The last place NHL players want to play

How times have changed.

with the Isle you are talking about bad building, bad ownership, coaching changes - and the team likely to be moved in a few years

Those questions were asked to Oilers and Islanders!

It's not surprising really. Who what's to play where there's a lot of Snow?

And in the same poll Rotten Ronnie Wilson was "selected" as the coach they would leastlikely want to play for. He beat out Torts by a wide margin.

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 08:55 AM ET  01.31 by Canuck eh?

It's not surprising really. Who s a lot of Snow?

wants

The Islanders coulnd't fill their poor excuse for an arena, even with 2 beers & 2 corn dogs for $4 night...

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 08:45 AM ET  01.31 by THE BISHOP!

How times have changed.

Isn't that the truth?

QUOTE(#5):

Originally posted 09:39 AM ET  01.31 by Canuck eh?

And in the same poll Rotten Ronnie Wilson was "selected" as the coach they would leastlikely want to play for. He beat out Torts by a wide margin.

Mike Keenan must not have been included in the poll

The Islanders have a hard time half filling their poor excuse of an arena, even with "2 beers & 2 corndogs for $4" night...

think back to the early/mid 80's - the idea that the Oil and the Islanders - the Cup Dynasty teams would now be in this "state"

I was also not aware that Edmonton's arena was in bad shape

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 10:33 AM ET  01.31 by BrownsBucksBlueJackets

think back to the early/mid 80's - the idea that the Oil and the Islanders - the Cup Dynasty teams would now be in this "state"I was also not aware that Edmonton's arena was in bad shape

I think the Oilers and Islanders play in the two oldest arena's left in the league.

QUOTE(#9):

Originally posted 10:31 AM ET  01.31 by BrownsBucksBlueJackets

Mike Keenan must not have been included in the poll

Surprisingly he was. I think he was 5th. So you know Wilson's setting the bar really high.

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 10:33 AM ET  01.31 by BrownsBucksBlueJackets

think back to the early/mid 80's - the idea that the Oil and the Islanders - the Cup Dynasty teams would now be in this "state"I was also not aware that Edmonton's arena was in bad shape

It isn't really. It's just ancient, outlived it's suggested lifespan. And dead on about the 80s teams. Really sad state for two teams that combined won more cups than stadium-fillers like Philly, Toronto, Boston, Chicago, NYR, Vancouver, Buffalo, etc. have nearly won combined since expansion.

Isles i understand but Edm??? Thats just stupid.Solid ownership,clear plan,good coach,3 or 4 young stars in place,intensely loyal and loving fan base,and your just 2 hours and 45 minutes away from the home of the Mighty Flames-win win

QUOTE(#13):

Originally posted 10:57 AM ET  01.31 by Canuck eh?

Surprisingly he was. I think he was 5th. So you know Wilson's setting the bar really high.

wow - well I guess if you are going to be #1 ....

hahahahahahaha

QUOTE(#15):

Originally posted 11:07 AM ET  01.31 by Harry Crack

Isles i understand but Edm??? Thats just stupid.Solid ownership,clear plan,good coach,3 or 4 young stars in place,intensely loyal and loving fan base,and your just 2 hours and 45 minutes away from the home of the Mighty Flames-win win

Many pros. But one big con: You gotta live in Edmonton. A friend currently living there had this status on Facebook this morning: "Hooray for -35." Nuff said.

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 08:55 AM ET  01.31 by Canuck eh?

It's not surprising really. Who what's to play where there's a lot of Snow?

Especially Garth

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 08:55 AM ET  01.31 by Canuck eh?

It's not surprising really. Who what's to play where there's a lot of Snow?

Yes, specifically Garth

This article has the top 5. Thrashers 3 (7%), Leafs 4 (5%), and Panthers 5 (2%).