Truth & Rumors > NBA

Chandler calls NBA idea 'ridiculous'

Views
5553
Comments
69

08:10 AM ET 08.02 | Kobe Bryant had his say, and now Tyson Chandler has piled on. [Chandler] has a message for NBA owners and executives who are rumbling about their players extending themselves in the summer to play for their countries, and about limiting their stars' involvement in future Olympics: Check the facts. "It's ridiculous," Chandler told Sporting News. "Why would you want to do that? Because like I say, throughout the history, just about every time a player has played for the U.S. team, he comes back and had a better season. That goes around the board." While NBA commissioner David Stern has suggested that Olympic teams roll back their use of NBA players to those 23 and under, members of Team USA have a much different view.

Sporting News

Tyson Chandler, Getty Images Tyson Chandler, Getty Images
August 2, 2012  08:14 AM ET

Do not contradict Czar Stern................He will not like this...................He knows what is best for the NBA.....................





Don't believe me ??????






ASK HIM............

Comment #2 has been removed
Comment #3 has been removed
August 2, 2012  08:47 AM ET
QUOTE(#2):

Its brand marketing, and advertising

Bingo.

August 2, 2012  08:53 AM ET

Chandler is gonna come back and have a better season, a 20-10 season. No he won't :)

August 2, 2012  08:53 AM ET

Just because the US dominates? Let's get rid of women's field hockey, or ping pong, being other countries dominate it.

Comment #7 has been removed
Comment #8 has been removed
August 2, 2012  09:13 AM ET

You Are Paid To Play And Not Think, Bro.

August 2, 2012  09:16 AM ET
QUOTE(#7):

its not just about the US dominating-there are only like 3-4 countries that can dribble and pass above a HS level

And a few NBA teams that can't..........

August 2, 2012  09:16 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

You Are Paid To Play And Not Think, Bro.

I think.............Therefore I am..............

Comment #12 has been removed
August 2, 2012  09:17 AM ET
QUOTE(#3):

If I were an owner, I would not want the franchise guy I am contractually obligated to pay a king's ransom every season, risking injury playing for 2 weeks for free.But on the other side how can anyone fault young athletes at the top of their game for wanting to represent their country at the olympics, and in America how can you prohibit it?I see both sides, and for that reason have no opinion.

It's all about the marketing and merchandising.

August 2, 2012  09:20 AM ET
QUOTE(#2):

The Olympics are supposed to be a competition.When you win by 30, 40, etc.....that's not competition, that's target practiceIts brand marketing, and advertising Basketball will not be an Olympic sport in the next 10 years, so 23 & under is a silly debate anyway

Yeah, I disagree with Olympic basketball disappearing by 2024. Interesting stat they showed during the Olympics was 59 of the total 144 olympic basketball players are in the nba.

The IOC needs to decide if they want to return basketball to it's amature standing, where no professional can play. May not be the ideal solution as players would have to make a choice between $$ and Olympics, but I think this is better than the 23 and under rule.

Comment #15 has been removed
Comment #16 has been removed
Comment #17 has been removed
Comment #18 has been removed
Comment #19 has been removed
 
Comment #20 has been removed

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Howard aired D'Antoni grievances with Lakers
    Views
    31872
    Comments
    1797
  2. 2
    'Alarming' report on Werth
    Views
    18634
    Comments
    652
  3. 3
    Stunned Cavs open to dealing top pick
    Views
    2796
    Comments
    435
  4. 4
    Duquette's luck running out
    Views
    847
    Comments
    256
  5. 5
    Babcock's best job ever?
    Views
    2225
    Comments
    110

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos