Truth & Rumors > MLB

Yankees considering confidentiality pacts

Views
14496
Comments
64

06:37 AM ET 01.29 | The Yankees are considering including a "non-disparagement clause" in future player and managerial contracts in order to prevent any more tell-all books such as "The Yankee Years," co-written by Joe Torre and Tom Verducci. Speaking on the condition of anonymity, a Yankee official said yesterday that some members of the front office staff already are required to sign a confidentiality agreement in order to protect "proprietary knowledge of our business model." The proposed clause is intended to ensure that future books about the Yankees are "positive in tone," and "do not breach the sanctity of our clubhouse." The Yankees are said to feel betrayed by Torre's book, which has been interpreted as critical of some players, most notably Alex Rodriguez, and inaccurate in its recounting of the October 2007 meeting in Tampa at which Torre and the club agreed to part ways after four world championships and 12 consecutive playoff appearances. Confidentiality agreements, some with meticulously spelled out rules and stipulated monetary penalties for their violation, are standard equipment in most contracts between celebrities and their hired staffs, as well as between corporations and their CEOs. The Mets are believed to have included similar clauses in their contracts with former manager Willie Randolph and former pitching coach Rick Peterson. Up to now, the Yankees never have included them in the contract of a player or manager.

New York Newsday

Joe Torre, Stephen Dunn/Getty Images Joe Torre, Stephen Dunn/Getty Images
January 29, 2009  06:47 AM ET

A lot of companies do this. Right or wrong,. it isn't uncommon... I am surprised more teams HAVEN'T done this sooner.

January 29, 2009  07:19 AM ET

I just knew Dick Cheney was a consultant for the Yankees...

January 29, 2009  07:52 AM ET
QUOTE(#1):

A lot of companies do this. Right or wrong,. it isn't uncommon... I am surprised more teams HAVEN'T done this sooner.

I'm surprised as well, but it still doesn't look good when a team feels they need to include such clauses.

January 29, 2009  08:03 AM ET
QUOTE(#3):

I'm surprised as well, but it still doesn't look good when a team feels they need to include such clauses.

Every organization, whether a sports team or not, gives its key employees access to information that would be damaging if they were to go out and sell it to someone else.

The surprise is that in sports, where the lure of selling an inside scope is so attractive, it isn't more common. Celebs do it all the time for the same reason; do you really need the nanny telling People Magazine what sort of fungus cream you have in your medicine chest?

Same thing.

January 29, 2009  08:10 AM ET
QUOTE(#4):

Every organization, whether a sports team or not, gives its key employees access to information that would be damaging if they were to go out and sell it to someone else.The surprise is that in sports, where the lure of selling an inside scope is so attractive, it isn't more common. Celebs do it all the time for the same reason; do you really need the nanny telling People Magazine what sort of fungus cream you have in your medicine chest?Same thing.

I think the reason you don't see it more often is by giving up the secrets you seriously hurt any future chance at getting a job. And if you already retired and don't have to worry about future employment, being a snitch can lead to tarnishing your reputation. Here in NY Torre is being ripped, and for good reason. He trashed the Canseco book, saying dinner table stuff shouldn't be published. He trashed David Wells for writing a book. Torre has come across as a hypocrite to the fans in NY who have read and heard those comments and now see him doing the same thing he condemned.

January 29, 2009  08:15 AM ET

This is no surprise. When you throw out something so valuable, you are bound to have repercussions. So Torre told it how he saw it, thats what you get when u abuse people. I support Torre 100%. The clause is good for the orginization.

January 29, 2009  08:15 AM ET

What business model? Is trying to buy a championship every year considered a business model? If so, a confidentiality pact won't stop that knowledge from getting around, it's pretty well known already...

January 29, 2009  08:17 AM ET
QUOTE(#5):

I think the reason you don't see it more often is by giving up the secrets you seriously hurt any future chance at getting a job. And if you already retired and don't have to worry about future employment, being a snitch can lead to tarnishing your reputation. Here in NY Torre is being ripped, and for good reason. He trashed the Canseco book, saying dinner table stuff shouldn't be published. He trashed David Wells for writing a book. Torre has come across as a hypocrite to the fans in NY who have read and heard those comments and now see him doing the same thing he condemned.

I wish the threat of being blackballed if you share secrets was enough to keep people from doing it, but the money will always win the day. That's why confidentiality agreements are so common in every other business. If you're middle management or better in any decent-sized company in this country, you've probably signed one. I sure have.

And I agree 100% on why Torre is getting ripped; it's blatantly hypocritical AND a bad message to his current players. If I'm a Dodger, I think twice before taking an problem to the skipper.

But the fact that he wrote it illustrates why these agreements work...the threat of legal action for breaking the agreement needs to be bigger than the financial reward of doing so, or people will keep kissing and telling. Especially when they've worked for someone/something famous.

January 29, 2009  08:55 AM ET

Can we hear from the Torre defenders? Its been almost sacrilegious to talk bad about him in NY for years. So lets see, he's a washed up hack who was an announcer before the Yanks pulled him out of the scrap heap. They shower him with the best players and all the resources he needs to win. Is that good enough? NOOOOOO the guy leaves and bashes the team that recreated him.

Good job Joe. Next time I see you on that stupid commercial surfing, lets pray for the shark to win that one.

