hokiegooner
hokiegooner's Comments
More FanHouse Blogs
- Thanksgiving Football Schedule 2009
- Reliving Allen Iverson Practice Rant
- Michaele Salahi Crashes White House Dinner
- Iverson Announces Intention to Retire
- NFL Picks: Week 12
- Talking the Talk With Gus Johnson
- Andruw Jones Signs With White Sox
- Alicia Sacramone Dating Brady Quinn
- Abe Pollin Dies at Age 85
- NFL Power Rankings Week 12
Stub Hub
The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
Red Sox-Jays deal-killer?
- Views
- 45505
- Comments
- 1199
-
2
Martz to jump-start Bears offense?
- Views
- 16897
- Comments
- 1045
-
3
Notre Dame cancels Weis' recruiting trip
- Views
- 54617
- Comments
- 339
-
4
Miami: Less Gators, more Bulls
- Views
- 9676
- Comments
- 271
-
5
Artest: Free agents 'scared' to play in NY
- Views
- 57191
- Comments
- 197
Most Active Users
Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns
Message Boards
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
No More 'Canes and Gators
- Views
- 430
- Replies
- 66
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
Week 13 Predictions (Rivalry…
- Views
- 304
- Replies
- 18
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
FCS playoffs, a tested…
- Views
- 184
- Replies
- 20


Alison Preston
Deanna Clover



I think its a ridiculous process, something that makes the league look all the more silly.
Also, the allocation for a player such as Dinho would magically work its way back around to where Galaxy get the first choice? Shady stuff. I wish the league would operate on a legitimate base.
Personally, I think he will either leave this summer, or next. Can't see him staying for the length of his contract.
I know that lost of teams have SC attached to their name in Europe, so i really have no problem with that. But its contradictory of so many people who are against using European names for the teams here in America. Just as quickly as they are to point out that its dumb to have a European name or moniker, they then say that we should use SC on the end of the name, not knowing how many European clubs use the same thing.
@ BuffaloTF
Thats what I think as well. the only problem with the Philadelpia team is though, from what I hear, they won't actually be playing in Philadelphia, and instead outside of the city. I understand that it would be harder to get a stadium inside the city, I just think a team should be named from where they are from, and not the biggest city they are associated with.
Seriously though, the no FC thing makes no sense. Just because Americans lack to vision to accurately describe their own sport, doesnt mean that us actual football fans should have to suffer with a SC. Throwball would do wonders for actually describing American football, as opposed to football being called 'football'.
Another example would be the name for the basic premise of american football. A touchdown. Any guess as to where touchdown comes from? Ah, rugby. Where you actually have to touch the ball, to the ground, to get credit for a try. American football, not so much? You just kinda have to get the ball near the area, sometimes at least.
Also, a nickname isnt the only descriptive way for which you can name a team. The name of the club itself can be descriptive. For example, there are many teams in London. But they aren't called London "(Insert nickname here)". Instead, there name gives a description of their location. Chelsea and fulham are Burroughs of london, in the same manner that the Bronx and Manhattan are to new york. Arsenal, used to be located next to, an arsenal! So instead of naming a team New York Red Bulls, you could instead named them The Bronx Red Bulls (provided thats where they actually play) The Washington Redskins dont play in Washington anymore (they use to), so why are they still called washington?
Anyways, to make a quick point, I dont want any SC teams, because I dont think its right to name a team after Santa Claus. Plus if we had a bunch of SC's then it might be hard for Santa to choose one.
Phulham
Ben-fica
Ben's Old Boys (Newell's Old Boys is a team in argentina)
AC Philly
Sporting Philly
North Carolina does not have any teams-- you could put 1 in or around somewhere in Carolina.
Rochester-- They have the USL team there, but instead of trying to compete with another team in the area, why not just invite Rochester and other established teams into the MLS
Philadelphia would support a team, as would St. Louis. I'm sure you could fit a few in Florida, maybe one more in Texas. Also, you could easily put another Mexican supported team in LA. Imagine a team sponsored by by America or Pachuca to rival the Chivas sponsored Chivas USA team.
And finally, both DC and New York could support more team. Probably only one more in DC, but in New York, possibly 1-2 more teams. Like they have done in LA, they could try to get an Italian club such as Inter or AC (or even both) along with Juventus to sponsor teams in New York, and tap into the Italian culture in New York.