Truth & Rumors > NCAAF

Students question Rutgers football costs

Views
8339
Comments
8

The mood is sour at Rutgers these days, and it is not just because the football team is 1-5 this season. Reports about lax and sometimes secretive spending in the athletic department, published in The Star-Ledger of Newark and other New Jersey newspapers in recent months, have come as students are being asked to accept new sacrifices. Tuition, room and board for undergraduates increased 6.5 percent this year, and the state legislature cut funds to the university by 10.8 percent. On Monday, the president of Rutgers, Richard L. McCormick, delivered a pessimistic assessment of the institution's financial state amid the national economic crisis and asked top administrators to draw up plans in case the state cuts its financing again in the middle of the year. Sentiments on campus have changed dramatically since 2006, when the football team was the pride of Rutgers, attracting national attention by going 11-2 and nearly winning the Big East championship. University officials were quick to note that athletic department spending did not come at the expense of student services, like the bus system or classroom equipment. Rutgers's $50 million athletics budget -- a mix of private and public money, and revenue from sporting events -- accounted for less than 3 percent of the university's total budget.

New York Times

Greg Schiano, Gregory Shamus/Getty Images Greg Schiano, Gregory Shamus/Getty Images
October 18, 2008  09:37 AM ET

Rutgers has an opportunity of its lifetime to be nationally recognized and a winning athletics program (including football) greatly helps. Greg Schiano has done a geat job and needs every Rutges fan's. He's a "Jersey guy" and I couldn't imagine him anywhere else. Go Greg and go Rutgers!!!

October 18, 2008  12:33 PM ET

I'm not trying to provoke anyone, but IMO, Rutgers has a LOT further to go than they realize in order to truly become a national power. Sometimes the stars line up for a year or two and a team comes out of nowhere onto the national stage. To replicate that success year-in and year-out, however, takes so much more. Not to suggest that they never could be, but IMO, Rutgers isn't even close to that now.

October 18, 2008  01:08 PM ET
QUOTE(#2):

To replicate that success year-in and year-out, however, takes so much more. Not to suggest that they never could be, Rutgers isn't even close to that now.

A flash in the pan my friend, a flash in the pan.

October 18, 2008  03:22 PM ET

if 50 million is only 3% of the total budget what the heck is that school doing withe rest of the money some where around the $3 billion.

October 18, 2008  10:39 PM ET
QUOTE(#2):

I'm not trying to provoke anyone, but IMO, Rutgers has a LOT further to go than they realize in order to truly become a national power. Sometimes the stars line up for a year or two and a team comes out of nowhere onto the national stage. To replicate that success year-in and year-out, however, takes so much more. Not to suggest that they never could be, but IMO, Rutgers isn't even close to that now.

eyes, the problem in New Jersey is, it has never been a major college football market. So when Rutgers enjoyed that bit of success and bowl games for three straight years, the idiots in this silly state went crazy and jumped on the bandwagon. What too many of these silly people don't get is exactly what you explained. In this NYC-NJ market all sports fans who root for hometown teams have a New York Yankees-Steinbrenner mentality. As we know that thought process is not cohesive in following college football year in, year out. I've been to one Rutgers game this year (not a Rutgers fan but hey I'm in NJ so...) and I could not believe the sheer ignorance and stupidity of the people around me. Anyway, thanks for your comment on the matter.

October 18, 2008  10:40 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

if 50 million is only 3% of the total budget what the heck is that school doing withe rest of the money some where around the $3 billion.

It's Jersey. One never knows the exact path of the corruption.... This state stinks both literally and figuratively.

October 18, 2008  11:32 PM ET
QUOTE(#4):

if 50 million is only 3% of the total budget what the heck is that school doing withe rest of the money some where around the $3 billion.

It ain't going toward Schiano's haircuts, that coif reeks of Bo Rics!

 
October 20, 2008  01:59 PM ET

Schiano should have taken the job at Michigan...

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Agent: 'Extraordinary' interest in Bay
    Views
    4291
    Comments
    1887
  2. 2
    Vikings to consider L.A. move?
    Views
    60699
    Comments
    1872
  3. 3
    Mayo rebukes Bruschi's Belichick knock
    Views
    42158
    Comments
    251
  4. 4
    Can Iverson lure LeBron to Knicks?
    Views
    9300
    Comments
    175
  5. 5
    50 Cent's posse tussles with Marv Albert
    Views
    64988
    Comments
    130

Message Boards

  1. NBA > General NBA

    Iverson to the Cavaliers.
    Views
    270
    Replies
    1
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Are college football coaches…
    Views
    263
    Replies
    49
  3. NFL > Pittsburgh Steelers

    Big Ben accepts Blame for loss…
    Views
    195
    Replies
    39

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos