Truth & Rumors > NHL

Coyotes staying put for now

Views
1748
Comments
15

The Coyotes, for now, are staying in Glendale. On Tuesday, a U.S. Bankruptcy judge put on hold who controls the team and whether it can be moved to Canada. The delay in those key issues gave the NHL encouragement that the Coyotes will at least play the 2009-10 season in the desert. "It's our position we can't schedule a team outside of Glendale for next year," said Bill Daly, NHL deputy commissioner. "If a court orders us to do that, we will have to reconsider." Judge Redfield Baum, during a four-hour hearing in downtown Phoenix, ordered the league and owner Jerry Moyes to seek mediation on who controls the bankrupt franchise. The sides have fought over that since Moyes sought Chapter 11 protection May 5 and agreed to sell the team to Jim Balsillie. The Canadian billionaire is offering $212.5 million, but the sale is contingent on moving the team to Hamilton, Ontario. The NHL has said Moyes didn't have the right to seek bankruptcy protection or sell the franchise because it has controlled the team since November, when the league took over financing of the club. At that time, Moyes signed a proxy, or agreement, that the league said gave it control. An attorney for Moyes argued Tuesday that the proxy gave the league only voting rights, and during the hearing Baum challenged the NHL's interpretation that the proxy gave the league control. Moyes declined to comment Tuesday, but a spokesman said Baum made it clear Moyes still owned the team. The sides will report their progress on mediation at 9 a.m. next Wednesday. If they are not successful, Baum said he would rule on the matter. The control issue, however, might be irrelevant if the judge agrees with the NHL that the team can't be moved without consent of other owners.

Arizona Republic

Gary Bettman, Getty Images Gary Bettman, Getty Images
May 20, 2009  07:52 AM ET

The NHL should just cut their losses and let them move the team already. If the Coyotes remain in limbo throughout the upcoming season, the few fans that they still have will not show up because of all of this bad PR. Who would want to support a team when they may leave next year or the following year?

May 20, 2009  07:59 AM ET

Bettman and Daly do not deal in our Earth logic, they use some sort of alien logic. If they were fishermen there would be no fish in the sea, if they were hunters there would be no animals to hunt.

May 20, 2009  08:43 AM ET

Its amazing that the midget's smugness can actually be seen in a photograph, and not just in person. I have a hard time believing that Balisillie is going to be winning this one, now that the other 3 major leagues have stepped up and presented letters to the court stating their concern over the precendent this rulling may set. In the end, it certainly looks like compromise is going to be the word of the day. The 'yotes stay in Arizona for next season, at least, to apease the NHL schedulers, and, barring another buyer stepping up, the team is moved the following off-season, to either Hamilton, where Balsillie wants them, or Winnipeg, where the league does. Or, by some other means of appeasement, Ballsillie ponies up the money for a new stadium in Hamilton (maybe with taxpayer assistance), and the team plays in Phoenix until that barn is built. Just my opinion on how this looks like it will pan out...

May 20, 2009  09:10 AM ET

I have learned one thing through all this.... bettman is even capable of souring my liking of the nhl, not the sport just the league and how its run.... constantly lying to the fans about the stability of franchises and shutting the door on great ideas because it wasnt part of "the plan".... forget the plan and do what is right for the league...

May 20, 2009  09:21 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

have learned one thing through all this.... bettman is even capable of souring my liking of the nhl, not the sport just the league

That happened to me long ago. How many compromises must be made to the NHL fan, how much must they screw with the game to attempt to lure in fringe fans who simply don't care and won't be converted?

Is this league for the established fans, or is it for borderline fans?

May 20, 2009  09:25 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

I have learned one thing through all this.... bettman is even capable of souring my liking of the nhl, not the sport just the league and how its run.... constantly lying to the fans about the stability of franchises and shutting the door on great ideas because it wasnt part of "the plan".... forget the plan and do what is right for the league...

That's just the problem I think with Bettman. He is all business. To my knowledge, he never played the game when he was younger. Doesn't know the love of it, personally. Yes, you obviously have to have Commissioner of the NHL well-educated and know what he is doing on the business side of it. But he isn't thinking of the fans, because I am not sure ever was one. (Again, I can't be sure). It is just how it is going to be.

