You leave out that teams like Baltimore, Oakland, Pittsburgh and Tampa sucked for so long that they were able to stockpile high draft picks. The Spankees don't have that luxury.
What are you basing your opinion on? I'm no fan of Randy Johnson but hard to argue with his numbers, though his AL NL split are dramatic. One stat though that does stick in my mind, that list I referenced earlier where Mussina was 9th all time, Johnson is like 4th or 5th, winning percentage relative to teams he pitcher for, that's a number that I give a lot weight.
It might surprise you that Mussina's winning percentage relative to the winning percentage of the teams he pitched for is significantly better than Carlton's though as you point out this could be because it he became a circus act those last 5 years. That said, Mussina is I believe 9th in baseball history when ranked as such for pitchers with more than 175 wins, right behind Seaver.
I kind of agree, too many were culpable in the "steroid" era, perhaps least of all the players themselves. We'll never know who did and to what degree.
excellent point, I'm surprised we left that one out.
Great line from Jim Palmer years ago after seeing a ball called "high" said if they called the strike zone then like they call it now I wouldn't be in the Hall of Fame.
ahh, just don't like Clemens much, though I must admit, PEDS aside, and that's a big aside, a case could be made Clemens was best pitcher in history. Immediatley throws up.
Ha, he's a lock. Now that writers are getting their head out of their rearends and looking at numbers with a little more nuance what Mussina accomplished in that division in that era will looked at more intelligently.
Great line from Jim Palmer years ago after seeing a ball called "high" said if they called the strike zone then like they call it now I wouldn't be in the Hall of Fame.
Slink, can you get on that one, ha.