Ex-Cane Highsmith may sue NCAA

good luck with that buddy.

I think the kids can transfer without sitting out can' they? If so, the NCAA would be doing them a favor.

Typical, another CANE in court, lol.

BTW, Highsmith didn't bring another but his son to U of M. lol. Typical Highsmith.

By all the new names, I must have missed a real doozy of a b-ball thread. DANG!

Oh yea, he should just sue his old dealer from back in the day, for pinchin' on all those bags he bought.

QUOTE(#6):

Originally posted 09:03 AM ET  08.20 by PAPA ROCKS

By all the new names, I must have missed a real doozy of a b-ball thread. DANG!Oh yea, he should just sue his old dealer from back in the day, for pinchin' on all those bags he bought.

Papa, do you think they will be able to field a team to play us? I think they are gonna have to suspend every current player named by Shapiro.

QUOTE(#10):

Originally posted 09:28 AM ET  08.20 by 12-0 deal with it (BB9)

Papa, do you think they will be able to field a team to play us? I think they are gonna have to suspend every current player named by Shapiro.

How many players, on any team, have th NCAA suspended while the investigation was still pending? Not many...

so his kid would have never gone to college if he didn't play football?.....I guess he misses having his name in the paper

Wouldn't thst be great penalty for a school: that any/all of the scholarship athletes have the option to transfer to another school, any school, without losing any eligibilty?

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 08:52 AM ET  08.20 by Moudz

they all went to USC for the right reasons. what a dumassssssssssssss.

Highsmith said "All those kids that went to USC for all the right reasons had to suffer the consequences". I read it has "all of the good kids that went to USC for all the right reasons had to suffer the consequences. IMO, why should "all" of the good kids have to suffer for what an idiot like Bush did?

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 09:39 AM ET  08.20 by SL Guido

How many players, on any team, have th NCAA suspended while the investigation was still pending? Not many...

Guido, it is the self-imposed pre-emptive suspension that I am referring to. What Miami has to ask itself is what if we play guys who are eventually found ineligible? Well if they didn't play then you don't have to forfeit the games they played in. This was the same situation that Auburn was in when they asked the NCAA to give them the quickie ruling on Cam Newton. Remember they "suspended" Cam for a day and asked the NCAA to rule on him?

QUOTE(#15):

Originally posted 09:57 AM ET  08.20 by 12-0 deal with it (BB9)

Guido, it is the self-imposed pre-emptive suspension that I am referring to. What Miami has to ask itself is what if we play guys who are eventually found ineligible? Well if they didn't play then you don't have to forfeit the games they played in. This was the same situation that Auburn was in when they asked the NCAA to give them the quickie ruling on Cam Newton. Remember they "suspended" Cam for a day and asked the NCAA to rule on him?

Yes, but the CN investigation is still ongoing. If you asked for a quickie ruling now, I think the ncaa would rule all are eligible, because they move so slow and usually won't have a negative ruling until they feel they have a slam dunk case. And, if as an AD you have the option of taking your chances with 30 players, don't you think they'd take it? Think of the revenue lost in ticket sales and the like vs a vacated win? With all that may be looming, a vacated win is peanuts.

Plus, since when has the u taken the high road.

Huh? Alonzo just need to keep quiet on this. We all saw the 30 for 30. What Nevin did was probably tame compared to what happened during his time.

reading between the lines...'In my day the NCAA looked the other way, so I am going to fight the NCAA to do so again.'

QUOTE(#17):

Originally posted 10:12 AM ET  08.20 by colonel

Just put an 0 in the middle and you got DOG now instead of DC.

Yeah but FJJ can't use di<k anymore!