Truth & Rumors > NHL

Leafs failed to impress Bowman

Views
434
Comments
0

While the Blackhawks seemingly can do no wrong in the Rocky Wirtz era, Scotty Bowman's willingness to go to Chicago is another glaring example of the ineptitude of the Maple Leafs. Rumors that Bowman wanted to run every facet of the organization ring pretty hollow when you consider that the 74-year-old was hardly an everyday face in the Red Wings' offices. It's safe to read his refusal to join the Leafs as a negative assessment of the team's operation. Bowman, like all great leaders, likes to surround himself with people who are just as committed to greatness. That type is scarce -- maybe even extinct -- in the current Maple Leafs Sports & Entertainment hierarchy.

SI.com

Scotty Bowman, Bruce Bennett/Getty Images Scotty Bowman, Bruce Bennett/Getty Images
August 2, 2008  09:04 AM ET

MLSE sucks. In all of pro sports, the Leafs might have the worst organization of them all, with stiff competition from the Islanders.

August 2, 2008  09:41 AM ET

Wow. So true! The Maple Leafs are not committed to winning or greatness. For the last ten years this organization has made extremely poor choices. The only thing saving this organization is their delusional fans who continue to purchase tickets despite the fact that the Leaf's office is not willing to invest in creating a cup contending team. Bowman made a wise choice!!!!

August 2, 2008  10:18 AM ET

When Scotty was in Detroit of late,look who he had around him: Kenny Holland,Jim Nill,Jimmy Develano,Steve Yzerman.Factor them plus an owner who is committed to the city,the fans...the result is they are Stanley Cup champs.They strive to put a winning product on the ice.The Leaf organization is run by a bunch of bean counters and lack true hockey people to run the ship right.The Leafs have that reputation of doing things half-**** and expecting positive results...instead,their moves eventually blow up in their face.If the Leafs pass up a guy like Scotty with all his credentials,not allow him carte blanche to run the hockey operation,then you know this organization is not focused on winning and will always come up short year after agonizing year.

August 2, 2008  10:38 AM ET

Gee, that's surprising.

August 2, 2008  11:02 AM ET

This article is so poorly reported and inaccurate its ridiculous.
First, it was the Leafs that said no to Bowman.
Second, the situation in Chicago is entirely different from the job he was looking at in Toronto.
Third, Chicago had an inside track with Bowman's family.
That's it.
As far as the Leafs are concerned...they look to be putting the past behind them and it will certainly take some time.
Bowman would not have been the right man to do that in Toronto at age 74.

August 2, 2008  11:30 AM ET

This article is so poorly reported and inaccurate its ridiculous.
Baun-ded

Fair and accurate reporting? What a quaint, old fashioned notion, Baun-ded!
No, no. Forget honesty, research and unbiased opinions. A good dose of sensationalism is the answer - and, whatever you do, don't let the truth interfere with a good story ......

August 2, 2008  12:00 PM ET

It's not that hard to see why he was not impressed! That place is a zoo!

August 2, 2008  12:18 PM ET

The answer is very simple in Leaf Nation. Peddie MUST go. Its a must for the entire organization. He was the one that said "no" to Bowman. Why did he say no? Cause Bowman wanted FULL power over the Leafs and he didnt want to be interfered with,BUT NO. Peddie couldnt relenquish that power. People would take the Leafs more serious if Peddie is gone. Thats a fact.

August 2, 2008  12:48 PM ET

Bgm....Lucic is **** compared to Neely. Re an earlier comment I read from you somewhere...and you would take Neely over Thornton?
How about Rick Middleton?

August 2, 2008  01:09 PM ET

Hhahahahha. Baun-ded,Lucic just started his career man. Will he ever pot 50 goals? I dont think so. He'll be a very solid 30-40 guy though that brings all the intangibles.

August 2, 2008  01:15 PM ET

The leafs are not committed to winning because that would cost money. It is a business plain and simple. It the teachers pension fund that pays for the team. The leafs are an investment to them. They want a large return on their investment.

August 2, 2008  01:27 PM ET

Baund-ed,

Thanks for at least trying to remember what actually happened! So many Leaf-haters out here.. facts get distorted all the time. As I remember it, Bowman wanted full control of hockey operations, and the Leafs refused (for whatever the reason, right or wrong) . Then, Bowman aired his sour grapes on national TV to Ron Mclean, stating he though the job was his, and got meddled out of it by Mr. Peddie and Co. Boo-hoo.

