Truth & Rumors > NHL

B's, Habs, Canucks like Clowe

Views
3248
Comments
25

08:12 AM ET 03.28 | Because of a full no-trade clause, the Sharks will need Ryane Clowe to sign off on any deadline deal. [Clowe] is exactly what the Habs need, a power forward to complement the skill they have up front. But GM Marc Bergevin isn't terribly keen, I think, about the idea of giving up prime, future assets for a rental player. He knows his team, despite its success this season, isn't in the all-in mentality of Boston and Pittsburgh. ... The Rangers are also interested in Clowe. One more interesting twist here on the Clowe situation: Don't just assume he's 100 percent headed to an Eastern Conference team. I'm told there are Western Conference teams, the Vancouver Canucks among them, that also covet Clowe.

ESPN.com

Ryane Clowe, Getty Images Ryane Clowe, Getty Images
March 28, 2013  08:25 AM ET

But GM Marc Bergevin isn't terribly keen, I think, about the idea of giving up prime, future assets for a rental player.



Just keep on, keepin on...

March 28, 2013  08:35 AM ET

Another piece of journalistic brilliance from the Connecticut Academy of Sports Ignorance

Comment #3 has been removed
March 28, 2013  09:22 AM ET
QUOTE(#2):

Another piece of journalistic brilliance from the Connecticut Academy of Sports Ignorance

Where Yalies go to play!

March 28, 2013  09:33 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

But GM Marc Bergevin isn't terribly keen, I think, about the idea of giving up prime, future assets for a rental player. Just keep on, keepin on...

With Iginla and Morrow in Pittsburgh, Chiarelli might overreact now and ... overpay.

March 28, 2013  09:43 AM ET

B's, Habs, Canucks like Clowe

This will leave the Sharks Cloweless.

March 28, 2013  09:56 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

This will leave the Sharks Cloweless.

No Newfie to row the good ship Sharky.

March 28, 2013  09:56 AM ET
QUOTE(#6):

B's, Habs, Canucks like Clowe. This will leave the Sharks Cloweless.

So ... why is that a problem? It's what we've come to expect from them in post season anyway.

March 28, 2013  10:33 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

But GM Marc Bergevin isn't terribly keen, I think, about the idea of giving up prime, future assets for a rental player. Just keep on, keepin on...

I kinda wouldn't mind if they make a run at him, just to leave the B's empty handed.

March 28, 2013  10:35 AM ET
QUOTE(#8):

So ... why is that a problem? It's what we've come to expect from them in post season anyway.

They handled the Wings in two of the last three post-seasons.

March 28, 2013  10:44 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

They handled the Wings in two of the last three post-seasons.

Yeeeess? And then ........ what?

It's true. We were old and beat up (still are). But, nobody will ever accuse us of being heartless. Win or lose, we'll give you the fight of your life every time, even if we have to stand on one leg to do it.

March 28, 2013  10:46 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

I kinda wouldn't mind if they make a run at him, just to leave the B's empty handed.

Never scored 25 or more goals in a season and has yet to find the twine this year...no thanks.

March 28, 2013  10:56 AM ET
QUOTE(#11):

Yeeeess? And then ........ what?

They lost to the eventual Stanley Cup winning Blackhawks and the following year to a team that went to game seven of the finals.
The playoff chokers label no longer applies.

March 28, 2013  11:00 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

Never scored 25 or more goals in a season and has yet to find the twine this year...no thanks.

Copncur. Never liked him.

So Vancouver suits me.

Or stay where he is.

Either way.

March 28, 2013  11:01 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

With Iginla and Morrow in Pittsburgh, Chiarelli might overreact now and ... overpay.

I was thinking the same thing.....

March 28, 2013  11:01 AM ET
QUOTE(#13):

The playoff chokers label no longer applies.

Sure it does.

March 28, 2013  11:08 AM ET
QUOTE(#16):

Sure it does.

Then I guess the Wings can be seen as chokers unless they play the Coyotes in the playoffs...

March 28, 2013  11:15 AM ET
QUOTE(#17):

Then I guess the Wings can be seen as chokers unless they play the Coyotes in the playoffs...

Nope.

March 28, 2013  11:33 AM ET
QUOTE(#18):

Nope.

In head to head playoff matchups the Sharks hold a 3-2 advantage over the Wings...not bad for a bunch of choke artists.

 
Comment #20 has been removed

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Irving: Fans don't deserve the Cavs
    Views
    6322
    Comments
    680
  2. 2
    Red Sox dodged two injury scares
    Views
    2900
    Comments
    495
  3. 3
    Trump taking a legit run at the Bills
    Views
    2160
    Comments
    106
  4. 4
    Why the Raiders have lost 111 of 160 games
    Views
    5078
    Comments
    66
  5. 5
    Bruins can't count on shut-down D
    Views
    1385
    Comments
    59

SI.com

SI Photos