Stars trade Michael Ryder to Habs for Erik Cole

soo yesterday

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 12:45 PM ET  02.27 by NY Rangers

soo yesterday

I don't think I cared then either

I'm more interested that the Flyers got Simon Gagne back.

I believe Bergevin is thinking that this is the answer to Montreal staying atop the Eastern standings but its not 2006 and this team is nothing like that Carolina team and the combo of Whitney and Cole to me in my opinion is not the answer.

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 12:56 PM ET  02.27 by Strauzie

I believe Bergevin is thinking that this is the answer to Montreal staying atop the Eastern standings but its not 2006 and this team is nothing like that Carolina team and the combo of Whitney and Cole to me in my opinion is not the answer.

Not sure what you meant by all that, really.

Wouldn't make staying on top of the Eastern standing a top priority in Bergevin's place. If it happens, great. A good playoff run would please me more.

QUOTE(#5):

Originally posted 01:11 PM ET  02.27 by Stranger

Not sure what you meant by all that, really.

Kind of lost me too?

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 12:45 PM ET  02.27 by NY Rangers

soo yesterday

yup....yawnnnnnn

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 12:56 PM ET  02.27 by Strauzie

I believe Bergevin is thinking that this is the answer to Montreal staying atop the Eastern standings but its not 2006 and this team is nothing like that Carolina team and the combo of Whitney and Cole to me in my opinion is not the answer.

You do know that Whitney and Cole are now in Dallas, right?

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 12:45 PM ET  02.27 by NY Rangers

soo yesterday

SSSOOO right!

QUOTE(#8):

Originally posted 01:49 PM ET  02.27 by dannylimes

You do know that Whitney and Cole are now in Dallas, right?

yes, but I think they were together in Carolina back then (which he is referencing)

QUOTE(#10):

Originally posted 02:22 PM ET  02.27 by NY Rangers

yes, but I think they were together in Carolina back then (which he is referencing)

Yes I was refrencing 2006 Canes and what I was trying to get at with the statement is that I don't feel the trade helped either team so much that it had to be done but I admit I lost myself in my own ramble, need to install a lifeline on my keyboard

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 03:09 PM ET  02.27 by Strauzie

Yes I was refrencing 2006 Canes and what I was trying to get at with the statement is that I don't feel the trade helped either team so much that it had to be done but I admit I lost myself in my own ramble, need to install a lifeline on my keyboard

or a period.

I don't get this trade at all. It is worse than Neal and Niskanen for Goligoski ;-)

QUOTE(#11):

Originally posted 03:09 PM ET  02.27 by Strauzie

Yes I was refrencing 2006

Does that still feel like yesterday to you:)Is that what you were...refrencing

QUOTE(#12):

Originally posted 03:24 PM ET  02.27 by NY Rangers

or a period.

C'mon PC. Periods, commas, semi-colons, exclamation points. The sort of thing lawyers worry about. Stream of consciousness is what we want here. Otherwise I'd spend my time being really p o'd about the Caps. I'm headed for a nap now to dream of Lord Stanley handing me his Cup.

QUOTE(#14):

Originally posted 03:52 PM ET  02.27 by shiprock

Does that still feel like yesterday to you:)Is that what you were...refrencing

Brooks Orpik destoryed Cole that year.

Does this qualify the Stars as 'Old kids on the block' status?

I dont like this trade at all...Ryder in the play-offs possibly against my Bruins ?? Dont like it at all.....

QUOTE(#17):

Originally posted 04:01 PM ET  02.27 by shiprock

Does this qualify the Stars as 'Old kids on the block' status?

They're working on it. I hear they're trying to coax Modano and Zubov out of retirement.

QUOTE(#17):

Originally posted 04:01 PM ET  02.27 by shiprock

Does this qualify the Stars as 'Old kids on the block' status?

Actually - with all the kids, this moves us just a step above puberty - even with Whitney and Jagr.