Truth & Rumors > MLB

Promo_BaseballChallenge_638x30

Mets checking out relievers

Views
268
Comments
0

The Mets don't have the Yankees' need for a lefty reliever, but many of the names coming up from their end are left-handers. They checked in on Seattle's Arthur Rhodes, but the sense Wednesday was that he was bound for the Marlins. They have continued to keep tabs on Pittsburgh's in-demand Damaso Marte, and the scout they had at Monday night's Rangers-White Sox game was there (at least in part) to look at Rangers reliever Eddie Guardado.

Newark Star-Ledger

Eddie Guardado, AP Eddie Guardado, AP

Comments (12) Add A Comment

Comment has been removed
July 24, 2008  09:02 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I wish these teams would deal these lefty relievers already. Enough speculation. More action.

July 24, 2008  09:23 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Or you could you just exchange "METS" for "EVERY CONTENDING TEAM" on the subject line

July 24, 2008  10:20 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

man, that pic looks a little like Jesse Orosco.

July 24, 2008  10:36 AM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Arthur Rhodes is still in the league?

July 24, 2008  01:12 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

everyday eddie gets by on mediocre stuff and a whole lot of heart. and that was 10 yrs ago. as a twins fan i love the guy, consumate team player. if he has anything in the tank i'd say he could help a contender.

July 24, 2008  01:15 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I never hear what exactly the Mets have to trade for anybody they seem to want. The Rangers would give them Guardado, but we want Carlos Beltran in return. Cough him up.

Comment has been removed
July 24, 2008  02:34 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

What's with the picture?? It looks like someone just told Eddie that there's no Santa Claus!

July 24, 2008  03:19 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Marte is the way to go if your looking for a reliever.

July 24, 2008  04:08 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

I never hear what exactly the Mets have to trade for anybody they seem to want. The Rangers would give them Guardado, but we want Carlos Beltran in return. Cough him up.

madhatter | 07/24/08, 01:15 PM

I seriouslt hope you don't think the Mets would ever trade Beltran for him. Maybe Nick Evans (an MLB-ready OF), but thats about it. I could also see then giving up some of the relieves in the farm too. But theres no way they would give up a guy like Beltran for a reliever.

 
July 24, 2008  04:22 PM ET
Report Abuse | QUOTE

Agreed. Go after Marte. Street and Fuentes will cost far too much, especially Street. Billy Beane almost always gets the better end of the deal.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Ex-Eagle: Cowboys everything wrong about NFL
    Views
    42908
    Comments
    725
  2. 2
    Mangini scaring off GM candidates?
    Views
    18644
    Comments
    160
  3. 3
    Notre Dame commitment may enroll early
    Views
    6029
    Comments
    104
  4. 4
    Friend: Cavs should fear LeBron leaving
    Views
    6751
    Comments
    82
  5. 5
    What's wrong with Sosa's face?
    Views
    75196
    Comments
    79

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Porkins: F U to Hell, BCS
  2. 2
    RobertMenn: You stole my rake
  3. 3
    Perfectpats
  4. 4
    sign here
  5. 5
    Oso: Yankees win again?

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    CFB Game Day 11/7/2009
    Views
    424
    Replies
    122

  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Sports Illustrated says Pac 10…
    Views
    364
    Replies
    73

  3. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Iowa's loss was good for the…
    Views
    343
    Replies
    67

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

Esti GinzbergEsti Ginzberg
Ariel MeredithAriel Meredith

SI Photos

Strikeforce: Fedor vs. RogersStrikeforce: Fedor vs. Rogers
College Football Top 25 ReviewCollege Football Top 25 Review