The Republic of Sport

mashley278

mashley278's Comments

Posted Tuesday November 03, 2009, About: Carroll changing USC's scheme

And YOU SHOULD play a tough out of conference schedule, with UW, WSU, Stanford, UCLA, San Jose State and NO conference champ game, geesh, glad you play ND and OSU.

Posted Tuesday November 03, 2009, About: Carroll changing USC's scheme

Oh so Ohio State (perenially embarrassed and overrated outside their conference), San Jose State, and Notre Dame...hmmm
Dude USC lost to UW...That's like Alabama losing to Mississippi State, or Texas losing to Baylor, or Florida losing to Kentucky...oh yeah, sorry all those teams also have to play conference championships.
Face it, if USC had lost to UW, then beat Oregon, USC would win the PAC 10 - and not even be the best team in the conference

Posted Tuesday November 03, 2009, About: Carroll changing USC's scheme

And the media...oh Lord, the media. Last year when they played in the Rose Bowl, you would have thought Jesus Christ himself was quarterbacking them. Not to mention they immediately threw Matt Barkley in the Heisman discussion AFTER ONE FRIGGIN GAME. You know, the more I think about it, it reminds me of FSU in the late 80's and early 90's. Hotbed of recruiting, and horrible teams within your conference. Ranked high every year no matter what, win one NC and suddenly you can't be beat and reside in the top 5 no matter what.

Posted Tuesday November 03, 2009, About: Carroll changing USC's scheme

Really? WHO CARES??? It will just be another year of the USC team and fans whining saying "they won out" and "played well down the stretch" and now deserve a shot at the national title. Every year USC loses to a mediocre (at BEST) team and every year they win the remaining games and start whining. This is from a team that doesn't even play a conference championship (I can hear it now "but we play EVERY team in our conference!") - ok let me play this out for you USC fans. Say Florida wins out and LSU beats Bama this weekend - that would mean Florida AND LSU would have to play the toughest team in their conference...TWICE to get to the NCG. Just like the very first year with Bama in 92 and a number of other teams down the road. USC - YOU ARE OUT OF THE PICTURE - GO AWAY

Posted Monday September 21, 2009, About: Carroll backs USC's play-caller

Who cares - it's a repeat year after year. USC loses to some unranked team, then win out and whine when they don't get to play in the title game over SEC and Big 12 teams that play championship games.

Posted Monday September 21, 2009, About: USC's starting QB will be...

Posted Tuesday September 01, 2009, About: Why Beamer doesn't feel good about Hokies

The greatest part about the following is that the PAthetic 10 has to send their absolute best to play the mediocre SEC opponents:
SEC vs. Pac-10 Results Since 2000
2000 UCLA 35, Alabama 24 (at Los Angeles)
2001 UCLA 20, Alabama 17 (at Tuscaloosa)
2002 USC 24, Auburn 17 (at Los Angeles)
2002 Oregon 36, Miss. St. 13 (at Eugene)
2003 Oregon 42, Miss. St. 34 (at Starkville)
2003 USC 23, Auburn 0 (at Auburn)
2003 LSU 59, Arizona 13 (at Tuscon)
2004 LSU 22, Oregon State 21 (at Baton Rouge)
2005 LSU 31, Arizona State 31 (at Tempe)
2005 USC 70, Arkansas 17 (at Los Angeles)
2006 USC 50, Arkansas 14 (at Fayetteville)
2006 Auburn 40, Wash. St. 14 (at Auburn)
2006 LSU 45, Arizona 3 (at Baton Rouge)
2006 Tennessee 35, Cal 18 (at Knoxville)
2007 Cal 45, Tennessee 31 (at Berkley)
2008 UCLA 27, Tennessee 24 (at Los Angeles)

Posted Tuesday September 01, 2009, About: Why Beamer doesn't feel good about Hokies

Wow, do you really pay attention to CFB at all? Let's see: Ok, a great example - 1999 Bama has to play Steve Spurrier and UF in the regular season, they won, then had to play them again in the SEC Championship. The PAthetiC-10 has no such requirement. They ease through the boringly sad competition and perenial losers (ASU, UA, WSU, UW, Stanford - and lets face it, OSU/Oregon/Cal choke on a weekly basis), then SHAZAM! You are automatically given a birth to the Rose Bowl. Let's look at the PAthetic-10's week one matchups (out of conference) - Boise State, San Diego State, Portland State, Maryland, Central Michigan, Idaho State and LSU. You want to rag on the SEC for their OOC games? The first week has VT, UW, and Oklahoma State. Later games include FSU, Louisville, CAL, West V, ASU, Georgia Tech x 2, Texas A&M, and Clemson. Oh and by the way, don't you guys play something like a pansy 9 games?

