Truth & Rumors > NHL

Why Lightning fired Melrose

Views
5322
Comments
29

For Barry Melrose, there is no mystery why he was fired as the Lightning's coach. "They just didn't like the way the players responded to me," he said Friday, 90 minutes after he was let go. "The team wasn't playing the way they wanted, or playing up to expectations." So, as of 3:30 p.m., Melrose was done, a little more than four months after being hired and only 16 games into the season. Firing Melrose, 52, who left a 12-year gig as an ESPN analyst to join Tampa Bay, could cost $2.25-million, the full value of his three-year deal, if Melrose doesn't get another hockey job. Add the $1.3-million being paid former coach John Tortorella, fired in June, and you're talking serious dead money. Rick Tocchet, Melrose's associate coach, is interim head coach. "We're going to see what he can do and evaluate our options from there," said general manager Brian Lawton. The motivating factor. When Melrose was hired, his responsibility was to motivate. Tocchet handled the X's and O's. Melrose's ability to inspire was lauded by former players, including NHL great Wayne Gretzky, who starred on the Los Angeles Kings team Melrose led to the 1993 Stanley Cup final. But the Lightning was plagued by inconsistency. Even Melrose said, "All I asked for was a 60-minute effort every night. -- I wasn't able to get them to do it." There also were concerns about playing time for 2008 No. 1 draft choice Steven Stamkos, who is averaging 11:47 and recently lost his power-play time to underachieving Radim Vrbata.

St. Petersburg Times

Barry Melrose, AP Barry Melrose, AP
November 15, 2008  08:45 AM ET

Au revior Mullet, we hardly knew you this time around.

November 15, 2008  08:46 AM ET

Or, if you prefer--And I would have gotten away with it if it wasn't for you meddling owners!

November 15, 2008  09:46 AM ET

i think this team will suffer from its meddling owners. who knows Melrose could've done better in a different enviroment

November 15, 2008  09:59 AM ET

You kinda got the sense that he wouldn't make it through the full season when it was announced he would be hired

November 15, 2008  10:07 AM ET

I said back on T&R when they hired him that he'd never make the all star break.....but didn't think it would be this quick. On the bright side..the owners of this team will drive it so far down maybe the midget will move them to a REAL hockey city........nahhhh cuz that would make sense...and we all know the midget has no sense

November 15, 2008  10:17 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

I said back on T&R when they hired him that he'd never make the all star break.....but didn't think it would be this quick. On the bright side..the owners of this team will drive it so far down maybe the midget will move them to a REAL hockey city........nahhhh cuz that would make sense...and we all know the midget has no sense

Please do not ever use the word "sense" and the Poison Dwarf in the samw sentence again. ;)

November 15, 2008  10:20 AM ET

*same

November 15, 2008  12:15 PM ET

Melrose is a legend in his own mind. His old stale style of thinking doesn't work in this era. It was a rediculous hire in the first place. Anyone who watched him on ESPN knew that. Giving up that cush job in the first place, should have told you all you need to know about his decision making.

November 15, 2008  12:44 PM ET

So, could you say the Lightning are taking a "gamble" with Tocchet.

November 15, 2008  12:46 PM ET

I don't get it. Honestly, 16 games into the season? Give the players some time to respond to him. It's not like they're 0-16 either. Sure they aren't playing well, but you could fire half of the coaches in the NHL just because their teams aren't playing well. Can't wait to see him back on ESPN.

November 15, 2008  01:10 PM ET
QUOTE(#9):

So, could you say the Lightning are taking a "gamble" with Tocchet.

Ba dum dum dum tsssh! Thank you boys!

November 15, 2008  01:23 PM ET

No one can coach that team to win. The owners are hyped up because they feel they are hockey geniuses. They have Rechi and Olie, two players well passed their prime. Malone, that was a good role player that will never be a 30+ goal scorer and that poor rookie that those morons were hyping to be a Crosby or AO. Expect to see alot of dysfunction until the owners bring in some that actually has some hockey sense.

November 15, 2008  02:42 PM ET

he sucks as a coach and sucks has a analyst

November 15, 2008  02:47 PM ET

Tampa was wrong for firing Torts IMO. He lead them to a Cup!

Melrose didn't have much to work with D-wise. If Malik can help your D that says enough right there. They have a new goaltender in the making also. He definitely didn't get along with the players; you could even see it on the bench during the games. One game, when St Louis scored his second goal and got out of a drought and was all excited he kept trying to get him to sit down. PAT HIM ON THE BACK AND TRY AND BREATHE SOME LIFE INTO THE TEAM INSTEAD OF BEING A DEPRESSING PUNK!

Aside from limiting icetime for young stars like Vinny LC and St Louis, he just didn't get along with his players.

November 15, 2008  02:51 PM ET
QUOTE(#15):

Tampa was wrong for firing Torts IMO. He lead them to a Cup!Melrose didn't have much to work with D-wise. If Malik can help your D that says enough right there. They have a new goaltender in the making also. He definitely didn't get along with the players; you could even see it on the bench during the games. One game, when St Louis scored his second goal and got out of a drought and was all excited he kept trying to get him to sit down. PAT HIM ON THE BACK AND TRY AND BREATHE SOME LIFE INTO THE TEAM INSTEAD OF BEING A DEPRESSING PUNK!Aside from limiting icetime for young stars like Vinny LC and St Louis, he just didn't get along with his players.

Agreed, they never should hace fired Torts.

November 15, 2008  03:01 PM ET

*have

November 15, 2008  03:37 PM ET

I don't know what to think of this. It's pretty obvious, though, that he should have been an assistant for a year or two before being allowed back in as a head coach. All the same, it's not like the team was 0-16-0. They were just a couple of games under .500. Apparently these guys forgot that they had the #1 overall pick in the draft this past June.

November 15, 2008  05:10 PM ET

I called it! I called it!

November 15, 2008  05:27 PM ET

i guess espn isn't all powerful after all

 
November 15, 2008  06:15 PM ET

First of all these Owners are the New Yankees of the sport, they fire people quicker then watching the economy drops. Also this is not Melrose fault they signed all those free agents and acquired all those players before Melrose came in. What if those players didnt fit in Melrose system? The owners did not take that in consideration.

Tort should come back(No chance in h*ll.)

Well Tocchet at least knew the over and under of Melrose being fired.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Stub Hub

The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Bills owner wanted Gruden
    Views
    54185
    Comments
    383
  2. 2
    Why Knicks passed on Iverson
    Views
    23569
    Comments
    89
  3. 3
    Raiders players happy with new QB
    Views
    10224
    Comments
    86
  4. 4
    Yankees keeping eye on Halladay
    Views
    45392
    Comments
    83
  5. 5
    Seahawks interested in Holmgren?
    Views
    9206
    Comments
    54

Message Boards

  1. NCAAF > General NCAAF

    2009's most disappointing team
    Views
    359
    Replies
    21
  2. NCAAF > LSU Tigers

    Les Miles FIRE HIM
    Views
    91
    Replies
    16
  3. NCAAB > General NCAAB

    Ed Davis
    Views
    43
    Replies
    3

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos