Trent Richardson gives himself C+ grade for rookie year

Seems about right.

His agent already has a A+++ grade for him when this contract is up.

Maybe even a tad generous, but he was playing for Cleveland.

59 yrds rushing/3 receptions per game...more like D

Norv Turner, hmmm.
Wasn't he the head coach of the Redskins, Raiders & Chargers. How did that work out? Oh, Oh & Oh.

Good luck Browns fans.

He will do well, as the team gets better!

QUOTE(#6):

Originally posted 05:01 PM ET  02.27 by Not4Nutten

He will do well, as the team gets better!

In Cleveland ? yeah right!!! Keep hope alive, right Jesse?

Agreed.

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 01:34 PM ET  02.27 by juan

Maybe even a tad generous, but he was playing for Cleveland.

Also played with a rookie QB.

C+ seems about right...

QUOTE(#12):

Originally posted 08:38 PM ET  02.27 by Mangler.

C+ seems about right...

agree

QUOTE(#4):

Originally posted 02:06 PM ET  02.27 by DR_Universal

59 yrds rushing/3 receptions per game...more like D

Well he did not play all 16 games so your math is irrelevant. Furthermore, it only takes 62.5 yards per game to become a 1,000 rusher which is still the benchmark of a good season which MOST NFL backs do not achieve.

You should call the NFL and declare the new standards of good season to be a minimum of 1,500 yards per season. I'm sure everyone will value your opinon.

QUOTE(#14):

Originally posted 11:18 PM ET  02.27 by bigtmass

You should call the NFL and declare the new standards of good season to be a minimum of 1,500 yards per season. I'm sure everyone will value your opinon.

It's late, be nice..

QUOTE(#14):

Originally posted 11:18 PM ET  02.27 by bigtmass

Well he did not play all 16 games so your math is irrelevant. Furthermore, it only takes 62.5 yards per game to become a 1,000 rusher which is still the benchmark of a good season which MOST NFL backs do not achieve.You should call the NFL and declare the new standards of good season to be a minimum of 1,500 yards per season. I'm sure everyone will value your opinon.

I'd be more concerned with the 3.6 YPC

Although the 1000 yards benchmark has been around since the NFL played only 14 games per season. So it probably should be updated.

And I believe more runningbacks hit the 1000 yard mark than you might think. 16 of the league's starting backs (or half) hit 1000 yards last year; which is around average for the present-day NFL. Actually if you go back to 2006, there were 23 runningbacks who reached the number. It's really not that impressive. It should be considered more of a minimum requirement for keeping your job IMO.

That's the highest grade he's ever gotten, in anything!

QUOTE(#10):

Originally posted 06:34 PM ET  02.27 by Dolemite censored

He's a better OC than HC.

THIS!!!

QUOTE(#16):

Originally posted 06:57 AM ET  02.28 by (Un)

I'd be more concerned with the 3.6 YPCAlthough the 1000 yards benchmark has been around since the NFL played only 14 games per season. So it probably should be updated.And I believe more runningbacks hit the 1000 yard mark than you might think. 16 of the league's starting backs (or half) hit 1000 yards last year; which is around average for the present-day NFL. Actually if you go back to 2006, there were 23 runningbacks who reached the number. It's really not that impressive. It should be considered more of a minimum requirement for keeping your job IMO.

I'd be more concerned with it too had he not played most of the year with broken ribs and a knee that was scoped in August.
Also, Pat's offense didn't focus on T-Rich. So when you see 3rd and short and you have a back that can carry a pile multiple yards being taken off the field, it shows that they didn't use him wisely.

"Trent Richardson gives himself C+ grade for rookie year"

What does he give himself for the pose in that photo? He looks like an idiot. I give him an "F" only because you can't hand out a "Z" to an NFL player (they can't get that far in the alphabet).