Blackhawks asked about Doan

"Like most of the league..." says it all. Another non story

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 09:06 AM ET  07.14 by drysdale

"Like most of the league..." says it all. Another non story

About the only team I can think of that didn't ask about Doan is the Phoenix Coyotes.

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 09:14 AM ET  07.14 by roamer

About the only team I can think of that didn't ask about Doan is the Phoenix Coyotes.

That's pretty damn funny

Hawks have been going downhill since the Cup, doubt he even considers it.

Stan Bowman is in a holding pattern. Explains it all.

*bangs head on desk*

According to a report yesterday an Eastern conference team offered Doan 4 yrs/30 mil. I say waaahhhhhhh

I wouldn't mind seeing Doan on the Blackhawks.

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 11:48 AM ET  07.14 by Nard Dog

According to a report yesterday an Eastern conference team offered Doan 4 yrs/30 mil. I say waaahhhhhhh

that's flat out crazy.

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 11:48 AM ET  07.14 by Nard Dog

According to a report yesterday an Eastern conference team offered Doan 4 yrs/30 mil. I say waaahhhhhhh

7.5 per? Holy crap that's nuts...no way is he worth that

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 11:48 AM ET  07.14 by Nard Dog

According to a report yesterday an Eastern conference team offered Doan 4 yrs/30 mil. I say waaahhhhhhh

If its my Rangers id do that deal. I saw 3 years 7.5. Just enought time for the young studs to step up. Little overpaid but so what. beats trading for Nash. He makes more and you have to give up assets.

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 12:19 PM ET  07.14 by mhwings

7.5 per? Holy crap that's nuts...no way is he worth that

One hat-trick his whole career, but is a 300 goal scorer. Why leave a team that thinks you're 'C' material? Heard it's the Flyers offering big money.

QUOTE(#12):

Originally posted 12:22 PM ET  07.14 by Buc Fettman

If its my Rangers id do that deal. I saw 3 years 7.5. Just enought time for the young studs to step up. Little overpaid but so what.

That assumes the Rangers have some young studs. Maybe assuming too much?

QUOTE(#12):

Originally posted 12:22 PM ET  07.14 by Buc Fettman

If its my Rangers id do that deal. I saw 3 years 7.5. Just enought time for the young studs to step up. Little overpaid but so what. beats trading for Nash. He makes more and you have to give up assets.

So you would take an over 35 contract and pay a guy 7.5 mil a yr no matter what for 4 more years? He was 50 point scorer last year. So even if he stayed even the next few years, that still leaves you paying 7.5 for a 30-40 point guy the last few years?

I hope Sather listens to you.

especially if hew gets hurt retires decides to hide in the Montana compound of Tim Thomas hiding cause the Mayan calendar sez the world ends in 5 months they are stuck for the full amount now 2 years with 2 club options still way over the top as money goes and do you think with the CBA proposal that the owners have put up that this won't be used as a We think you're making a lot more money than you are saying you are " point

QUOTE(#14):

Originally posted 02:20 PM ET  07.14 by Nard Dog

So you would take an over 35 contract and pay a guy 7.5 mil a yr no matter what for 4 more years? He was 50 point scorer last year. So even if he stayed even the next few years, that still leaves you paying 7.5 for a 30-40 point guy the last few years? I hope Sather listens to you.

Its all about his character. And i said 3..