Views: 1423
Comments: 15

01:01 PM ET 02.23 | Nick Foles has been the center of trade discussions between the Philadelphia Eagles and a team with a big need at quarterback, the Kansas City Chiefs, according to USA Today. The Eagles re-signed Michael Vick this offseason, and that has apparently been taken as a signal to the league that Foles is worth talking about with general manager Howie Roseman. USA Today's Mike Garafolo reported that no progress was made toward a deal, and Chiefs coach Andy Reid denied that his team was going to trade for the second-year signal caller from Arizona. Garafolo wrote that Foles is likely not on the market, regardless of the discussion.

Eric Hartline-USA TODAY Sports

Comments (15) Add A Comment

February 23, 2013 01:14 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Is it just me or is this a totally pointless article?

Center Ice

Total Comments (4793)

February 23, 2013 01:21 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 01:14 PM ET 02.23 by Center Ice

Is it just me or is this a totally pointless article?

Totally pointless. Anyone who isn't dead from the neck up knows Vick will get hurt and, given his age, isn't the long term answer for a new regime. Foles showed some promise and can still benefit from a second year of learning. When Vick goes down with an injury, there is a definite chance that Foles takes the job over for keeps.

DarkArmadillo

San Antonio , TX

Total Comments (1201)

February 23, 2013 05:06 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

I'd trade for Foles before I'd trade for Smith if I were the Chiefs...

Otis B. Driftwood

Total Comments (30633)

February 23, 2013 07:35 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 05:06 PM ET 02.23 by Otis B. Driftwood

I'd trade for Foles before I'd trade for Smith if I were the Chiefs...

If I were the Eagles I wouldn't make any trade with the Chiefs that didn't involve swapping 1st round picks plus extra picks.

If that's too much to ask for, then that's fine. There's no reason why the Eagles should consider trading Foles IMO.

(Un)mautre

Inferiority Complex Group, FN

Total Comments (16182)

Comment #5 has been removed

February 23, 2013 07:43 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#5):

Originally posted 07:41 PM ET 02.23 by Just another DJ

Foles is worth that much?

There's no reason why the Eagles should consider trading him.

If you want to trade for a player that shouldn't be on the trade block, you should have to overpay.

(Un)mautre

Inferiority Complex Group, FN

Total Comments (16182)

February 23, 2013 07:44 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Ask for the house... if they don't like it, too bad. He shouldn't be on the trade block.

(Un)mautre

Inferiority Complex Group, FN

Total Comments (16182)

Comment #8 has been removed

February 23, 2013 07:47 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 07:45 PM ET 02.23 by Just another DJ

Who is on the roster at QB? Other than Vick n Foles? I read somewhere they have 4 QBs?

Dixon AND Edwards.

jermur613

Total Comments (1548)

February 23, 2013 07:49 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 07:45 PM ET 02.23 by Just another DJ

Who is on the roster at QB? Other than Vick n Foles? I read somewhere they have 4 QBs?

Google. Get acquainted with it.

TnerB57

Total Comments (27085)

February 23, 2013 07:52 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#10):

Originally posted 07:49 PM ET 02.23 by TnerB57

Google. Get acquainted with it.

Missing stylus.

jermur613

Total Comments (1548)

Comment #12 has been removed

February 23, 2013 07:57 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#12):

Originally posted 07:56 PM ET 02.23 by Just another DJ

That's right. They acquired Dixon. Didnt know they had Trent Edwards. Hopefully, they release him. The Raiders did.

Because the Raiders are deep at QB.