Posted Tuesday September 01, 2009, About: Why Beamer doesn't feel good about Hokies

Let's see - PAC 10: Stanford, WSU, UW, etc = Tulane, Western Kentucky, and Arky St.
You live in LA and bash UT, Arkansas, and Auburn??? HAHAHAHAHAH The Pac 10 doesn't even count as a legitimate conference is USC wasn't playing and they CHOKE every year. Losing to an undefeated Utah is not near as bad as losing to a Oregon State in front of 10,000 people in their stadium! Your whole argument is baseless considering 80% of your entire conference is garbage and play in itty bitty stadiums. In fact, you don't even have to play in a championship game AND THAT IS THE BIGGEST FRIGGIN JOKE OF ALL.

Posted Monday August 31, 2009, About: Inside Michigan's alleged illegal workouts

WAAA WAAAA...how many of these players have had the success that Rodriguez has had? I'm not a Michigan fan (BAMA FAN) and I am definitely sticking up for Rodridguez. I work 65 hour weeks and I still bust my **** two hours a day in the gym - FOR FREE. These whiners can't do a little more for a free education and the glory of being a winner?

Posted Friday July 31, 2009, About: Seahawks interested in Vick?

That "rain" comment is nothing but a MYTH. In fact, Seattle hasn't seen rain since early May. The weather here is PERFECT.

Posted Friday July 31, 2009, About: Seahawks interested in Vick?

I love Seattle and Portland, hell even Boise isn't bad.

Posted Friday July 31, 2009, About: Seahawks interested in Vick?

Huh? I've lived all over the US, and it basically sucks everywhere else. I wouldn't live anywhere BUT the Northwest.

Posted Friday July 31, 2009, About: Seahawks interested in Vick?

I live in Seattle, and what they fail to mention is that this is an EXTREMELY animal friendly city. Very few people are without a pet here. There is NO way, win or lose, the community would EVER except this trash. This would be a PR nightmare for the Seahawks. If the 'Hawks were to sign this piece of garbage, I for one, would never give that organization a dime of my money. Besides VICK IS A CRAPPY QB, he runs fast WOO HOO, his accuracy SUCKS and he's obviously not intelligent enough to play the QB position effectively.

Posted Saturday May 09, 2009, About: Vikings Plan B: Vick or Anderson?

Anyone remember the boat scandal? Seems to me they tried to get rid of all the troublemakers. I'm not huge Vike fan, but I do like them and I really like Petersen (and where did Diva come from? He's a workout fanatic). On the other hand, Vick's a thug - plain and simple. Not only because he fought dogs, but mainly because he took pleasure in torturing them to death. The moment he steps back into the league, I'm done. And don't give me that crap about Leonard Little - he didn't intentionally kill someone for fun. He's an idiot and he screwed up, but Vick did the things he did for kicks. CFB is more exciting and real anyway.

Posted Monday March 02, 2009, About: Vols coaches rip off shirts

This actually seems like a moment from the "Office" to me where there was probably an awkward silence...I wish someone had filmed these dorks doing this

Posted Monday March 02, 2009, About: Vols coaches rip off shirts

YES! YES! YES! As an Alabama fan you HAVE to love this awkward stupidity!!!

Posted Saturday February 21, 2009, About: Teams that might take Vick

Mike needs a date with Travis the Chimp....

Posted Friday February 20, 2009, About: Teams that might take Vick

As far as anger goes? Maybe I do need classes when it comes to bullies hurting kids and animals. Only a weak **** punk with a small d*** would beat up on a dog.

Posted Friday February 20, 2009, About: Teams that might take Vick

"most people" and DWI is not a felony in all states. DWI does also not involve intent to harm. It involves stupidity

Posted Friday February 20, 2009, About: Teams that might take Vick

HellRaiser - yes we would've gotten time if we had bankrolled the whole and tortured the dogs. Had he just been involved (which is still sick) he would've gotten a slap on the wrist