Sularus92
Sularus92's Comments
More FanHouse Blogs
- Boxer Francisco Rodriguez Dies After Bout
- Kimbo Slice Announced for TUF 10 Finale
- A New Chapter in Classic Magic-Bird Tale
- MLB Rumors Heating Up
- Jimmie Johnson Wins 4th Straight Title
- Eric Wood Injury Too Brutal for TV Replay
- FCS Playoff Schedule
- BCS Rankings Week 13
- Rick Hendrick Misses Season Finale
- Amir Sadollah Bloodies Phil Baroni
Stub Hub
The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
Chargers accuse McDaniels of trash talk
- Views
- 19939
- Comments
- 2716
-
2
Source: Damon won't take pay cut
- Views
- 48151
- Comments
- 967
-
3
Should Notre Dame join Big Ten?
- Views
- 19119
- Comments
- 226
-
4
Weis won't resign
- Views
- 40033
- Comments
- 216
-
5
Beckham won't own Montreal team
- Views
- 1071
- Comments
- 179
Most Active Users
Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns
Message Boards
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
What happens if Bama and UT…
- Views
- 376
- Replies
- 31
-
MMA > General MMA
Arlovski's next fight -…
- Views
- 297
- Replies
- 7
-
NCAAF > Ohio State Buckeyes
Season Analysis
- Views
- 204
- Replies
- 31

Irina Shayk
Cheney Larschied



For an argument that claims that everybody can be racist to be valid, two things have to be true: (1) all racial groups must exist in a state of equality a priori and (2) racism must be reduced to (a) race prejudice and/or (b) purposeful action, the goal of which is the oppression of a racialized group. Concerning (1), it's a empirical fact that racial groups exist in a state of inequality, and this fact will be referenced throughout my comments. Racism is a form of inequality, which bring me to the second assumption.
Concerning (2), racism is more than prejudice and purposeful action based on race (which require no inequality). Conveniently, the reduction of racism to these things is the racist's definition of racism. With such a definition in operation, it becomes impossible to fight racism because the very act of fighting racism becomes interpreted as racist in itself. In order to end racism, we must take away white privilege (which means whites lose stuff) and radically restructure society. With the racist's definition of racism in play, the racial consciousness and purposeful action based on race necessary to carry out this radical restructuring will be judged racist. Thus anti-racism becomes racism, which is obviously a self-sealing fallacy. This is analogous to Ayn Rand enthusiasts arguing that all behavior, including altruism, is selfish behavior (and therefore open selfishness is virtuous). The purpose of both arguments, however fallacious, is to perpetuate an unjust state of affairs. In other words, don't so anything to end racism lest you be racist. But in reality, failing to end racism is racist.
The way out of the paradox is develop an understanding of power. Fortunately, we have the social scientific and anti-racist understanding of racism to help us with this: racism = discrimination + power + oppressive group effects. This means that racism concerns institutional and, more broadly, structural power and outcomes that systematically benefit one group to the disadvantage of another or other groups.