Brown as committed as ever

That's how he is supposed to think.

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 08:26 AM ET  10.16 by HOGGIE STYLE

That's how he is supposed to think.

Thats how you think when your job is on the line

"Brown was more committed than confused, more determined than downtrodden."

He may be more committed, but he's still confused. He's going to become another JoePa or Bowden.

It takes a very strong man to know when it's his time to move on. You lost Muschamp because you didn't want to leave a couple years ago. Like George Costanza says, "Leave on a high note...".

I'm officially sick and tired of Mack threads. 3 days in a row is over my limit.

UTx can afford payments for his commitment to the state hospital for the mentally insane. I believe the hospital resides in Austin anyway...and there he'll be able to dine and play board games with most of the Texas Legislators.

After they pretty much destroyed the Big 12 with their longhorn network garbage, I cant help but laugh. How many points did Oklahoma hang on them again?

Here's a question for all your FN genius'. How long can UTx churn $$$$$$$$$ while still losing? How long's it been since they won a Big 12 championship in one of the major sports?

Coffers are flowing over but the losses keep piling up.

He is committed in getting paid a lot for so little, keep it up.

This is four threads in three days???? It must be serious lol

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 08:40 AM ET  10.16 by MountainGator

He's going to become another JoePa or Bowden.

I don't know about all this "old guy" stuff: there are plenty of young coaches who lose it over time. RichRod, for example, couldn't do s hite at Michigan with ample resources and the parade of coaches at ND has only just ended [probably] with Kelly.) Mack has just lost it and it's time to go.

He is committed or should be committed? Such a fine line!!!!

QUOTE(#13):

Originally posted 09:37 AM ET  10.16 by Moudz

Committed = right word wrong context

That's what I was getting at.

Awww geez, not this crap again.

QUOTE(#15):

Originally posted 09:46 AM ET  10.16 by Moudz

I think the general belief is they will return 20 of 22 starters or something like that and feel the youth on defense is the problem this year whereas last year it was the youth on offense which was the problem. Maybe next year its special teams.

Not being able to tackle doesn't seem like a youth problem. I saw guys in the right places that just didn't make tackles Saturday.

QUOTE(#15):

Originally posted 09:46 AM ET  10.16 by Moudz

I think the general belief is they will return 20 of 22 starters or something like that and feel the youth on defense is the problem this year whereas last year it was the youth on offense which was the problem. Maybe next year its special teams.

Old Texas HS football coach's team was picked to win the district after having gone 0-10 the two previous seasons. He asked how the other coaches how they could vote that way. The other coaches said, "You've got 21 of 22 starters back that all have two years of experience...that's why." His reply was, "When you've gone 0-20 with those guys, you want some new ones...you don't want them back!"

QUOTE(#17):

Originally posted 09:51 AM ET  10.16 by Joe Kidd #1

Not being able to tackle doesn't seem like a youth problem. I saw guys in the right places that just didn't make tackles Saturday.

Seven on seven training...just touch 'em.