By your standards, Trent Dilfer "won" a Super Bowl. Maybe the other 10 players on Offense, and the Ravens' defense, had something to do with that result, too. Just sayin'.
QB X's TEAM won 4 Championships. QB Y's TEAM won 3. Therefore, QB X is better than QB Y. Lazy thinking. There are 10 other players in an NFL offense. To say nothing about the defensive side of the ball. Try again.
Only one problem: The Read Option offense requires a QB who can pass. At Nevada, Kaepernick's sidearm throwing motion was ugly. Coach Ault and Kaep worked one entire off season to fix his throwing mechanics.
Howard isn't half the natural scorer that Love is ... and never will be. Love has both an inside AND an outside game, so Rubio has more chances to find him. Nothing in your proposed trade benefits the Wolves.
Do you follow sports at all? I mean ~all~ sports, not just football. FB teams are early in their seasons. Baseball pennant races and wildcard spots are coming down to the wire.
Denver's defense also played a large part. As a QB, Tebow did very little for three quarters of most of those games, but the defense kept the Broncos close enough to make Tebow magic a factor in the 4th quarter.
Tebow has all the intangibles: competitive drive, leadership, and a belief in himself. The tangibles? Not so much. Poor throwing mechanics, lack of accuracy on short, quick passes, and an inability to read defenses.
Can he improve? Sure. But I wouldn't bet on it. He's been playing the QB position his way since he was a kid.
Tebow has not demonstrated he can do that.
Enough FB. More BB.
I'd say "nice try", but that would compliment your post.
Tebow has all the intangibles: competitive drive, leadership, and a belief in himself. The tangibles? Not so much. Poor throwing mechanics, lack of accuracy on short, quick passes, and an inability to read defenses.
Can he improve? Sure. But I wouldn't bet on it. He's been playing the QB position his way since he was a kid.
Why would Manning want to fuel a media blitz of Know-Nothing comments? Answer: he wouldn't.
<snicker>