skelley
skelley's Comments
More FanHouse Blogs
- FCS Playoff Schedule
- BCS Rankings Week 13
- Amir Sadollah Bloodies Phil Baroni
- Mark Martin Remains Sentimental Favorite
- UFC 106 Results
- Nate Robinson Shoots at Wrong Basket
- Broadcasters Suspended for Haddadi Comments
- UFC 106 Fight Card
- Stefanie Spielman Dies at Age 42
- Bears Shun NBC for Sunday Night Game
Stub Hub
The 2009 schedule has been released. Search for tickets!
Truth & Rumors
MOST POPULAR
-
1
Bills owner wanted Gruden
- Views
- 62296
- Comments
- 393
-
2
Parcells to Browns?
- Views
- 28541
- Comments
- 246
-
3
Why Knicks passed on Iverson
- Views
- 31467
- Comments
- 112
-
4
FSU to offer Bowden compromise?
- Views
- 4489
- Comments
- 109
-
5
Raiders players happy with new QB
- Views
- 12688
- Comments
- 96
Most Active Users
Comments + Blog Posts + Throwdowns
Message Boards
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
2009's most disappointing team
- Views
- 794
- Replies
- 29
-
NCAAF > General NCAAF
CFB Game Day 11/21/2009
- Views
- 363
- Replies
- 145
-
NCAAF > LSU Tigers
Les Miles FIRE HIM
- Views
- 298
- Replies
- 30

Damaris Lewis
Jessica Hart



Basically you're saying, because Kiwanuka was about to do his job, in a legal, fair, manner, it was within Samuels' rights to take a dive at Kiwanuka's legs and do something totally illegal and unsportsmanlike to prevent it?
On the last play of the game, a meaningless snap, Kiwanuka was going all-out as he's supposed to. Samuels' response should have been to go all-out and not get burned on the outside like he did...not to take an ankle-dive that could have ended a player's season. It was a cheap, unnecessary shot. He got beat, and he should have accepted it. Since it was the last play of the game, it had no relevance to the outcome, so Samuels had no business doing something ILLEGAL to potentially injure a player who was doing something entirely LEGAL.
WHY, GIL MECHE OF COURSE! Were you not paying attention at that GAME CHANGING signing?
Maybe a Mark Teahan bobblehead night to replace the Jose Guillen one?
You would have thought they'd quiet down a bit after 18-1 happened.
Either way, this is a solid move for the Giants. Low-risk, high-reward move that shores up the depth chart and offers the chance to a still-talented player to prove his worth.
18-1, for those whose memories haven't failed them.
FIrst off, saying someone is overrated is in no way, shape, or form a slight against the player himself, a personal attack on him, or even a remark about his talents. It is merely an indication of how OTHER PEOPLE perceive him relative to his actual talent. Considering the world has universally agreed on Jeter being amazingly clutch, and consider he actually, for his career, bats 30 points BELOW his averages in late-and-close situations (along with a lower batting average in the postseason than regular season), it is completely fair to say that the man is overrated. The consensus on his level of play in the general public does not necessarily always match his numbers, even if his numbers are good. Furthermore, we're talking about a guy who has won 3 gold gloves SOLELY on reputation and on people getting a limited selection of ESPN highlights to judge on. It is statistically (and visually) verifiable that he is a below average, and perhaps just plain bad defensive shortstop...with 3 gloves on the mantle, when there more than just a few more deserving shortstops every one of those years. And hell, if you want to bring salary (relative to other players in the game, and as a whole), then he's just all kinds of ridiculously over-hyped.
Second of all, yes, players in the poll are probably jealous (some of them, anyway...I doubt Chase Utley, Vladimir Guerrero, Ichiro Suzuki, Johan Santana, Manny Ramirez, etc., etc. are particularly "jealous"). But part of that jealousy, to them, is warranted BECAUSE they feel he gets more credit than he deserves (and he does...even beyond the statistics, people talk non-stop about Jeter's intangibles which are, frankly, utter ****). Furthermore, resorting to just saying "OMG THE OTHER PLAYERS ARE JEALOUS," (which, by the way, shows the exact kind of defensiveness and over-zealous stance-taking that is generally associated with a too-close-to-true statement) how about more time be spent on actually considering that maybe, just maybe, there is a marginal amount of truth to the comments?
Yes, he's clutch (sometimes), and a great player, but the media has done a fantastic job of basically self-fulfilling their own prophecy of how clutch a player he is by playing up his successes, never mentioning his failures, and blasting his more talented teammates.
Maybe instead of such staunch denial and refusal to admit what these players have no reason to lie about, people should try to embrace the idea of advocating some change in the city, because it is historically, somehow, rather racist. Hunter has nothing to gain by lying. Yes, other fans in other cities are likely obnoxious...but two players have now said that a city with an already documented racist history, is the ONLY one where they hear this kind of stuff. Other fans may be crass, but the racism is apparently only experienced by them here. And it's not a surprise in the least, sadly.
What happens is, in serving the financial interest of their company, ESPN HAS to ignore the west coast...larger fan bases aren't gonna stick around to watch Angels highlights or Dodgers highlights, or hear about how some piss-on like Howie Kendrick is better than their fan-favorite like Melky Cabrera who is, realistically, no where near a top-50 player. This isn't really a matter of "maybe he's close, but not quite there"...he is just legitimately not a good player, and is not going to be. Just average at best. And most of all...the east coast is ASLEEP when half of west coast teams are playing. The best players in the west coast don't seem to get half the attention of the good/above-average ones on the east coast (more people know Kendrick than Pedroia, but I can tell you right now who is better by a mile).
Howie Kendrick is a career .360 hitter in the minor leagues, who has never hit below .320 at any level. He was baseball-america's #12 player in the country for 2006, and would be a household name if not for fluke injuries (HBP) last year. He makes contact almost every time at the plate, and every scout who has ever written a report on him agrees that he'll spend his entire career winning batting titles, with 15-20 homer power, and 20+ SBs. Given his track record, its not unreasonable to see him, if healthy, push .400 at some point, or be going for 3,000 hits before his 40th birthday. All he needs is health...the rest follows. His skill set is essentially that which suggests it would be EXTREMELY unlikely for him to bust out like some of the high-K/low-BB power prospect (see: Chad Hermansen).
My main "issue taking" is actually with an espn.com list a few weeks ago of the top 50 players in baseball over the next 5 years in which Kendrick was absent from the list, but somehow Melky Cabrera made the cut. There was one AL West player on the entire list. The slant in coverage by sports networks is pitiful. See: faux yanksox rivalry headlines from this weekend, ie the David Ortiz jersey plant. **** like that is likely pure fabrication, and is at best, worthy of a blurb on the back page of a New York rag...not of ESPN special coverage and long articles.
Oh, and for the record, I'm a Mets fan.
But hey, he doesn't play for the Yanksox, so why should we talk him? We've got Melky Cabrera's below average bat to chat up as if he's the next big thing instead.
WHO
GIVES
A
****
How dare he!
"Endearing" or not, Ozzie's attitude directly parallels that of someone who would, outside of the sports world, be considered a monumental ****. Deal with it or change your personality.
Just so you know, Barry went from the AL to the NL last year. Not the NL to the AL.
And Pedro made the switch from the NL to the AL well over a decade ago, long before any real discrepancy between the two leagues.
Plus, you know...Josh Beckett almost won the Cy Young last year, and still won the most games in baseball last year after switching from the NL.
You = fail.
And so are these piss-on contenders to win the NL Central.
So irrelevant. Why talk about them at all?