Truth & Rumors > NCAAF

Promo_BaseballChallenge_638x30

Army letting cadets go pro

Views
489
Comments
0

A recently implemented rule at the U.S. Military Academy could change the way cadets are selected in April's NFL draft. Army is offering its top athletes a side door to professional sports. West Point has implemented an alternative service option program that allows cadets to turn pro -- and play -- right away. Cadets accepted into the program "will owe two years of active service in the Army, during which time they will be allowed to play their sport in the player-development systems of their respective organizations and be assigned to recruiting stations. If they remain in professional sports following those two years, they will be provided the option of buying out the remaining three years of their active-duty commitment in exchange for six years of reserve time.

Dallas Morning News

Army football, Jim McIsaac/Getty Images Army football, Jim McIsaac/Getty Images
March 30, 2008  11:19 AM ET

Don't know what to make of this one? You go to West Point to be a Top notch Army Officer. I just wonder what every other current Army Officer (Especially my son-in-law) who is now in a combat zone or are on multiple tours in country is thinking when they read this? If you want to go to the Pro's, play at the other Colleges, not at West Point. The country has spent a tremendous amount of money training these young men to be the future leaders of the Army. When you decide and get accepted at the "Point", you should already know the obligation of Military service for your education, if not, you need not be there. Playing Football does not do any of troops in the Field, in Combat any good, period. This is just an opinion of a proud ex-Army Paratrooper. Airborne-All the way!

March 30, 2008  11:30 AM ET

West Point is supposed to be about producing highly education and effective military leaders, not a farm system for the NFL, NBA, MLf -- this is outrageous and an affront to all US taxpayers ... if Congress wants to get involved in regulating professional sports, here is the perfect case ... I suppose Democrats are saying, get our troops out of the Middle East and into the NFL!

March 30, 2008  07:41 PM ET

This is a really really bad polically correct idea.Not much more to say than that.

March 31, 2008  08:03 AM ET

Embarrassing

March 31, 2008  10:31 AM ET

I guess they figure it could improve overall recruiting to the Army because these players would have to serve at recruiting stations. So its a trade-off of losing this man as a leader in exchange for getting a lot more privates enlisted.

April 1, 2008  03:08 PM ET

SWEET - I graduate from West Point get to go pro and then only have to look forward to 6!! years of reserve duty. LMAO - what a deal!

April 8, 2008  06:46 PM ET

I have no idea what all of this means, but it doesn't sound like the type of deal that will attract top talent that is on the fence, afraid to loose their chance at pro careers.

How about this for option B - they immediately go into active reserve, spending x months a year assigned to a recruiting station during their sports off season. After their pro career or at age 39 (whichever comes 1st) they enter the military full time and complete their full 5 year commitment plus 1 additional year as a recruiter.

 
April 14, 2008  12:56 AM ET

Some of you guys need to see the bigger picture. As an academy grad, I have no problem whatsoever with this policy. In fact, I embrace it. Think about the causal mechnisms in play here: allowing the kids to go pro will probably bring in better recruits. Better recruits will help to resurrect a defunct and embarrassing football program (a losing mentality is contagious and not good for officers - from the Supe). A better football program will bring in better publicity and thus better cadets, not to mention more money for other sports (and hence, officer development). Don't worry - this policy ISN'T going to taint the academy experience nor the officer ranks. What will taint the officer corps is a losing mentality born on the "fields of friendly strife."

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Browns owner chasing Holmgren?
    Views
    19229
    Comments
    1614
  2. 2
    Who will play shortstop for Red Sox?
    Views
    20991
    Comments
    1306
  3. 3
    Ex-Eagle: Cowboys everything wrong about NFL
    Views
    69848
    Comments
    1029
  4. 4
    Navy loss a deal-breaker for Weis?
    Views
    41565
    Comments
    323
  5. 5
    Patriots show up Porter
    Views
    19696
    Comments
    265

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Porkins: F U to Hell, BCS
  2. 2
    RobertMenn: You stole my rake
  3. 3
    Perfectpats
  4. 4
    sign here
  5. 5
    Oso: Informative Sports. com

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Iowa's loss was good for the…
    Views
    644
    Replies
    82
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    BCS Standings - Updated:…
    Views
    439
    Replies
    36
  3. NFL > Chicago Bears

    Week 9...The Arizona…
    Views
    248
    Replies
    53

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos