C-C-C's Comments

Posted Monday June 11, 2012, About: Manny was Robbed!!! Think before you post?
The entire blog has more holes than swiss cheese but this statement in particular is ridiculous:

[i]A controversy is good for ratings, it builds interest were interest was waning in Boxing Nation.[/i]

How in the hell was interest waning? The fight sold something in the neighborhood of 1 million pay per views at $65 a pop and Manny was the only draw. By comparison, MMA's premier PPV last year only sold 800k at a lower price point. Mayweather-Cotto sold more than 1.5 million ppv's. There is no "waning interest" in boxing. A lot of casual fans don't pay much attention when the heavyweight divisions is weak, as it is now, but to claim boxing fans are losing interest when we have fights grossing over $100mil is insane.

There won't be a 3rd fight nor will the next one be in Vegas. After Paq kills him in fight 2 there would be zero interest in a 3rd fight. None. It would simply be viewed as justice, not a legit 1-1. It will never happen. Arum stated immediately that the next fight won't be in Vegas after what he viewed as a fiasco. He has stated it will be somewhere with no income tax.

Mayweather is a non-factor in who won the fight. Made absolutely no difference to him either way. He's in jail until the end of August and won't be fighting again this year regardless. No way he'd have had time to train for a Paq fight after 3 months in jail. If it's "all about money" as you state, then it REALLY makes no sense to fix it to keep Maywhether out of the picture. A Paq-Floyd fight would draw 3 times as many buys. Paq losing actually HURTS the draw of that huge payday.

For your speculation to be true, everyone involved would have committed a felony and face severe prison sentences. This ain't the old days where boxing scams were hidden from public view. Even the slightest bit of evidence of a fix would bring the full force of the AG's office down. Vegas can't survive with fixed fights. No way these guys risked going to PRISON in order to hype a couple more fights and hide from Mayweather. That defies all logic and reason.

Pretty much the entire blog is misinformation and wild speculation that doesn't make sense to anyone thinking logically.
Posted Wednesday June 06, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
Let me tell you a story about big mouth punks who brag about where they are from as if it makes them tough, or something.

Not too long ago I was in a bar. A local boy was hitting on a girl when her boyfriend come up and confronted him (he had no idea she was with someone). Told him "I'm a boxer from New York, get away from my girl or you're going to get hurt"...now I'm just gonna tell ya, country boys aren't impressed by where you are from or what you do, and they don't take well to being told what THEY must do. Country boy looked him dead in the eye and said "Well, city slicker, I'm a redneck from Tullahoma and if you don't get out of my face, I'm gonna kick your ass". Boxer badass hit him in the face. Country boy smiled then proceeded to kick the living crap out of him. NYC boy was escorted out the door...without his girlfriend who best I could tell left with the redneck. All being a "boxer from NYC" got him was a good old fashioned ass whipping and no girlfriend.

I'm from the South Side of Chicago, but I'm also smart enough to know that doesn't mean jack when it comes to intimidating people. I also know you wouldn't actually go out in public making threats and saying your from Chicago in order to try and get someone to back down...at least you wouldn't do it more than once.
Posted Wednesday June 06, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
Dude, your internet tough guy act is old and tired. Fools like you have have been playing that game for a couple of decades now. I'm not really sure what you hope to accomplish by pretending you have friends that play professional baseball and football, or that "where you're from" makes you a badass (it doesn't).

Here's the truth. You are a semi-literate, uneducated loud mouth who spouts a lot of nonsense without any ability to back it up. My suggestion to you is to stop writing ridiculous drivel about refs throwing games and instead spend your time attempting to acquire a GED so that at least McDonalds will give you a job.
Posted Wednesday June 06, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
Dude, you are delusional. Watching the man play on TV doesn't make him your friend.
Posted Tuesday June 05, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
I've been to second city, not impressed, and you don't have friends that play for the Bears or Bulls. I suppose next you're going to tell me Jalen Rose is the guy who told you refs are throwing games for gamblers...
Posted Tuesday June 05, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
Brilliance!
Posted Tuesday June 05, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
How exactly was that an "easy win" princess? Jack is still considered by many/most to be the GOAT. The only thing making it easy was my opponent was an idiot.

Creating a stupid hypothetical TD idea doesn't make you intelligent, junior. Try backing up your own words or YOU shut your trap.
Posted Tuesday June 05, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
That's an incredibly stupid TD idea.

Let's debate your claim that refs are in the pocket of gamblers. Afraid to back up your own words?
Posted Tuesday June 05, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
Show me the quote from that fool claiming the refs [b]are fixing games for gamblers[/b]. THAT is what YOU claim.
Posted Monday June 04, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
You throw around a bunch of names claiming they are all saying the same things you are...here's a FACT for you. [b]Not a single one[/b] of the people you name dropped has claimed refs are fixing NBA games. Not a one has said anything CLOSE to that.
Posted Monday June 04, 2012, About: Talk of the finals has been about the refs
The refs had to take control of that game early or it had the potential to get ugly. Some of the calls may have been questionable, and as always some were missed entirely (like Wade raping Pierce and the refs determining it was a clean steal) but for the most part the refs did a good job.

There will ALWAYS be calls in EVERY game that fans question without knowing exactly what happened. A two dimensional replay of a three dimensional play doesn't trump an officials up close view in person.

That said, this clown puts a bunch of random words into only slightly coherent sentences that all make the same idiotic claim...that NBA refs are fixing games. It doesn't get much dumber than that. Oh, and he won't back up his absurd claims by actually debating...just regurgitates the same garbage over and over again.
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: High - five technical foul
It's not an "SI article" you goofbag. It's a truth and rumors snippet about George flipping Hill whining about the Pacers getting into early foul trouble in game one against the heat. There is no substance. Mr. Hill offers no evidence of anything. And the piece is written by [b]the Indianapolis Star[/b] (not, SI)

In fact, try reading the ENTIRE article, not just the Hill quotes:

http://www.indystar.com/article/20120514/SPORTS04/205130384/-b-Kravitz-b-Pace rs-no-one-blame-themselves

The HOME TOWN writer starts the piece thusly:

[i]Let's dispense with the foolishness right here and right now.

The Indiana Pacers [b]did not[/b] lose Game 1 of this Eastern Conference semifinals against the Miami Heat because the officiating was horrendous [/i]

Read that a couple of times until it sinks in. It follows with this:

[i][b]The Pacers didn't lose, 95-86, because the NBA wants the star-studded Miami Heat in the NBA Finals, because it's all part of some great big-market/small market conspiracy.[/b][/i]

You just used an article that says the OPPOSITE of what you claim as evidence of what you claim. It just don't get much dumber than that, dude.

Try reading entire articles instead of sensationalized headlines and THINK you know what the article says...better yet, get someone to read them to you and explain what the big words (more than 4 letters) mean before using an article as 'proof' of something.
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: High - five technical foul
In other words, you're nothing but a wussy wind bag who likes to run his mouth without backing it up. I got ya.
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: High - five technical foul
You gonna answer this?

I seriously can't wait to hear your masterful breakdown of why the NBA would want Memphis to beat L.A.
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: High - five technical foul
Huh? Toilet mouth? "Illiterate" isn't a bad word...you should have someone look it up for you.
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: Jeff Van Gundy what did you wish for ?
Well, that explains the 6 wins...
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: High - five technical foul
Duh, I'm a White Sox fan, that should have been your first clue. And if by "pampered" you mean I didn't have to ride the short bus or wear a helmet to class, I guess you're right.
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: Jeff Van Gundy what did you wish for ?
...or were actually pretending to be an internet athlete? That's even funnier!
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: Jeff Van Gundy what did you wish for ?
Wait...I'll bet that's a conspiracy, huh?
Posted Monday May 14, 2012, About: Jeff Van Gundy what did you wish for ?
Yes, your 6-20 TD record has everyone terrified to debate you. I think HCF might even be jealous of the 12 straight losses...
Posted Sunday May 13, 2012, About: High - five technical foul
[i]I will continue to blog about NBA refs until somebody grows some kahunas and call them down on the carpet about it .[/i]

You mean you will continue your biased rants until people agree with you. Good luck with that.

[i]got fined for complaining about bad officiating[/i]

Yes, because the guys who are fined are never in the wrong...

[i]People have been conspiring against other people , goverments , and major ccompanies you think the NBA is ammune from it ?[/i]

That depends on what "ammune" means.

[i]or the Black Sox scandal ?[/i]

What exactly does the 1919 World Series have to do with NBA refs? And you do know the "Black Sox" were caught, right? Conspiracies don't work because people can't keep their mouth shut. The sheer number of people who would have to be involved in a conspiracy of the Commissioners office directing the refs to calls games in favor of one team winning a series over another is so ridiculous as to be impossible.

And...MAKES NO SENSE.

Tell me, Mr. Tinfoil, why on earth would the NBA want Memphis to beat L.A.? Seems to me that is the LAST thing they'd want. The Memphis TV market is 49th in the country. LA is 2nd. is Stern conspiring to lower TV ratings??
Last Page

Truth & Rumors

MOST POPULAR

  1. 1
    'Melo wants to be wooed (like, Howard wooed)
    Views
    1679
    Comments
    1350
  2. 2
    Farrell defends Fenway's 'sleep room'
    Views
    1598
    Comments
    480
  3. 3
    Youthful Red Wings are rattled
    Views
    1643
    Comments
    291
  4. 4
    Bishop's severe injury
    Views
    2163
    Comments
    65
  5. 5
    Texans may take Clowney ... for someone else
    Views
    20648
    Comments
    63

SI.com

SI Photos