Truth & Rumors > NFL

Titans wearing out their meal ticket?

Views
51333
Comments
70

07:55 AM ET 08.12 | After more than 600 carries in two years and more than 400 touches in 2009, it may be worth asking the question. Unless the Titans show more discretion and keep him out of harm's way more often, aren't they shortening Chris Johnson's career? In a perfect world, the Titans would find other ways to move the ball, thus adding years to Johnson's career. This just in: It's not a perfect world. "We want to win games. C.J.'s going to help us win games," Coach Jeff Fisher said. "... When he's tired, we'll back him down. When he can go, we're going to keep feeding it to him."

The Tennessean

Chris Johnson, AP Chris Johnson, AP
August 12, 2010  07:59 AM ET

Such is the life of a stud running back...

August 12, 2010  08:04 AM ET
QUOTE:

He wants it, so give him the rock.... 2500 yards rushing or attempting to, is going to take its toll one way or another though.

Exactly.

August 12, 2010  08:08 AM ET

If you pay him then play him. He could have been something else.

August 12, 2010  08:10 AM ET

In New England, which has been a pass-oriented offense for as long as I can remember, running backs don't last very long at all. I can't remember the last starting RB who went two seasons without significant down time. (Yeah, Kevin Faulk, but he's a 3rd down situational back.)

Better for the RB to be in a run-run-run offense. They have to build the line to accomodate that, and with a run-first line the RB is going to survive longer.

August 12, 2010  08:12 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

In New England, which has been a pass-oriented offense for as long as I can remember, running backs don't last very long at all. I can't remember the last starting RB who went two seasons without significant down time. (Yeah, Kevin Faulk, but he's a 3rd down situational back.)Better for the RB to be in a run-run-run offense. They have to build the line to accomodate that, and with a run-first line the RB is going to survive longer.

Good point. Kinda 'Use it or lose it'.

August 12, 2010  08:17 AM ET

He's already racked up more carries in his first two years than Terrell Davis had during his first two. His holdout for more money makes sense if you remember that Davis only had 4 productive years and never had a good year after going over 2000 yards on 392 carries in 2008.

August 12, 2010  08:22 AM ET

Is this is why RBs need to get as much money as they can as soon as they can.

August 12, 2010  08:22 AM ET

"And this is why..."

Sorry, I need to learn how to type.

August 12, 2010  08:23 AM ET
QUOTE(#7):

He's already racked up more carries in his first two years than Terrell Davis had during his first two. His holdout for more money makes sense if you remember that Davis only had 4 productive years and never had a good year after going over 2000 yards on 392 carries in 2008.

1998, not 2008. Sometimes the coffee just doesn't get there fast enough.

August 12, 2010  08:36 AM ET

That's the point when you have a stud running back. Their prime years are very short so use it while you can. My only problem....PAY these guys. They take, probably, the most damage of any other players in the NFL. Pay them and then give them the rock. If they only last 5 - 7 seasons, help the team win games, AND get paid to boot, it's a win, win situation all around.

August 12, 2010  08:38 AM ET

They probably are. Get ready to see him as your pool maintaince person in two years.

August 12, 2010  08:58 AM ET
QUOTE(#7):

His holdout for more money makes sense if you remember that Davis only had 4 productive years and never had a good year after going over 2000 yards on 392 carries in 2008.

Also...the hold out is over. it's unclear if this guy knows that... The deal is done.

August 12, 2010  09:07 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

They probably are. Get ready to see him as your pool maintaince person in two years.

OUCH

Comment #15 has been removed
August 12, 2010  10:11 AM ET

CJ is going to get the ball A LOT. Take advantage while the Titans can. Looking forward to him getting at least 2500 total yards, again.

August 12, 2010  10:34 AM ET

"Saving" running backs makes no sense. They're done at +/-30 whether they run 15 times a game or 25 times a game, so may as well run like hell while he has the legs.

August 12, 2010  10:41 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Such is the life of a stud running back...

word

August 12, 2010  10:42 AM ET

Well it goes both ways, You want all this money? Work for it!!

August 12, 2010  10:44 AM ET

I've heard this discussion with Larry Johnson and Jamaal Anderson. People used to say that they'd be fine after 400 carries in a season. Those guys were never the same. This could be a sign of bad things to come with Chris Johnson.

 
August 12, 2010  10:54 AM ET

There's definitely a Faustian health-for-money alchemy in football. CJ knows his time is too short to have no financial guarantees. It would almost make sense for all rookie running back to have contracts loaded with incentive clauses that pay megabucks for production (e.g. 2,000 yds) that way, they can never get screwed, even if they have bare-bones rookie signing bonus and base pay. Would also save owners the risk of paying a guy stupid guaranteed money after the fact.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Stunned Cavs open to dealing top pick
    Views
    7507
    Comments
    1484
  2. 2
    Mavs shopping pick, eyeing Howard (and CP3)
    Views
    4570
    Comments
    541
  3. 3
    Duquette's luck running out
    Views
    3219
    Comments
    515
  4. 4
    Donnie Baseball trying to get himself fired
    Views
    4356
    Comments
    438
  5. 5
    Namath: Jets wasted Smith pick
    Views
    30664
    Comments
    95

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos