somehownotsingle

NEW RULE CHANGE PROPOSAL FOR TD's

01:47 PM ET 09.07

Views: 627
Comments: 0

I think that for the most part people on here are great about TD's. HOWEVER, it feels like sometimes people won't finish TDs just because they're losing. This is incredibly frustrating. So I propose a new TD rule: IF YOU ARE CURRENTLY LOSING A TD, YOU HAVE 24 HOURS TO POST YOUR NEXT ARGUMENT, OF YOU AUTOMATICALLY FORFEIT. Now I understand that some people might legitimately take more than a day to respond with an argument, but this situation seems to occur FAR less frequently than the abuse of people simply refusing to finish TDs because they…

> Read Entire Post > Comment

WHAT IF IT HAD BEEN USC OR LSU?

04:20 PM ET 09.05

Views: 946
Comments: 0

QUESTION, FANNATION: If App. St had beaten USC or LSU, would the voters have dropped them completely from the Top 25, as well? What about Texas or Florida? What about other big name schools that were ranked lower, such as Ohio St or Oklahoma. I'm curious if it was more than the scoreboard that was hurting Michigan. Michigan ended last season poorly, losing to OSU (which they should have won if not for a very very stupid personal foul that kept OSU's winning drive going) and then in a bowl game. Here's how I think the voters' minds might have…

> Read Entire Post > Comment

SUPER BOWLS THAT NEVER WERE

11:53 AM ET 09.05

Views: 703
Comments: 0

Being born in 1980, I have had the privilege of watching some pretty good Super Bowls in my day. I've also gotten to see the worst blows out in SB history, but that was okay with me because I really enjoy watching good offenses do their thing. Still I can't help wonder about those Super Bowls that never were. I can think of at least four times when the team from the NFC that I really wanted to get in didn't make it, and I think it made for a less exciting SB. See what you think: SB XXV: GIANTS VERSUS BILLS COULD HAVE BEEN: 49ERS VERSUS BILLSThis SB not…

> Read Entire Post > Comment