Truth & Rumors > MLB

Nats bats could be moved for D

Views
25611
Comments
32

07:42 AM ET 07.19 | Lack of production from their 3-4-5 spots may have the Nationals ready to deal. Adam Dunn, cooling off after a long tear, struck out twice on Sunday and left five men on base. Josh Willingham also left that many men on base, his three-run double on Friday the only exception to a long weekend for the left fielder. ... Maybe this is part of the reason general manager Mike Rizzo is at least open to trade offers for two of his three sluggers (Dunn and Willingham) -- because the Nationals aren't winning many games with them in the lineup. If they've got an offense that's supposed to be this good, and it's led to numbers in the bottom third of the NL all season, why not at least consider the possibility of selling off a couple parts and trying to win another way -- perhaps by improving the NL's worst defensive team?

masn.com

Adam Dunn, Getty Images Adam Dunn, Getty Images
July 19, 2010  09:00 AM ET

Selling of players doesn't help them build anything. They aren't a contender this year, but they ahve a chance to build something for the next couple of years. That won't happen if they sell off Dunn and/or Willingham.

July 19, 2010  09:46 AM ET

If they are losing games 2-0 & 1-0, how does improving their defense help to score runs? Does getting more prospects for Dunn and Willingham help them score runs?

July 19, 2010  09:52 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Selling of players doesn't help them build anything. They aren't a contender this year, but they ahve a chance to build something for the next couple of years. That won't happen if they sell off Dunn and/or Willingham.

Problem is, there is no help on the way. Rated one of the five worst farm systems in baseball by Baseball America.
So, unless they want to go big time in FA, they really have little choice.

July 19, 2010  09:55 AM ET

dunn to the mets (at least now the mets have some decient young players to deal)

July 19, 2010  10:02 AM ET
QUOTE(#3):

Problem is, there is no help on the way. Rated one of the five worst farm systems in baseball by Baseball America.So, unless they want to go big time in FA, they really have little choice.

Why not go big time in free agency. They have a chance to build something special for the future. DC is not a small market, they could and should add to that payroll. They may have to extend themselves a little bit, but in the long run it could very well be worth it..........they may never have this chance again.

July 19, 2010  10:12 AM ET

BERKMAN AND OSWALT TO THE YANKEES FOR A FEW MINOR LEAGUERS BUT NOT MONTERO OR ROMINE CAUSE THEY ARE TAKING ON SALARY

July 19, 2010  10:28 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

BERKMAN AND OSWALT TO THE YANKEES FOR A FEW MINOR LEAGUERS BUT NOT MONTERO OR ROMINE CAUSE THEY ARE TAKING ON SALARY

Who cares.....

July 19, 2010  10:36 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

Why not go big time in free agency. They have a chance to build something special for the future. DC is not a small market, they could and should add to that payroll. They may have to extend themselves a little bit, but in the long run it could very well be worth it..........they may never have this chance again.

But they do share that market with Baltimore, which is a problem.

July 19, 2010  10:37 AM ET

Dunn is going to test FA anyway, so they might as well dump him. He fell in their lap when the FA market collapsed 2 years ago and they got him at a nice discount. I doubt that will happen again unless Dunn just falls apart in the second half.

July 19, 2010  10:39 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

BERKMAN AND OSWALT TO THE YANKEES FOR A FEW MINOR LEAGUERS BUT NOT MONTERO OR ROMINE CAUSE THEY ARE TAKING ON SALARY

Two established pros for Yankee scraps. That sounds fair. I think Houston would do it in a heartbeat.

July 19, 2010  11:00 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

Why not go big time in free agency. They have a chance to build something special for the future. DC is not a small market, they could and should add to that payroll. They may have to extend themselves a little bit, but in the long run it could very well be worth it..........they may never have this chance again.

That is the only other option. And takes some real cohones.

July 19, 2010  11:02 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

Two established pros for Yankee scraps. That sounds fair. I think Houston would do it in a heartbeat.

The Yankees do not want Oswalt. They would be stuck with him next year. They want that spot and the big bucks saved for Lee next year.
Starters are not their problem, they are looking for bull pen help.

July 19, 2010  11:15 AM ET

Me thinks that Nats would continue to lose with the Gas House Gang & Murderer's Row in their lineup. Gotta have pitching

July 19, 2010  11:27 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

Two established pros for Yankee scraps. That sounds fair. I think Houston would do it in a heartbeat.

I don't even know why the Yankees would do it.

Oswalt would be an average pitcher in the AL East.

July 19, 2010  11:37 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

Why not go big time in free agency. They have a chance to build something special for the future. DC is not a small market, they could and should add to that payroll. They may have to extend themselves a little bit, but in the long run it could very well be worth it..........they may never have this chance again.

For who? Unless you're the Yankees and can afford to spend your mistakes away going big in free agency has been an expensive, and losing proposition. Fans love big free agents signings because it's an overt symbol that the team is DOING something, even though it rarely pays off.

The way to build is from within, with cheap, cost-controlled talent that you can supplement with a few free agents. The Nationals have JUST started to do that with Rizzo doing some nice work after the Bowden abomination.

Dunn and Willingham are not going to be a part of the next good-great Nats team, it's a no brainer to unload them.

July 19, 2010  01:13 PM ET
QUOTE(#16):

For who? Unless you're the Yankees and can afford to spend your mistakes away going big in free agency has been an expensive, and losing proposition. Fans love big free agents signings because it's an overt symbol that the team is DOING something, even though it rarely pays off.The way to build is from within, with cheap, cost-controlled talent that you can supplement with a few free agents. The Nationals have JUST started to do that with Rizzo doing some nice work after the Bowden abomination. Dunn and Willingham are not going to be a part of the next good-great Nats team, it's a no brainer to unload them.

Dunn would be out of there by the time they can build a contener anyways.
Not that easy to find a willing partner. They value him more than other teams. That is why he is there. No big interest when he was a FA. The Nats were the only team to offer him money.

July 19, 2010  01:16 PM ET

I'd like to see Willingham in a Braves uniform.

July 19, 2010  01:29 PM ET
QUOTE(#19):

I'd like to see Willingham in a Braves uniform.

You'd probably also like to see him in assless chaps.

July 19, 2010  01:39 PM ET

Dunn to Mets? Willingham to Braves? I'd be shocked to see Nats trade them within the division. I see Dunn as the one more likely to move. But Nats should not assume that they will lose their Free Agents. They are well positioned (ball park, potential fan base) to build a winner and they don't have to do a fire sale to cut any assumed future losses.

 
July 19, 2010  02:50 PM ET

I thought the Nats had good young arms...not the best or most reliable offense. the pieces they added may have some pop but also have flaws.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    No lock for Lakers, Howard intrigued by Houston
    Views
    2292
    Comments
    1802
  2. 2
    Mattingly won't last the week
    Views
    10036
    Comments
    534
  3. 3
    Howard aired D'Antoni grievances with Lakers
    Views
    7390
    Comments
    262
  4. 4
    Sens' OT hero had fiberglass shards removed from face
    Views
    1976
    Comments
    90
  5. 5
    Garrett digging in against Jerry
    Views
    18546
    Comments
    78

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos