Views: 19888
Comments: 10

12:26 PM ET 03.18 | The Kansas City Chiefs have had a whirlwind offseason thus far, and Peter King suggests it might not be over yet. King believes that the team could be listening to offers for left tackle Branden Albert, whom the Chiefs retained with their franchise tag two weeks ago. Should Kansas City feel like a long-term contract isn't going to happen, a trade would make plenty of sense for a team with the No. 1 overall pick and no glaring needs at the moment.

Branden Albert, USA TODAY Sports

Comments (10) Add A Comment

March 18, 2013 12:42 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

"A trade would make plenty of sense for a team with the No. 1 overall pick and no glaring needs at the moment." Did I miss something? Did KC go 16-0 last year? I could have sworn they went 2-14. Or did they change the rules and 2-14 is actually a good thing??

I.M. Hipp

Total Comments (400)

March 18, 2013 12:44 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Oh Wait! We already know they're going to go 16-0 THIS year and THAT'S why they say there's no glaring holes anywhere.

I.M. Hipp

Total Comments (400)

March 18, 2013 01:34 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Sounds like SI is drinking that Alex Smith koolaid.

DarkArmadillo

San Antonio , TX

Total Comments (1199)

March 18, 2013 01:45 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#3):

Originally posted 01:34 PM ET 03.18 by DarkArmadillo

Sounds like SI is drinking that Alex Smith koolaid.

Maybe HCF mailed some to them. He was drinking a lot of it earlier this year in his TDs.

Formerly from Ewa…

Sand Patch, PA

Total Comments (5982)

March 18, 2013 02:11 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

no glaring needs

I'm supposed to take this seriously?

Otis B. Driftwood

Total Comments (30449)

March 18, 2013 02:50 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

QUOTE(#1):

Originally posted 12:42 PM ET 03.18 by I.M. Hipp

"A trade would make plenty of sense for a team with the No. 1 overall pick and no glaring needs at the moment." Did I miss something? Did KC go 16-0 last year? I could have sworn they went 2-14. Or did they change the rules and 2-14 is actually a good thing??

Yea I am a fan of the team and that 'no glaring needs' comment struck me as very odd and silly. We have plenty of holes that need filling and four or five pick ups from free agency didn't eliminate them all.

yungpyro

Total Comments (1237)

March 18, 2013 05:48 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

The Chiefs have a glaring need for wins, and quality offensive linemen are always needed. Especially given that they released Eric Winston, their RT, so they'll need a replacement for RT even if they draft a LT.

I'm sure the Chiefs are listening for trade offers, as they should be. See if someone knocks your socks off. If not, sign Albert and plug him in at one of the tackle spots, depending on who you draft.

bizlaw

Anthem, AZ

Total Comments (43)

March 18, 2013 05:54 PM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

Kanas City might be able to sqeek into the playoffs, Denver is not stronger on defense and Peyton sure looked old against the Ravens in the OT! Who knows I would keep Albert and roll the dice!

Not4Nutten

Total Comments (9815)

March 19, 2013 08:34 AM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

No glaring needs,,, hmmmm,,,O.K let's trade all of Detroit for all of K.C. LMAO,,,,,

MR.ELLCEE

Southfield , MI

Total Comments (1)

March 19, 2013 10:35 AM ET

Report Abuse | QUOTE

The Chiefs should trade OT Branden Albert for the Cowboys SOLB Spencer straight up. Cowboys need a OL and the Chiefs get a SOLB or DE. Both are winners and still keep their draft positions.