If it's medicinal marijuana, I'm all for it.

Give him Kelsey Grammer's "Fraiser" voice, and I'd follow him to the moon.

But if I don't quote the post, I'll forget what I'm responding to. We old folks are forgetful, ya know.

Too busy waiting for the Metal Gear Solid HD Collection and Skyrim to come out.

The prior arguments, or raising my post-count? Because I'm more interested in the latter than I am digging out all those old posts for you on the former.

Whooooo! It's almost hump-day!

Again, the conversation on that between you and I ended quite awhile ago. As soon as you actually want to rationally and diplomatically respond to my prior arguments, we can start is up again. Until then though, I'm going to cut loose and just enjoy raising my post-count for no reason whatsoever.

Well, who in their right mind could resist that Simpson villain hairdo?

This conversation is sooooo ten minutes ago. Cut loose. BANZAI!

Going Brazilian? Nice.

None taken. It's just the internet.

We had two at Grille #27 in the Short North. Good times. Not as good as it was when we made it to the Finals, but good times nonetheless.

Rocking out in a DeLorean.

But..... I won. >_>

:-(

Since it seems that you can't piece together a rational argument at this point, yes.

I haven't lobed any insults his/her way. I'm looking to have an open discussion about what the present facts are concerning the labor talks. If he/she can't actually respond to the arguments, then it's best to just concede defeat and move on.

I love you right now.

And this post is proof as to why you don't need to be involved in any kind of serious discussion about this topic.

Ah. This was news that I must have missed. Thanks Epoch.

I did last July.

No, your responses are laughable at best. You've failed to answer anything that has been asked of you during this discussion, and instead are opting to play dodge-ball while lobbing out the same tired comments that NBPA apologists have been using for nearly four months now.

FACT-The NBPA looked at the books on six franchises, which is what they have access to do every year at the end of the fiscal cycle for the league. They dropped their argument about that topic a long while back. This leads me to believe the books supported what Stern said. Give me another reason why something, which should be a critical talking point by the players and the media, has vanished from discussion.

You have acted like the players are owed something by the owners; like they're equal partners in this. They've been getting 57% of the BRI under the existing CBA, and the owners want an even split. Lets discuss why you don't think that's a good idea.

Oh, and all signing bonus money in NFL contracts are guaranteed to be paid, even though the entirety of the contract isn't guaranteed (which is another reason why the NFL runs a smarter operation than the NBA, which the NBA is trying to rectify).

Suck it up. How often do Cavs fans find reasons to chestbump? :-P