Rams feel Bruce's absence
Posted: Saturday March 29, 2008 09:11AM ET
It's not as if Isaac Bruce was a regular participant during the Rams' offseason conditioning program. He always preferred to do most of his offseason work on his own, usually away from St. Louis. Cut by the team at the end of February, and quickly picked up by San Francisco, Bruce no longer has a locker stall at Rams Park. His absence this week did not go unnoticed by Rams veterans.
Isaac Bruce , Chris Graythen/Getty Images
Comments (8)
The times they are a changin'
sacked92 | 03/29/08, 09:28 AM
Report Offensive CommentHis absence this whole year will not go unnoticed by Rams veterans.
From here on out he will always prefer to do most of his offseason work on his own, definitely away from St. Louis.
49er SF Giants | 03/29/08, 09:32 AM
Report Offensive CommentI hated when they let him go. He desrved better than that having played for the team as long as he had and he had a pretty good season last year.
c note | 03/29/08, 09:55 AM
Report Offensive CommentNot paying him was simply stupid.
Shepiam | 03/29/08, 11:35 AM
Report Offensive CommentFrom the Rams to the 49ers. That is a bad year. A lose lose situation.
50yearfan | 03/29/08, 07:30 PM
Report Offensive Commentmistake by the rams they need his leadership and his cathcing to even the load for holt
trojan904 | 03/29/08, 09:48 PM
Report Offensive CommentI feel his absence and I don't even like the Rams!
Cowboys4Lyfe | 03/29/08, 10:26 PM
Report Offensive CommentWell, if the Rams go 3-13 again, then I'd say that Bruce's presence was missed. But if the team improves significantly, then that's the business of football. Bruce wasn't the first franchise superstar to get cast aside late in his career. Remember Emmitt Smith as a Cardinal? Or Jerry Rice with the Raiders, Broncos, and Seahawks?
M-a-r-s | 04/01/08, 12:33 PM
Report Offensive CommentAdd a comment
Remember to keep it clean. Bad words will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed. More Guidelines