May 20, 2009  09:31 AM ET

Something else DWI, I hate how the Commissioner (in all leagues) is basically just a hired gun by the owners. They are only interested in what is best for the owners, not what is best for the game, and the hell with the fans.

Have he Commissioner work for the league, and have the owners hire a head of their "union".

May 20, 2009  09:35 AM ET

The article fails to point out that the other issue of 'relocation' will not be discussed in court until June 22nd by the Judge...That makes it pretty tough for the Yotes to play anywhere next season. The Judge sends them to mediation to try to decide who has control...Hahahaha...that's just plain out funny considering the parties involved & issues at hand. Of course the precedent issue for the sports leagues is at the heart of the matter.
Hamilton may not be as rosy a location as many imagine it will be...

May 20, 2009  09:42 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

That's just the problem I think with Bettman. He is all business. To my knowledge, he never played the game when he was younger. Doesn't know the love of it, personally. But he isn't thinking of the fans, because I am not sure ever was one. (Again, I can't be sure).

Well if you wanted some clarity on the issue of Bettman playing the game or being a fan...
Someone handed Gary a puck once before he became commissioner and Gary tried to open it. :)

May 20, 2009  09:48 AM ET

To paraphrase a cheesy ABC TV show, "Commisioner...Move That Team!" :P

May 20, 2009  10:49 AM ET

Are we trying to turn this in to a golf concept? The team with the lowest revenue wins? Please, take my yearly 13 million operating loss, I wouldn't possibly want to be in the black, red is much prettier.

Comment #12 has been removed
May 20, 2009  02:45 PM ET

This season will be like the last season the Jets had in the Peg before moving to Phoenix. Then after the season, the Coyotes will be back in Winnipeg.

May 20, 2009  03:55 PM ET

I have no problem with they 'Yotes moving, I have a problem with the way Moyes is going about it.
You can't sell your franchise without the governing bodies approval (just like McDonalds, you have to 'buy' the franchise from the parent company).

 
May 22, 2009  08:31 PM ET

Hamilton, just like Phoenix, is a bad location for a hockey team from a league standpoint (the city lies within the 50 mile radius of both Toronto and Buffalo) and also a demographic standpoint. I did some research on this when I was in university and the Kitchener-Waterloo region is ideal for a hockey team as it fits well within the Carolina model (a regional team with larger fan base than the host city) and has a better financial demographic than Hamilton - KW is home to RIM, and the headquarters of some of the largest insurance companies in Canada. Also, Ontario is a hockey hotbed much larger than any of the failed experiments in football country (I also looked at this as well in the study). The simple fact is the NHL has some major dollars invested in these football cities (Tampa, Miami, Nashville, Phoenix) and to yank these franchises from those cities to other locations means failure and ultimately acknowledging hockey is a regional game, and not a truly national game in the vision that Bettman and the NHL view it to be. While I agree there should be another team in southern Ontario, I do disagree with how this is being done. Doing an end run around the NHL office does not win one friends within that office. But at the same time, the NHL has to admit its experiment in four these four heavy football cities has failed and has to come to a different way o thinking.
Oh and Winnipeg isn't an option for the simple fact the Jets/Coyotes originated in Winnipeg and to put them back there would be an even bigger embarrassment to the NHL because the NHL would have to admit Winnipeg was a perfectly acceptable hockey city all along and their talk of supporting struggling cities would be nothing more than lip-service.
From a financial and growing the game standpoint, it makes sense on all sides that at least one team from the aforementioned football cities relocates to Canada, and that first location being Kitchener-Waterloo.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Chargers accuse McDaniels of trash talk
    Views
    25417
    Comments
    2807
  2. 2
    Source: Damon won't take pay cut
    Views
    50442
    Comments
    971
  3. 3
    Cowher to Bears or Texans?
    Views
    17286
    Comments
    361
  4. 4
    Yankees to cut down on spending
    Views
    1087
    Comments
    356
  5. 5
    Should Notre Dame join Big Ten?
    Views
    21546
    Comments
    246

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    What happens if Bama and UT…
    Views
    443
    Replies
    34
  2. MMA > General MMA

    Arlovski's next fight -…
    Views
    355
    Replies
    12
  3. NCAAF > Ohio State Buckeyes

    Season Analysis
    Views
    269
    Replies
    34

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos