Truth & Rumors > MLB

Inside Marlins-Nationals trade

Views
8206
Comments
28

Josh Willingham and the other Marlins due to receive hefty pay raises through salary arbitration knew that many would not be returning next season. Money is always an object with the Marlins. But even Willingham was taken aback on Monday when he was told that he and pitcher Scott Olsen had been traded to the Washington Nationals. The two players were dealt to the Nationals in exchange for second baseman Emilio Bonifacio, a lightly seasoned 23-year-old with great speed and a good glove, along with a pair of minor-league prospects. Neither the Marlins nor Nationals would confirm the deal. But multiple sources said the division rivals agreed to the trade, the second the Marlins have made since the season ended. They traded first baseman Mike Jacobs to the Kansas City Royals last month for right-handed reliever Leo Nunez.

Miami Herald

Josh Willingham, Stephen Dunn/Getty Images Josh Willingham, Stephen Dunn/Getty Images
November 11, 2008  07:30 AM ET

The fire sale is on! And the Marlins didn't even win the Series this year...

November 11, 2008  07:30 AM ET

Bonifacio is a 'lightly seasoned' 23 yr old?! ****? LMAO
Who writes this stuff.....I needed a good laugh this morning.

November 11, 2008  07:31 AM ET

You can't even write W...T....F.....

November 11, 2008  08:10 AM ET

I wish the marlins would have gave away those players to the braves. I'm sure Atl could have come up with a better offer and we could have helped our pitching and OF problem with 2 relatively cheap players

November 11, 2008  08:14 AM ET

If Willingham is even remotely healthy, this is a great deal for the Nats. Bonifacio is a good glove but a terrible hitter and he was not the 2B of the future in Washington. Olsen is a nice, durable addition to a terrible rotation.

November 11, 2008  08:42 AM ET

So this trade makes the Nats a little better and the Marlins a little worse? Whatever.

November 11, 2008  08:50 AM ET

Wow I am sad to see Willingham and Olsen go....Tis a sad day indeed.

November 11, 2008  09:20 AM ET

I am a HUGE Marlins fan and a season ticket holder and I have no problem with this trade or the Jacobs trade. THe Marlins have several very very good bats in the minors that will be in the starting lineup next season (McPherson and Maybin). Even if they are only 75% of Willingham and Jacobs the Marlins are getting pieces that they need to fill other holes. If there is one thing that the Marlins management has proven is that they know talent. 75% of a player (rookie season of course) at the league min salery vs. 100% at 6million. I would take the rookies as well. I am sure the trades with the Marlins are not finished yet. Look for them to pickup an arm or two.

November 11, 2008  09:47 AM ET

The Marlins and Padres ownership must hang out at the same elitist country clubs and talk about how to proceed these days.

November 11, 2008  09:48 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

I wish the marlins would have gave away those players to the braves. I'm sure Atl could have come up with a better offer and we could have helped our pitching and OF problem with 2 relatively cheap players

It seems like everybody other than the Braves, including other divisional rivals have an easy time picking up developed talent from the Marlins during their regular fire sales. I don't know why the Braves are never involved.

November 11, 2008  09:48 AM ET

The irony here (in reference to my above comment) being that the Padres picked up Trevor Hoffman from the Marlins in their fire sale over a decade ago, and now the Padres appear to be dropping Hoffman in their present fire sale.

November 11, 2008  10:09 AM ET

Hoffman's drop is not a big suprise. 30 saves for $7.5 mil. They could call up a rookie and get 25-28 saves for 300K. He is indeed a hall of fame player but there is no reason to pay that kind of money for those results. The Marlins have shown how to put a solid, exciting team on the field for little money. You will see other teams following - perhaps the Padres. The only difference is that the Marlins have to do this. They receive no money out of the stadium (parking, concession, advertising, suites, etc) so they have to do this. Right or wrong, the only thing keeping the team afloat is the revenue sharing.

November 11, 2008  10:29 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

I wish the marlins would have gave away those players to the braves. I'm sure Atl could have come up with a better offer and we could have helped our pitching and OF problem with 2 relatively cheap players

Trade them to a (competitive) division rival? I think not...

November 11, 2008  10:52 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

Hoffman's drop is not a big suprise. 30 saves for $7.5 mil. They could call up a rookie and get 25-28 saves for 300K. He is indeed a hall of fame player but there is no reason to pay that kind of money for those results. The Marlins have shown how to put a solid, exciting team on the field for little money. You will see other teams following - perhaps the Padres. The only difference is that the Marlins have to do this. They receive no money out of the stadium (parking, concession, advertising, suites, etc) so they have to do this. Right or wrong, the only thing keeping the team afloat is the revenue sharing.

Your financial premise is dead on, but what it shows is that you have become accustomed to the Marlin's constant overturn of players once they begin to make money. Its not a knock, but its something most other teams' fans don't understand. Again, it has worked for them and no one can fault them for something that works. But, the Padres low-balling of their most tenured player, a player who is the face of their franchise, a player who took below market money to stay their previously, wreaks of disrepsect. Disrespect to the player and the fans who have come to see Hoffman & the Pads as one. Again, you're right that they can always find a cheaper player, but there comes a time when the extra few millions buys you more then just pure stats.

November 11, 2008  11:12 AM ET

Philly... you are probably right... I am just so used to the revolving door of players that I dont think I would know what to do if the Marlins had a player for 10 years. :-)

November 11, 2008  02:35 PM ET

What a negligible trade. When the very light amount of dust kicked up over this one has cleared, the Marlins lowered the average age on their roster by a couple of clicks, and have a little more elbow room in the clubhouse. Anyone remember the Nats saying they might "surprise a few people" this offseason, implying they would go for some real difference-makers, and move into contention? Surprise! The Nats still suck.

November 11, 2008  02:48 PM ET

Are the Marlins still saving up for their new stadium?

November 11, 2008  03:02 PM ET

I love the Marlins management! You want money? FU-you're gone!

November 11, 2008  03:09 PM ET
QUOTE(#16):

Surprise! The Nats still suck.

Are you trying to say that the Nats will SUCK this year? Well, that is a bit of a surprise considering they BLEW last year. :) 'Ello Atro!

 
November 11, 2008  03:34 PM ET

Thats why they have a tough time drawing fans at the stadium. The second you really like a player, he is traded.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Agent: 'Extraordinary' interest in Bay
    Views
    4621
    Comments
    1887
  2. 2
    Vikings to consider L.A. move?
    Views
    64481
    Comments
    1875
  3. 3
    Mayo rebukes Bruschi's Belichick knock
    Views
    44017
    Comments
    256
  4. 4
    Can Iverson lure LeBron to Knicks?
    Views
    9557
    Comments
    176
  5. 5
    50 Cent's posse tussles with Marv Albert
    Views
    67744
    Comments
    134

Throwdowns

Message Boards

  1. NBA > General NBA

    Iverson to the Cavaliers.
    Views
    314
    Replies
    1
  2. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    Are college football coaches…
    Views
    280
    Replies
    49
  3. NFL > Pittsburgh Steelers

    Big Ben accepts Blame for loss…
    Views
    216
    Replies
    40

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos