Truth & Rumors > NBA

Much of KG's game now illegal

Views
17397
Comments
41

07:19 AM ET 10.15 | Through each of his preseason games with the Nets, Kevin Garnett has been whistled for a screen violation. [Garnett] calls himself the "best pick-setter in the league," and it's tough to argue against a player who doesn't give an inch while setting screens. The problem is that the NBA defines much of what Garnett does as illegal, considering his penchant for moving his body into the opponent after setting his feet. The league is using him as a poster-child in its pledge to crack down on such offenses. Garnett, 37, was the first example of a moving screen in the league's annual "points of emphasis" video for referees. Last season, the league pledged to emphasize flopping and undercutting jump shooters. This season, illegal picks are a focus. Garnett understands he'll have to adjust.

New York Daily News

Kevin Garnett, Icon Sports Kevin Garnett, Icon Sports
October 15, 2013  07:41 AM ET

Can he adjust?

Comment #2 has been removed
Comment #3 has been removed
October 15, 2013  08:29 AM ET

where were these rules when he won a championship im guessing they would not of won it

Comment #5 has been removed
October 15, 2013  08:39 AM ET

He was getting called for moving picks in the past. He'll adjust and this is no big deal. It was illegal back then and it's illegal now. It's just the stupid officials were just making too many exceptions back then. Just call the game fairyland equally. No star treatment...

October 15, 2013  08:59 AM ET

Stupid dumb article. The title "Much of KG's game now illegal" could also be "Much of Karl Malone's game now illegal" or "Much of Kareem's game now illegal" and so on and on.

Comment #8 has been removed
October 15, 2013  09:12 AM ET

It's No Longer A Gangsta's Paradise, Bro.

October 15, 2013  10:05 AM ET

About time the league caught up with this fool's antics.........

Almost every single screen he sets is illegal. Not the physicality of it but the moving part of it

Not a fan of KG though, so there is that.....

Comment #11 has been removed
October 15, 2013  10:28 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

It's No Longer A Gangsta's Paradise, Bro.

Nice.

Comment #13 has been removed
Comment #14 has been removed
Comment #15 has been removed
October 15, 2013  10:54 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

I hate taking the physicality out of the game

I hate when obvious fouls are not called.

And Garnett's moving screens have always been fouls. They were just never called.

October 15, 2013  10:55 AM ET
QUOTE(#14):

That's old school stuff. Who wants to see a team advance because they hurt an opposing star?

What if somebody catches a player of LBJ's stature and knocks him out for a few games and the Heat lose. Do we want this?

Picks are legal. You just aren't allowed to move into guys. This seems reasonable.

Agreed with all points!

October 15, 2013  10:56 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

About time the league caught up with this fool's antics.........

Almost every single screen he sets is illegal. Not the physicality of it but the moving part of it

Not a fan of KG though, so there is that.....

Doesn't matter that you're not a fan. You still happen to be right!

October 15, 2013  11:15 AM ET

Lookee here....one of the best defensive centers in the modern era, Alonzo Mourning, used to get hit with those moving picks everytime he set one. He'd never complain, just turn around, shake his head, and then trudge back down the court. They got him just about every time. Why should Garnett get a free pass to bust someone up with those illegal picks?

 
October 15, 2013  11:38 AM ET

This too shall pass. Last year the refs were going to stop "flopping." Have you ever seen it called?

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Irving: Fans don't deserve the Cavs
    Views
    7046
    Comments
    680
  2. 2
    Red Sox dodged two injury scares
    Views
    2924
    Comments
    495
  3. 3
    Trump taking a legit run at the Bills
    Views
    2191
    Comments
    106
  4. 4
    Why the Raiders have lost 111 of 160 games
    Views
    5492
    Comments
    66
  5. 5
    Bruins can't count on shut-down D
    Views
    1475
    Comments
    59

SI.com

SI Photos