Truth & Rumors > NCAAB

Pac-10 exec critical of Bruins call

Views
448
Comments
0

Bill McCabe, the Pacific 10 supervisor of officials, criticized the call made by official Kevin Brill at the end of regulation in UCLA's 77-67 overtime victory over Stanford at Pauley Pavilion on Thursday night. ith UCLA trailing, 63-61, Stanford's Lawrence Hill was called for a foul on the driving Darren Collison with 2.5 seconds left in regulation. Hill blocked Collison's shot and replays appeared to show that while the block was clean, Hill had made body contact with his hips. Collison made both free throws to send the game into overtime. McCabe told ESPN, "There was body contact, but it's not a strong call, not a game-appropriate call. It's not an incorrect call and that doesn't make it wrong. But I want solid calls."

Los Angeles Times

Darren Collison, AP Darren Collison, AP
March 8, 2008  01:34 PM ET

So he's saying the call was correct, but he just didn't like it.

Nice.....I like how he comes out of no where to criticize the PAC-10 refs when the Bruins win something....but we haven't heard squat from this guy all season when refs have been blowing REALLY obvious calls and changing the outcome of other important games.

FIX THE OFFICIATING!

March 8, 2008  01:51 PM ET

I have not seen many Pac-10 games this year so I can not talk about the officiating for the whole season but if a foul is a fouls in the middle of the first half it is a foul with 2.5 seconds remaining in the game.

As a coach, player, and former ref, who still attends many basketball games over the past few months, in general people tend to blame refs at every level of basketball including pre-high school games to college games. 99% of the time I defend the refs since unless you have done the job, you have no idea how tough of a job it is to perform. But Mr, McCabe, who is probably a former ref, is wrong to publicly question a fellow ref on any call, right or wrong. Have the behind the scenes review to see who is better than others but you do not say it publicly.

March 8, 2008  02:29 PM ET

I was watching this game... And when the call was made I cringed... Because the block looked clean... But as soon as the official blew the whistle... He made the motion that the foul was with body... And replays show... He was absolutely right... Mr. McCabe should have kept his mouth shut on this one

March 8, 2008  03:35 PM ET

You do not call that foul when you're the trailing ref. It was a bad/wrong/stupid call. What makes refs above everybody else that they can't be criticized? He was wrong. Point blank. He got called out for it and he should have.

March 8, 2008  04:19 PM ET

Way to stand behind your guys, Bill. What a great boss. Should the military investigate this as a friendly-fire incident?

March 8, 2008  08:28 PM ET

Ryan Anderson was fouled in the Cal-ucla game with 1.5 seconds left. The foul was not called and the bears would have won the Game

March 8, 2008  08:45 PM ET

UCLA must be loving the refs two straight games an refs pull them out!!

March 9, 2008  01:58 AM ET

WarriorsCal, you're just saying that because you lost, if the situation were reversed, you'd say differently, so stop your b itching. Either way, the Bruins still won more Pac-10 games (16) than any other team. If you take away these last two wins, they would still be tied for wins in the Pac-10, so get over yourselves.

March 9, 2008  04:24 AM ET

first of all the shot ucla put up at the end of the game against the cal bears was not a legal shot. he shot that from behind the backboard, up and over, no one mention that. the referee choked

March 9, 2008  08:41 AM ET

The answer is simple: Start paying refs more so they won't have to accept bribes. The call in the Stanford game was bad, but the calls in the Cal game on Sat can ONLY have 1 conclusion -- the game was fixed...UCLA was going to win that game; regardless. So, UCLA can (literally) tackle the Cal player in the last 25 seconds ...no foul. So, UCLA's game-winning shot goes OVER the backboard, no violation is called. UCLA players were even *laughing* about the latter after the game. This was more than just a blown call from the widely-recognized incompetence of Pac-10 officiating..this could ONLY be incompetence-for-money.

March 9, 2008  08:42 AM ET

The answer is simple: Start paying refs more so they won't have to accept bribes. The call in the Stanford game was bad, but the calls in the Cal game on Sat can ONLY have 1 conclusion -- the game was fixed...UCLA was going to win that game; regardless. So, UCLA can (literally) tackle the Cal player in the last 25 seconds ...no foul. So, UCLA's game-winning shot goes OVER the backboard, no violation is called. UCLA players were even *laughing* about the latter after the game. This was more than just a blown call from the widely-recognized incompetence of Pac-10 officiating..this could ONLY be incompetence-for-money.

March 9, 2008  12:57 PM ET

First let me clarify this... I am NOT a ucla fan... But geeeeeeezus... Anderson... Who is one of the best players in the Pac-10... Not to mention one of the toughest... Took a dive.. There was some contact with Westbrook's arm across his back... But no friggin way was he "tackled"... No way

March 9, 2008  03:08 PM ET

igor, you're an idiot, and the jealousy in your comment is entirely transparent, so just ****.

March 10, 2008  12:05 PM ET

This Pac-10 official should be MORE concerned that his conference's team will ONCE AGAIN have their asses handed to them in the post season.

 
March 10, 2008  08:31 PM ET

"The answer is simple: Start paying refs more so they won't have to accept bribes. The call in the Stanford game was bad, but the calls in the Cal game on Sat can ONLY have 1 conclusion -- the game was fixed...UCLA was going to win that game; regardless. So, UCLA can (literally) tackle the Cal player in the last 25 seconds ...no foul. So, UCLA's game-winning shot goes OVER the backboard, no violation is called. UCLA players were even *laughing* about the latter after the game. This was more than just a blown call from the widely-recognized incompetence of Pac-10 officiating..this could ONLY be incompetence-for-money" -Igor

Obviously you don't realize that PAC-10 officials, both in basketball and football, are incompetent pro bono.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Sources: Big Ben having second thoughts
    Views
    7138
    Comments
    1009
  2. 2
    Report: Halladay would welcome Yankees trade
    Views
    27268
    Comments
    475
  3. 3
    Have Irish already offered Kelly job?
    Views
    35527
    Comments
    75
  4. 4
    Stoops to take Notre Dame job?
    Views
    3903
    Comments
    59
  5. 5
    Report: Tiger's injuries inflicted by wife
    Views
    1568
    Comments
    58

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - Now it's all football
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Is Bob Stoops being paid under…
    Views
    161
    Replies
    13
  2. NFL > General NFL

    COLTS & SAINTS ~ Is This The…
    Views
    106
    Replies
    59
  3. NFL > General NFL

    Tiger Woods???? Wife smashes…
    Views
    90
    Replies
    27

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos