Truth & Rumors > MLB

What John Farrell would cost Boston

Views
35036
Comments
259

08:12 AM ET 10.05 | As a desired commodity, the price may be rising on John Farrell. If the Red Sox really want [Farrell] to be their next manager, it's going to cost them. Even though the Blue Jays haven't won in two seasons under Farrell and the past month in Toronto has been filled with controversy, a major league source said today that team president Paul Beeston will demand compensation for allowing Farrell out of the final year of his contract, especially to join an AL East rival. While the source stopped short of saying the Blue Jays would ask for something "significant," it's clear they would want "a decent player," according the source, even if Farrell tells them he would prefer to leave or refuses to discuss a contract extension.

Boston Herald

John Farrell, Icon Sports John Farrell, Icon Sports
October 5, 2012  08:18 AM ET

Lackey and (or) Bard. Straight up.

Comment #2 has been removed
October 5, 2012  08:35 AM ET

The Toronto media has gone a bit crazy over this one...last night, there was the suggestion that the Jays should try to get Pedroia....as much as I'd love to see him in T.O., Boston management isn't that stupid (or desperate).

October 5, 2012  08:35 AM ET

I'm still not sure what the media love affair is with Farrell. I would rather get someone like Dave Martinez or Sandy Alamar Jr. But if the plan is this big youth movement why not promote the manager from Pawtuckett as he already knows these guys and they played well for him.

October 5, 2012  08:39 AM ET
QUOTE(#3):

The Toronto media has gone a bit crazy over this one...last night, there was the suggestion that the Jays should try to get Pedroia....as much as I'd love to see him in T.O., Boston management isn't that stupid (or desperate).

It shows how little the media up there knows about baseball.

October 5, 2012  08:53 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

I'm still not sure what the media love affair is with Farrell. I would rather get someone like Dave Martinez or Sandy Alamar Jr. But if the plan is this big youth movement why not promote the manager from Pawtuckett as he already knows these guys and they played well for him.

Totally agree. What has John Farrell done in his managing career that makes him a desired commodity?

October 5, 2012  09:02 AM ET

I don't want the Sox to give the Blue Jays anything, just get a different manager

October 5, 2012  09:03 AM ET
QUOTE(#3):

Boston management isn't that stupid (or desperate).

Um...this is a team that fired Terry Francona and replaced him with Bobby Valentine. They are that stupid.

Comment #9 has been removed
Comment #10 has been removed
October 5, 2012  09:05 AM ET

If they want Farrell, take him. He's done JS for the Jays. At the very least, it was expected that pitching would be improved under him. Ricky Romero went from a potential ace to a joke. Bullpen is still terrible (blame on that is shared by both JF and AA). He isn't getting anything out of the young guys (Lawrie, Rasmus, Arencibia all took steps backwards this year). This was the worst season in Blue Jays history, even taking into account all the injuries.

October 5, 2012  09:05 AM ET

This is going to be interesting.
After the Theo "compensation" fiasco, let's see if Sox managment learned anything.
Farrell may be worth a lesser rated minor leaguer or two, but nothing of real value.
If they can't strike a deal, then an option is to find a place-holder for a year until Farrell becomes available. Question is, who would take the job under those circumstances for just a year--Variteck?

Comment #13 has been removed
October 5, 2012  09:08 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

If it's going to cost Boston too much, they have to have a runner-up or two. No way Pedroia goes to Toronto in exchange.

Hello Kitty!

October 5, 2012  09:11 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

This is going to be interesting.After the Theo "compensation" fiasco, let's see if Sox managment learned anything.Farrell may be worth a lesser rated minor leaguer or two, but nothing of real value.If they can't strike a deal, then an option is to find a place-holder for a year until Farrell becomes available. Question is, who would take the job under those circumstances for just a year--Variteck?

Nobody takes the Red Sox job for a year. For that they might as well have kept Bobby.

October 5, 2012  09:13 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

He is NOT Bobby Valentine or Terry Francona

Your right, he's never been to , or won a World Series.

October 5, 2012  09:14 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

Totally agree. What has John Farrell done in his managing career that makes him a desired commodity?

Just this yearOmar Visquel made a few comments that this guy can't manage and the players constantly make the same mistakes.

Comment #18 has been removed
Comment #19 has been removed
 
October 5, 2012  09:21 AM ET
QUOTE(#18):

Omar has alzheimer's

Omar contributed eff all towards helping the young guys progress, which is what he was there for this year. I'm assuming Escobar's eye black was aimed at him.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Howard aired D'Antoni grievances with Lakers
    Views
    31773
    Comments
    1797
  2. 2
    'Alarming' report on Werth
    Views
    18583
    Comments
    652
  3. 3
    Stunned Cavs open to dealing top pick
    Views
    2589
    Comments
    421
  4. 4
    Duquette's luck running out
    Views
    807
    Comments
    249
  5. 5
    Babcock's best job ever?
    Views
    2219
    Comments
    110

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos