Truth & Rumors > Soccer

Ferguson to coach British nat'l team?

Views
107
Comments
0

Lord Sebastian Coe has said he has spoken to Sir Alex Ferguson about him taking charge of a Great Britain football team at the London Olympics. Coe, London 2012 Organizing Committee chairman, said he had discussed the matter with the Manchester United boss. The inclusion of a Great Britain football team at the London Games has sparked a lot of controversy with the FAs of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland concerned it may compromise their individual status within FIFA. President of football's world governing body, Sepp Blatter, has said it would be better for Britain to enter a team featuring players from just England to avoid such a scenario.

BBC Sport

Alex Ferguson, Manchester United via Getty Images Alex Ferguson, Manchester United via Getty Images
July 22, 2008  10:56 AM ET

YAAAAAWWNNN!! Zzzzzzzzz! Zzzzzzzz!

July 22, 2008  11:46 AM ET

It's possible. Sir Alex did say he wanted to retire from Manchester United in three seasons. However, I have a hard time believing this one. Yes, the Olympics will be in London but I am not sure if the English Under 23 team is good enough for him to actually win as manager of the Olympic squad.

July 22, 2008  05:00 PM ET

like ive never heard this before. this rumor is old, but its probably true

July 23, 2008  06:38 AM ET

J Hova: it will never happen because FIFA will be forced to re-examine the foolishness of having 4 separate FA's in one country. Its essentially like having every state in the US have it's own FA and league. Every state has their own capital and own government and a degree of sovereignty but just like the UK they are all ultimately ruled by once city.
Also, the fact that 3 of those FA's have 3 of the 6 votes on the rules board further taints that desire to remain separate.
Also it wouldn't be an English U-23 team it would be a heretofore unheard of United Kingdome U-23 team. (i.e. Scots, Welsh, English and N. Ireland players on one team)

July 23, 2008  08:32 AM ET

As stated many times in the past, an all British team would merely be the English national team with Shay Given in goal and Ryan Giggs out on the left.

July 23, 2008  08:55 AM ET

sitho-- I know a lot of Irish, Welsh and Scots who would have your head and drag your bloody body through the streets for saying they are individual countries--so be careful where you say that. Technically, though they are a "union" of sorts, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland are actually different countries.

July 23, 2008  08:56 AM ET

ps. Ooops. Fix that...I meant for saying they ARE NOT individual countries...

July 23, 2008  11:14 AM ET

That would be great! Then, and only then, will the world know how limited Alex Ferguson really is as a manager!

July 23, 2008  02:11 PM ET

sitho-- Just because what I wrote is confusing, here is what I meant to say:

I know a lot of Irish, Welsh and Scots who would have your head and drag your bloody body through the streets for saying they are NOT individual countries--so be careful where you say that. Technically, though they are a "union" of sorts, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland are actually different countries.

 
July 23, 2008  02:48 PM ET

Yep, it is more like saying that the US, Puerto Rico and Guam should for a single national team. Puerto Rico may be a US territory, but it is also a sovereign nation, and has it's own national football team.

Scotland in particular has its own Parliament, creates its own laws (many of which are very different to those in the rest of Britain) and has its own currency. Even Wales and N.Ireland have their own legislative bodies, and many of their elected members would welcome a complete separation from the UK itself.

As the previous poster says, I would be extremely careful saying some of those things in Wales, N.Ireland or Scotland. You would probably be beaten to a pulp, dragged through the streets and hung on the outskirts as a warning to everyone of like mind.

As for a GB team, I doubt it'll ever happen. For much the same reason as the beating and dragging through the street, the Scots, Welsh and N. Irish would never accept it. They know that at best they'd have a fringe involvement in such a team, and very few first team players. The idea that this could very well lead to the abolition of their national teams in events of actual importance is not something they'd take lying down.

After all while the Olympics to a nation like Britain is a fine thing, it's not even close to being regarded on the same level as the football or rugby international competitions. It's just a cultural thing.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Bills owner wanted Gruden
    Views
    60624
    Comments
    387
  2. 2
    Why Knicks passed on Iverson
    Views
    28604
    Comments
    106
  3. 3
    Raiders players happy with new QB
    Views
    11647
    Comments
    91
  4. 4
    Yankees keeping eye on Halladay
    Views
    48464
    Comments
    89
  5. 5
    Trouble beneath surface for MLS?
    Views
    2597
    Comments
    56

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    2009's most disappointing team
    Views
    548
    Replies
    25
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    CFB Game Day 11/21/2009
    Views
    317
    Replies
    143
  3. NCAAF > LSU Tigers

    Les Miles FIRE HIM
    Views
    139
    Replies
    18

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos