Truth & Rumors > MLB

Red Sox to sign Wakefield's catcher

Views
144
Comments
-1

The Red Sox are close to consummating a one-year deal to bring back backup catcher Doug Mirabelli for the 2008 season. With the backup catching (and overall catching) markets slim pickings this offseason, the Sox bring back the catcher who has been with the team since the 2001 season (other than a brief stint with the Padres, when he was traded away and traded back). Mirabelli has served as Tim Wakefield's personal catcher for his tenure with the Red Sox, which has bolstered his value, especially given his declining offensive numbers.

Boston Globe

Doug Mirabelli , Ronald Martinez/Getty Images Doug Mirabelli , Ronald Martinez/Getty Images
January 11, 2008  07:02 AM ET

Who caught Wakefield before 2001? I dont know anything about a knuckle ball but is it really that hard for Varitek to learn how to catch him? Can it be taught? I know I have seen Varitek try and boy it was not pretty at all. But thats what most catchers say. Eucker was the guy who said, When you try to catch it just wait till it hits the ground and stops moving.

January 11, 2008  08:00 AM ET

varitek could probably learn, but he can't catch every game, so why bother - and yes, it has been a total disaster when he's tried. If only doug could learn to put his **** into his swing, he could start hitting over .124, then again, maybe not ;)

January 11, 2008  08:02 AM ET

As long as the Sox's keep Wakefield they might as well keep Mirabelli. They tried another catcher and it didn't work out. I just hope his batting average goes up, I think he is around the .200 mark.

January 11, 2008  08:08 AM ET

yeah, I didn't give him enough credit, he batted .202. The last catcher they tried decided it was easier to retire than try to catch wakefield.

January 11, 2008  08:27 AM ET

who was it that said some thing to the effect that you try and knock it down and then chase after it"?
Those ain't the exact words but I think you catch my drift.

January 11, 2008  08:39 AM ET

"consummating" was the appropriate verb choice for this worthless story

January 11, 2008  09:07 AM ET

I hate my life...I only get to consumate twice a year...worse than being in prison

January 11, 2008  09:07 AM ET

The Sox need a young catcher to groom asap.

January 11, 2008  09:12 AM ET

agreed hyper, they have no one.

January 11, 2008  09:29 AM ET

Those ain't the exact words but I think you catch my drift.
4192jc

I believe you are talking about Bob Eucker?

January 11, 2008  09:31 AM ET

This is the formula,
Take your biggest bopper in the minors and stick him behind homeplate. Add 1 year in the minors, two years in the majors behind a veteran catcher, stir, viola!

January 11, 2008  09:31 AM ET

yes, I am talking about Mr. Uecker. (spelling is optional)

January 11, 2008  10:18 AM ET

"Wait until it stops rolling and pick it up." - on how to catch a knuckleball

I had to find the exact quote. doh!

January 11, 2008  10:46 AM ET

Good quote.

January 11, 2008  11:22 AM ET

if they let mirabelli bat with his shin guards on he would..he just goes up there takes his three hacks and sits down...no gloves, pine tar, or glory..gotta love it...because every now and then one of his three hacks sends one sailing over the monster

but no likely results in a 3-swing strikeout

January 11, 2008  12:29 PM ET

ok, 20 comments on a mirabelli thread is excessive.

January 11, 2008  01:05 PM ET

unecessary surplus

January 11, 2008  01:05 PM ET

waste not..want not

January 11, 2008  01:12 PM ET

I think wakefield should deal with the catcher the red sox has ... All the red sox are are a much of babys and they cant deal with things.. Speaking as a True Yankee fan the pitchers dont have a problem with there catcher and they dont pick who is going catch for them .. I think the red sox players are a much of babys, And wakefield pitches like a little boy playing little league

 
January 11, 2008  01:24 PM ET

uh, Yankee1fan... not true... Mussina is a big baby when he does not have his choice of catcher. And, I seem to remember Torre moving around the catchers for more than one other pitcher because he or they didn't get along with Posada. And if the Yanks had a knuckleballer the likes of Wakefield you better believe they would find someone who could be that special caddy. And one last thing, Jorge is not the best in stopping wide pitches. I have seen Posada cost a pitcher more than one or two wild pitches that should have been at least knocked down.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Agent: 'Extraordinary' interest in Bay
    Views
    6173
    Comments
    1892
  2. 2
    Vikings to consider L.A. move?
    Views
    67282
    Comments
    1880
  3. 3
    Bills owner wanted Gruden
    Views
    35842
    Comments
    345
  4. 4
    Mayo rebukes Bruschi's Belichick knock
    Views
    45656
    Comments
    265
  5. 5
    Can Iverson lure LeBron to Knicks?
    Views
    10727
    Comments
    178

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Are college football coaches…
    Views
    337
    Replies
    51
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    CFB Game Day 11/21/2009
    Views
    206
    Replies
    103
  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Pac-10's Tough Schedule
    Views
    135
    Replies
    19

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos