

You cannot use policies that date back to the 1930's. This program has been stuck in the same place for the last ten years. We can't seem to break into a big bowl unless we win the Big Ten and it's the Rose Bowl. Granted that is the biggest, but until recruits see Wisconsin on the same level as Michigan and Penn State in their own conference we won't get many of those blue chip kids. The board should have say, but if something has to be done Alvarez and the chancellor should be able to make a quick decision.

May 12, 2009  11:08 AM ET

I've got an idea.. let's get Obama involved.. he's our savior, he can fix ANYTHING!

May 12, 2009  11:10 AM ET

As an alum, I think Barry has been an amazing leader for Wisconsin athletics and should be entrusted with the power to hire and fire coaches. He put Wisconsin sports on the map, and not just in football. Why are we looking at policies from the 30's? why are we not updating our policies? I agree that I want the high academic standards to stay in place but I don't think the power of hiring/firing coaches will affect that in any great ammount. Barry is/has been good for the university of Wisconsin.....let him continue to lead the way.

May 12, 2009  11:14 AM ET

Sorry folks , I'm a huge sports fan but I can tell you removing board over site is a huge mistake here. If you don't see the problem of giving one person sole power in these matters you are myopic in how you have viewed the college sports scene the last few years . The truth is that all these decisions on hiring and firing are not time sensitive an. Too many bad decisions on these types of issues have led to problems elsewhere . Follow the old rules they were put there by wise men for a reason . Lack of over site and the concentration of power only leads to trouble in the long run . A single ego with excessive power can ruin decades of good work if not properly controlled .

May 12, 2009  11:17 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

So let me get this straight, Wisconsin is so so so good, that they are able to accomplish what Stanford, Notre Dame, Rutgers, Northwestern, cannot? Wisconsin has been able to stay relevent while not comproising standards for athletes? Someone has sold you a load of crap and you're spreading it here. No thanks. I'm not buying it.

To get into UW-Madison you need at least a 26 on the ACT and you need to be in the top 25% of your graduating class and those are bare mins.

May 12, 2009  11:19 AM ET
QUOTE(#15):

I've got an idea.. let's get Obama involved.. he's our savior, he can fix ANYTHING!

well duh everyone knows that maybe he can work on world hunger after he fixes Wisconsin.

 
May 12, 2009  11:22 AM ET

Faculty at a univeristy or college should not be involved in the hiring procedures of the athletic department. In fact if they have the time to be involved in this, they are shirking more important duties.

My wife is on faculty at a large D1 uni, and she barely has time for her classes, her masters students, phD students, her writing/publications, research and fund raising let alone her own family.

And you have a uni where faculty wants involvement? Dare I say those folks are not pulling their weight in other areas?

Tenure is the biggest scam in the working arena.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Cowher to Bears or Texans?
    Views
    72302
    Comments
    3110
  2. 2
    Red Sox-Jays deal-killer?
    Views
    32663
    Comments
    1172
  3. 3
    Yankees to cut down on spending
    Views
    11194
    Comments
    1166
  4. 4
    Martz to jump-start Bears offense?
    Views
    11718
    Comments
    880
  5. 5
    Disrespected Ryan takes dig at Moss
    Views
    12714
    Comments
    730

Throwdowns

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Longhorns vs. Aggies…
    Views
    528
    Replies
    78
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    No More 'Canes and Gators
    Views
    284
    Replies
    52
  3. NFL > General NFL

    Teams nooooooobody wants to…
    Views
    188
    Replies
    29

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos