I just can't believe that winning percentage is being used to evaluate a pitcher's "best years". That's hideous.
Haren has been a top 10 pitcher in each of the last 3 seasons, yet the Angels' trade didn't get nearly the press that the other other major deals involving starters did.
And I'm only "back" to support BBK in this racist environment.
Which of those doesn't work for you?
Haren has been a top 10 pitcher in each of the last 3 seasons, yet the Angels' trade didn't get nearly the press that the other other major deals involving starters did.
Calling Dan Haren mediocre is nonsense.