Views: 2366
Comments: 11

05:19 PM ET 01.16 | Though the Eagles would need him to restructure his contract, Michael Vick seems to be the best available quarterback for Chip Kelly -- as of right now. Vick certainly has the mobility that Kelly seems to value in a quarterback, but Vick's inability to stay on the field has certainly has hampered his perceived value. Is Vick the perfect Chip Kelly quarterback? No, not by any means. But Vick provides Kelly a quarterback who is mobile with a strong arm -- qualities that Foles lacks. If Vick stays in Philadelphia next season, he won't be earning all $15.5 million dollars. Still, Eagles fans shouldn't be surprised if Vick is the team's signal caller once again.

NFL.com

Michael Vick, US Presswire

Comments (11) Add A Comment

January 16, 2013 05:27 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

It would be interesting to see Vick play for Kelly but Foles showed he deserves a good look.

Total Comments (3797)

January 16, 2013 05:29 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

He actually could be a good fit but the REAL issue is the O-line more than Vick...if they cant sure up that line then that quick throw system could be very beneficial

DR_Universal

Charlotte , NC

Total Comments (1852)

January 16, 2013 05:34 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 05:27 PM ET 01.16 by |

It would be interesting to see Vick play for Kelly but Foles showed he deserves a good look.

I agree!!! Foles came from Zona in the 12 PAC and he can run the ball, besides, Foles is a much better passer than Vick!!!

The Oldtimer

Total Comments (23124)

January 16, 2013 05:42 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 05:34 PM ET 01.16 by The Oldtimer

I agree!!! Foles came from Zona in the 12 PAC and he can run the ball, besides, Foles is a much better passer than Vick!!!

Huh? didnt you read that Vick has a stronger arm and more mobile? Ole timer!!!

CREEPY FACE !!

Total Comments (22929)

January 16, 2013 05:51 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 05:42 PM ET 01.16 by CREEPY FACE !!

Huh? didnt you read that Vick has a stronger arm and more mobile? Ole timer!!!

LMFAO, where did you hear that Vick had a stronger arm than Foles??? I will agree with you that Vick is more mobile, but Foles can run when needed!!!

The Oldtimer

Total Comments (23124)

January 16, 2013 06:01 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#5):

Originally posted 05:51 PM ET 01.16 by The Oldtimer

LMFAO, where did you hear that Vick had a stronger arm than Foles??? I will agree with you that Vick is more mobile, but Foles can run when needed!!!

Read the artilce again...Ole Man!!! It says Foles lacks a strong arm!!!

CREEPY FACE !!

Total Comments (22929)

January 16, 2013 06:06 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#6):

Originally posted 06:01 PM ET 01.16 by CREEPY FACE !!

Read the artilce again...Ole Man!!! It says Foles lacks a strong arm!!!

And I thought all White people could read....WRONG!!!

CREEPY FACE !!

Total Comments (22929)

January 16, 2013 06:08 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#5):

Originally posted 05:51 PM ET 01.16 by The Oldtimer

LMFAO, where did you hear that Vick had a stronger arm than Foles??? I will agree with you that Vick is more mobile, but Foles can run when needed!!!

I think from observing I can say that Foles might be able to drop back and throw the ball farther, but Vick has much more velocity and rotation on the football once he releases it. So I think it depends on what you're basis of strongest arm entails.