Truth & Rumors > NCAAF

Saban happy to offer four-year scholarships

Views
4398
Comments
75

08:10 AM ET 02.29 | As the process played out, Nick Saban held his tongue. On Feb. 18, the member institutions that comprise NCAA Division I voted narrowly not to rescind legislation that allows schools to offer multiyear scholarships instead of strictly offering renewable one-year scholarships. It was by the slimmest of margins, but multiyear scholarships survived. That, in turn, led to dire predictions of a Tower of Babel situation, with every school making different offers to recruits in an impossible-to-decipher jumble of various terms and limits. Nick Saban doesn't see that happening. "We're going to offer four-year scholarships," Saban said. "Our whole conference is going to do it, all the schools, I think. And we're happy to do it."

Rivals.com

Nick Saban, Getty Images Nick Saban, Getty Images
February 29, 2012  08:17 AM ET

Just doesn't like being limited on the number of them that can be offered.

February 29, 2012  08:40 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Just doesn't like being limited on the number of them that can be offered.

drum roll please........

February 29, 2012  08:41 AM ET

"We're going to offer four-year scholarships," Saban said. "Kids will just have to pay their first two years before they'll kick in."

Comment #4 has been removed
February 29, 2012  08:48 AM ET

translation - we can afford four-year medical scholarships for those that don't pan out

February 29, 2012  08:54 AM ET

All scholarships should be for four years. OR, they should be treated like any contract and the player can move on and play without penalty if that contract is not renewed.
What the NCAA does now would be illegal anywhere else.

February 29, 2012  09:04 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

Just doesn't like being limited on the number of them that can be offered.

Kudos for Saban, it will be a big change considering he's signed 114 in the last 4 years.

February 29, 2012  09:11 AM ET

It doesn't say everything he said. He said they have to make grades and they have to adhere to the rules.... which basically is the same guideline every other team uses.

But that mean ol' Sabenz has somethin' up his sleeve, he does.

Comment #9 has been removed
February 29, 2012  09:44 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

they won't stop it only help to create new ways around the intent of the rules.

The "intent" is to find gray area, and not just Satan, but all of them!!!

February 29, 2012  09:48 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

oh he will still sign that many or more. 4 year schollies, 85 limits, 25 year. they won't stop it only help to create new ways around the intent of the rules.

West Tx math tells me 25+25+25+25 = 100, given no redshirts.

February 29, 2012  09:54 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

West Tx math tells me 25+25+25+25 = 100, given no redshirts.

Hey, I resemble that remark.

February 29, 2012  10:23 AM ET

My memory is not what it used to be, but I could have sworn I got a 4 year scholarship way back in 78.

February 29, 2012  10:25 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

The "intent" is to find gray area, and not just Satan, but all of them!!!

True dat. Bo was saying it is all just different wording, it was funny because you could see him getting pizzed when they kept asking about it.

Comment #15 has been removed
February 29, 2012  10:29 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

The "intent" is to find gray area, and not just Satan, but all of them!!!

Nuh uh! Only the mean ol Sabenz does anything like finding gray areas.

February 29, 2012  10:34 AM ET
QUOTE(#15):

Saban got CHIZZED.... This is more to do w/ Auburn doing it.. and UF following suit..key words:Our whole conference is going to do it, all the schools, I think. And we're happy to do it."

No, no, somehow that mean ol' Sabenz will beat the system in the gray areas. :)

Some of the comments locally bordered on the ridiculous about the so-called 4 year scholarship.

February 29, 2012  10:37 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

All scholarships should be for four years. OR, they should be treated like any contract and the player can move on and play without penalty if that contract is not renewed.What the NCAA does now would be illegal anywhere else.

agreed.

Comment #19 has been removed
 
February 29, 2012  10:53 AM ET
QUOTE(#19):

I am sure...You know how TD is.. prob the same people..My fav was... now what excuse Chiz will use on personal visits to the mom/dad...If you can find a loophole.. whats the prob right

Well, LUS, you know as well as I know, that players are rarely just "cut" which is what this is "supposed" to stop.

Your team and my team have several guys that would have been cut if the only criteria was "they're not producing on the field". I can name about 4-5 guys right now that would be gone tomorrow, if that were the case.

I do know locally this very thing was said "It shows that we care about the player unlike that mean ol' Sabenz who doesn't care about his players." Now, I was the one who used mean ol Sabenz, but the rest is exactly what was said. Which is ridiculous. If anyone thinks their coach "cares" for their players any more than the average next coach, they are living in lala land.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    LeBron lacking key champion component
    Views
    2635
    Comments
    1373
  2. 2
    Youkilis headed in reverse
    Views
    7863
    Comments
    214
  3. 3
    Garden ice under fire
    Views
    2576
    Comments
    105
  4. 4
    Tide's room gets a waterfall
    Views
    8006
    Comments
    101
  5. 5
    Was Crosby robbed of Hart?
    Views
    5116
    Comments
    94

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos