Saban campaigning for Alabama?

No, Saban is saying that Houston should play in the BCS championship game.

QUOTE(#2):

Originally posted 08:30 AM ET  11.29 by colonel

If the BCS is working right, isn't that what everyone wants, for it to work right, then if it does and it pits 1 vs 2, then what is the problem, the system works.

They already played. Bama had their shot at LSU at Bryant Denny. However, whoelse is it going to be besides Bama?

QUOTE(#2):

Originally posted 08:30 AM ET  11.29 by colonel

If the BCS is working right, isn't that what everyone wants, for it to work right, then if it does and it pits 1 vs 2, then what is the problem, the system works.

No, the suits behind the BCS want it to work like they want it to work and designed it that way. When the best two teams meet to suit their whims, then yeah, they want it to work the way they designed it. When it doesn't get their pets in, they don't want it to work.

QUOTE(#2):

Originally posted 08:30 AM ET  11.29 by colonel

If the BCS is working right, isn't that what everyone wants, for it to work right, then if it does and it pits 1 vs 2, then what is the problem, the system works.

Colonel just because the "flawed" BCS says the LSU and Bama are #1 and #2, doesn't necessary make it so and mean " the system works"!!! :-)

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 08:33 AM ET  11.29 by BS&B:TrustInO-6

They already played. Bama had their shot at LSU at Bryant Denny. However, whoelse is it going to be besides Bama?

Bama lost to LSU, end of story!!! Give Houston, Boise State, Stanford or Okie (if they beat OU) Lite a chance, or even Georgia if they beat LSU.

QUOTE(#7):

Originally posted 08:39 AM ET  11.29 by brotha68

but, too subjective.

This exactly...it will never be objective without the playoff.

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 08:42 AM ET  11.29 by brotha68

But, it's the manner in which they're created which causes the problem.

Exactly again....

...you're on a roll this morning counselor!

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 08:40 AM ET  11.29 by brotha68

You're just describing the subjectivity that has ALWAYS existed in college football...... this isn't anything new.When has the system worked any differently? It was the same with the AP/UPI poll and bowl tie-ins. So, what's different now?Other than smaller schools have less of a chance than ever of competing for the "title".

Bro, you are right, but it doesn't mean that the system can't change!!!

QUOTE(#13):

Originally posted 08:46 AM ET  11.29 by colonel

It can't be flawed, and it is your system too, it is the state of the ark system of the NCAA, it has to be right.<hard to say that with a straight face>

sarcastic old fart!

QUOTE(#15):

Originally posted 08:48 AM ET  11.29 by The Oldtimer

Bro, you are right, but it doesn't mean that the system can't change!!!

OT, you are right. They system sucks. I'll help you change it. Change is good. You go first.

QUOTE(#7):

Originally posted 08:39 AM ET  11.29 by brotha68

We can all look and make suggestions... but, too subjective.

"subjective" is the key word!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!