The fact is this, Bowman wanted more responsibility, and was going to take it from anyone. The many-headed management team in Detroit kept Uncle Scotty's hands off all important matters, and when the Hawks came calling, he finally landed a job that satisfied his ego.

Bowman = legendary coach. Mediocre GM credentials at best.

August 2, 2008  01:39 PM ET

As far as the Leafs are concerned...they look to be putting the past behind them and it will certainly take some time.
Bowman would not have been the right man to do that in Toronto at age 74.
Baun-ded | 08/02/08, 11:02 AM

One thing is for certain. For the past number of years, T.O. had been overpaying vets, signing bad deals/clauses, over-promising fans, and building false-expections - in a misguided attempt to win it all now.
Finally, this season, they seem to have a plan and an honest approach with the fans.
They are trying to clean house of some past contracts and mistakes.
They are admitting that they need to retool and that they are taking a multi-year rebuilding approach back to Cup contention.
Those are some very positive changes...at least so far. Will they stick to this plan? If they do, they can become a contender again (not this year, of course but in a few years) But the jury's still out.

August 2, 2008  01:42 PM ET

Bowman = legendary coach. Mediocre GM credentials at best.
joec | 08/02/08, 01:27 PM

Not to doubt his strong coaching abilities, but he also no doubt found himself at the right place in the right time on some of the powerhouse talented teams he coached. Detroit...Pittsburgh/Lemieux. He's the Phil Jackson of the NHL. (Everyone says: hell anyone could coach MJ/Pippen or Kobe/Shaq to championships). They forget that it also takes a good coach to know how to manage superstars.

August 2, 2008  02:14 PM ET

Yes,the Leafs are learning. With the signing of one Jeff Finger to a 14 million dollar contract over 4 seasons They are now the odds on favorite to win the Cup.

August 2, 2008  02:44 PM ET

Yep,the Leafs got the Finger.Richard Peddie is definitely what's wrong with the Leafs organization...as long as he is there,not much will change...the club will be hard-pressed to win enough games to get into the playoffs.

August 2, 2008  03:53 PM ET

They may still have spendicitis. But the point I'm making is that the Leafs aren't promising to even make the playoffs or do anything special for the next 2 years. At least on one hand, they are getting a reality check and admitting they are entering a rebuild phase. They usually think they can just sign and overpay some schmuck and that he is that last missing link to put them in Cup contention that year.

August 2, 2008  05:46 PM ET

The Leafs must be intending to trade one of their under-acheiving d-men. Probably thats why Finger was signed. They want to get rid of McCabe but the guy wants to stay where he's not wanted. The dooche bag. Doesnt he get it? He's not wanted there!!!

McCabe to the Jackets!!! For a broken stick to be names later.

August 2, 2008  06:05 PM ET

The team is trying, no doubt. That's all they will ever do is try. They want to make the play-offs because it PAYS. To attempt the next step and be a contender would cost too much. Its not just the players that cost money (that has a fixed maximum) but the real front office help.
The teachers pension fund (who own the leafs) is as evil as the midget (Bettman). Until someone offers enough money to purchase the leafs, what you see is what you get.

 
August 2, 2008  07:17 PM ET

It's so easy to pile on, but this article speaks for itself. To all of you Leaf fans who say Bowman's too old, it sounds like sour grapes. How old is Cliff Fletcher? Toronto made it impossible for Bowman to say yes, so they could say, "hey, he rejected us." It's typical of the spinning MLSE does to cover their incompetence.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Dr. Andrews: Favre wants to be a Viking
    Views
    6210
    Comments
    1135
  2. 2
    Cutler puts off endorsements
    Views
    23993
    Comments
    202
  3. 3
    Lakers interested in Knick
    Views
    66917
    Comments
    85
  4. 4
    Will Bradley make U.S. team moves?
    Views
    4766
    Comments
    75
  5. 5
    Red Sox trade hinges on Lowell
    Views
    15084
    Comments
    61

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Porkins: NOT BILLY MAYES!!
  2. 2
    RobertMenn: Alves Rd3 TKO
  3. 3
    Perfectpats
  4. 4
    Sassafras
  5. 5
    Oso New Jack City

Message Boards

  1. NFL > Tennessee Titans

    Steve "The Air" McNair
    Views
    412
    Replies
    14
  2. NFL > Chicago Bears

    genaral
    Views
    121
    Replies
    8
  3. NCAAF > Kentucky Wildcats

    Football: What will the Cats…
    Views
    83
    Replies
    4

Blogs