Sincerely,

Non Yankee fan

January 29, 2009  09:00 AM ET
QUOTE(#9):

Can we hear from the Torre defenders? Its been almost sacrilegious to talk bad about him in NY for years. So lets see, he's a washed up hack who was an announcer before the Yanks pulled him out of the scrap heap. They shower him with the best players and all the resources he needs to win. Is that good enough? NOOOOOO the guy leaves and bashes the team that recreated him. Good job Joe. Next time I see you on that stupid commercial surfing, lets pray for the shark to win that one.Sincerely,Non Yankee fan

They kinda left him hanging with that bogus contract offer, and they also left him out of the closing ceremonies for the Stadium. Turnabout is fair play. What, this book is gonna give up something that suddenly makes every team find the formula to win multiple championships? Feh.

January 29, 2009  09:00 AM ET

Go phils

January 29, 2009  09:04 AM ET
QUOTE(#10):

They kinda left him hanging with that bogus contract offer, and they also left him out of the closing ceremonies for the Stadium. Turnabout is fair play. What, this book is gonna give up something that suddenly makes every team find the formula to win multiple championships? Feh.

Its not so much about the article above. Rather that he wrote this book. I've always thought he was an extremely overrated mgr with a fantastic front office who would do anything to win.

Lets just say he was less than stellar in his previous mgr stops. Lets not forget that without the Yankees, he isnt managing in LA, making commercials, or writing books. Its a bit disingenuous to go back and bite the hand that made him a wealthy wealthy man.

January 29, 2009  09:23 AM ET
QUOTE(#12):

Its not so much about the article above. Rather that he wrote this book. I've always thought he was an extremely overrated mgr with a fantastic front office who would do anything to win. Lets just say he was less than stellar in his previous mgr stops. Lets not forget that without the Yankees, he isnt managing in LA, making commercials, or writing books. Its a bit disingenuous to go back and bite the hand that made him a wealthy wealthy man.

Gotta agree with that. I don't think he's sharing top secrets, but he is bringing bad press.

No company wants that, which is why most make you shut up when you leave. The Yanks handled his exit very poorly, and he's mad about it. But he should have taken his considerable money, the resume that got him his LA job, and kept quiet about the whole thing.

Instead, he's probably hurting himself more than he is the Yankees.

January 29, 2009  09:40 AM ET

Maybe if they stop acting like a bunch of idiots, then no one would write bad things about them. Besides, what are they now, thin-skinned like A-Rod and Giambi? Sticks and stones...

Also, regarding this laughable phrase, "proprietary knowledge of our business model"...what a joke. I think everyone pretty much knows it already.

January 29, 2009  09:46 AM ET
QUOTE(#14):

regarding this laughable phrase, "proprietary knowledge of our business model"...what a joke. I think everyone pretty much knows it already.

So why is it the O's or Nats haven't won more than one World Series between them in 25 years? Biding their time, are they?

January 29, 2009  09:57 AM ET
QUOTE(#15):

So why is it the O's or Nats haven't won more than one World Series between them in 25 years? Biding their time, are they?

Not enough money...when he says that everyone already knows it...it is because every does, but they can't neccessarily copy it.

Here is the business model: "We are the Yankees and our primary business goal is to the spend the most money in the offseason. Why, because we can and that will show the world who is king"

January 29, 2009  09:58 AM ET
QUOTE(#15):

So why is it the O's or Nats haven't won more than one World Series between them in 25 years? Biding their time, are they?

Well the Nats and O's are not baseball teams so much as they are cash cows for their owners. They know the Yankee business model leads to them receiving revenue sharing checks every year and that is great for their bottom line. Just look how well the Marlins are doing. Sure their record isn't so great but their isn't any red ink in their balance sheets.

January 29, 2009  09:59 AM ET
QUOTE(#16):

Not enough money...when he says that everyone already knows it...it is because every does, but they can't neccessarily copy it. Here is the business model: "We are the Yankees and our primary business goal is to the spend the most money in the offseason. Why, because we can and that will show the world who is king"

The Yanks go on one spending spree in the last 5 years and everyone gets their panties in a bunch. They didn't sign anyone from 2005-2008 and they got flak from the media and other fans. They shift gears and spend some money and they still are getting criticism. Just seems they can't win and some people will always find a reason to complain.

January 29, 2009  10:06 AM ET

That's because they are hoping the whole Derek Jeter/Jorge Posada shower love scene story never gets out...

 
January 29, 2009  10:09 AM ET

The Yankees didn't sign anyone from 2005 to 2008? I guess Johnny Damon played for the Red Sox all those years. Ignorant remarks like that is why we non-Yankees fans find you Yankees fans so moronically despicable. It's honestly not the players we hate (in most instances, ARod and Jeter are both easily detestable), it's the fans and their utter lack of knowledge about their team other than the word "rings", of which there is an ongoing 8 year drought, in case you forget.

Comment

Remember to keep your posts clean. Profanity will get filtered, and offensive comments will be removed.


The Si.com Cover Hub Go to the Cover Hub

Sports Tickets From TicketCity

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    Carroll refusing to play it safe in Seattle
    Views
    18005
    Comments
    1482
  2. 2
    WADA: MLB's stance on testing is 'nonsense'
    Views
    4694
    Comments
    604
  3. 3
    Orr calls focus on winger Cooke 'silly'
    Views
    13622
    Comments
    316
  4. 4
    LeBron more interested in joining Knicks if ...
    Views
    24382
    Comments
    216
  5. 5
    Jordan promises to rule as active owner
    Views
    43750
    Comments
    130

Most Active Users

Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns

  1. 1
    Chico 2.0
  2. 2
    BBK - ready for opening day
  3. 3
    rstowe
  4. 4
    gigi_iv
  5. 5
    Never NDing Struggle

Message Boards

  1. MMA > General MMA

    THE UFC LIGHT-HEAVYWEIGHT…
    Views
    25
    Replies
    2

Blogs

SI.com

Swimsuit

SI Photos